Was Paul Walker legally a sex offender, or too soon?

Dari

Lifer
Oct 25, 2002
17,133
38
91
The topic came up in Walker's death thread but was swiftly deleted by moderators who wanted the thread to be a positive one. But the fact that he dated 2 girls at the age of 16 when he was well into his 20s and 30s has me wondering who this guy really was. Today, R. Kelly is widely considered to be a pedophile because there's a video floating around of him having sex with a 15/16 year old. He was also put on trial. Wouldn't that put Mr. Walker into the same category? One 16 year old would raise eyebrows. Two would be confirmation that something is seriously wrong with him, IMHO.
 
Last edited by a moderator:

mnewsham

Lifer
Oct 2, 2010
14,539
428
136
Worst case that's Ephebophilia isn't it?

Also, what's the difference between 16 and 18?

if you think just because they were 16 that "something is seriously wrong with him" but if he had waited 2 years he is a normal functioning adult....?
 

Dari

Lifer
Oct 25, 2002
17,133
38
91
Worst case that's Ephebophilia isn't it?

Also, what's the difference between 16 and 18?

if you think just because they were 16 that "something is seriously wrong with him" but if he had waited 2 years he is a normal functioning adult....?

Because 16 is pushing the legal limit. IMHO, he was probably just "settling" instead of risking his freedom and stardom by going after the younger ones.
 

mnewsham

Lifer
Oct 2, 2010
14,539
428
136
Because 16 is pushing the legal limit. IMHO, he was probably just "settling" instead of risking his freedom and stardom by going after the younger ones.

You are basing that off what exactly?

His girlfriend is 23, they met when she was 16, I am fairly sure they were happy together at that point, he wasn't "settling" for anything...
 

gorcorps

aka Brandon
Jul 18, 2004
30,739
454
126
Because 16 is pushing the legal limit. IMHO, he was probably just "settling" instead of risking his freedom and stardom by going after the younger ones.

Seriously? So anybody who ALMOST breaks the law in your mind might as well should be locked up because they were just "settling"? This has to be trolling... nobody can be serious about being that fucking stupid.
 

olds

Elite Member
Mar 3, 2000
50,096
771
126
Seriously? So anybody who ALMOST breaks the law in your mind might as well should be locked up because they were just "settling"? This has to be trolling... nobody can be serious about being that fucking stupid.
He's not trolling...
 

nehalem256

Lifer
Apr 13, 2012
15,669
8
0
Because 16 is pushing the legal limit. IMHO, he was probably just "settling" instead of risking his freedom and stardom by going after the younger ones.

A pedophile is attracted to pre-pubescent children. Physically a 16 year old is basically an adult. So a true pedophile wouldn't "settle" for a 16 year old.

Honestly, I bet you are as attracted to 16 year girls as Paul Walker was ;)
 
Mar 11, 2004
23,444
5,847
146
Seriously? So anybody who ALMOST breaks the law in your mind might as well should be locked up because they were just "settling"? This has to be trolling... nobody can be serious about being that fucking stupid.

Is it a Dari thread? Then its trolling.
 

Dari

Lifer
Oct 25, 2002
17,133
38
91
Seriously? So anybody who ALMOST breaks the law in your mind might as well should be locked up because they were just "settling"? This has to be trolling... nobody can be serious about being that fucking stupid.

You must have a hard time with reading or comprehending what the words mean. I never said "might as well should be locked up..." I said he went as low as he legally could. Any lower and he'd be in prison.

As I've said before, one 16 year old is bad enough. Two and it's official that something is not right. He met the 2nd 16 year old at age 33. WTF.
 

Dari

Lifer
Oct 25, 2002
17,133
38
91
A pedophile is attracted to pre-pubescent children. Physically a 16 year old is basically an adult. So a true pedophile wouldn't "settle" for a 16 year old.

Honestly, I bet you are as attracted to 16 year girls as Paul Walker was ;)

R Kelly settled even though he was introduced to her at the age of 12 and was allegedly very aggressive in courting her. And R. Kelly is a free man today.
 

mnewsham

Lifer
Oct 2, 2010
14,539
428
136
You must have a hard time with reading or comprehending what the words mean. I never said "might as well should be locked up..." I said he went as low as he legally could. Any lower and he'd be in prison.

As I've said before, one 16 year old is bad enough. Two and it's official that something is not right. He met the 2nd 16 year old at age 33. WTF.

and if he had met her at 18 when he was 35 we'd all be patting him on the back for nailing a hot 18 year old.

The facts remain, nothing he did was strictly illegal, and further it's none of our business, we weren't involved in his life or his relationships, anything you say on the matter is fairly pointless, especially considering the only thing that can come from this is to posthumously besmirch Paul walker which is very disrespectful, if he molested an 11 year old, or tried to have sex with a preschooler, then sure we could have that discussion, but you're just being stupid with how things stand now.
 

Fritzo

Lifer
Jan 3, 2001
41,920
2,161
126
Because 16 is pushing the legal limit. IMHO, he was probably just "settling" instead of risking his freedom and stardom by going after the younger ones.

I don't say this often, but you're an idiot.
 

Dari

Lifer
Oct 25, 2002
17,133
38
91
and if he had met her at 18 when he was 35 we'd all be patting him on the back for nailing a hot 18 year old.

The facts remain, nothing he did was strictly illegal, and further it's none of our business, we weren't involved in his life or his relationships, anything you say on the matter is fairly pointless, especially considering the only thing that can come from this is to posthumously besmirch Paul walker which is very disrespectful, if he molested an 11 year old, or tried to have sex with a preschooler, then sure we could have that discussion, but you're just being stupid with how things stand now.

He was a public figure and those are fair games. I don't care if he's dead or alive. Besides, all this information came to my attention after he died. Before that, I never bothered to dig into his personal life. If I did, I probably would've enjoyed his movies a lot less. If you feel I'm disrespecting someone you care about feel free to leave the thread. Or defend him, makes no difference to me. Either way, dating a girl that was less than half your age (when you were 33 no less) is disgusting.
 

mnewsham

Lifer
Oct 2, 2010
14,539
428
136
dating a girl that was less than half your age (when you were 33 no less) is disgusting.

So you would be equally disgusted by a 45 year old rich wall street businessman nailing a 20 year old college girl?
 

thraashman

Lifer
Apr 10, 2000
11,112
1,585
126
I'm fairly sure the R. Kelly girl was actually 14, which makes it illegal in every state since I believe 1995 when Georgia and Hawaii raised their age of consent from 14 to 16. The age of consent in 30 of the 50 states last I checked was actually 16, so there's a good chance him dating a 16 year old was in no way illegal.
 

Dari

Lifer
Oct 25, 2002
17,133
38
91
So you would be equally disgusted by a 45 year old rich wall street businessman nailing a 20 year old college girl?

Absolutely not. Happens all the time around here. IMHO, so long as she's over 18 she's fair game. 16 is disgusting and (legally) pushing the limit.
 

Dari

Lifer
Oct 25, 2002
17,133
38
91
I'm fairly sure the R. Kelly girl was actually 14, which makes it illegal in every state since I believe 1995 when Georgia and Hawaii raised their age of consent from 14 to 16. The age of consent in 30 of the 50 states last I checked was actually 16, so there's a good chance him dating a 16 year old was in no way illegal.

Being a pedophile is not illegal if you don't act on it. But dating multiple girls at that legal limit is a clear sign that you might be a pedophile.