ch33zw1z
Lifer
- Nov 4, 2004
- 38,221
- 18,685
- 146
If he's banging multiple 16 year olds, me thinks he's looking at their younger sisters...
You think like a pedophile. Seek help.
If he's banging multiple 16 year olds, me thinks he's looking at their younger sisters...
You are wrong. Where did I say that? I don't know about others but I never stop being a parent and will never let my daughter go with an older person. Hence my statement.
So if your daughter were 27 and dating a 53 year old that's not okay and you'd do something to force them apart? Even though they are two consenting adults?
So if your daughter were 27 and dating a 53 year old that's not okay and you'd do something to force them apart? Even though they are two consenting adults?
A father has the right to oppose a relationship of such a vast age difference. But at that age, if he raised her right and she is of sound mental capacity, he would leave it to her because it's her life. But, at the age of 16, it's a whole other ballgame.
and apparently a completely different ball game a mere two years later at 18 where she can tell him to suck a dick and she rides off into the sunset with her 50 year old rich bastard.
are the two years between 16 and 18 more significant than the 9 years between 18 and 27?
Not in this state.![]()
To people that ask whats the difference between a 16 and 18? If its your daughter thats the difference. Even 16 and 20 gap, the difference becomes your concern if its your daughter.
If he's banging multiple 16 year olds, me thinks he's looking at their younger sisters...
To be a "Sex Offender", sex has to have been performed, at the very least. If some kind of evidence of such a thing can be offered, maybe he was. That will depend on the Laws in the particular jurisdiction.
Umm, you can touch someone underage and be labeled a sex offender by law.
Umm, you can touch someone underage and be labeled a sex offender by law.
To be a "Sex Offender", sex has to have been performed, at the very least. If some kind of evidence of such a thing can be offered, maybe he was. That will depend on the Laws in the particular jurisdiction.
The title was changed by a moderator...
A pedophile is attracted to pre-pubescent children. Physically a 16 year old is basically an adult. So a true pedophile wouldn't "settle" for a 16 year old.
Honestly, I bet you are as attracted to 16 year girls as Paul Walker was![]()
To be a "Sex Offender", sex has to have been performed, at the very least. If some kind of evidence of such a thing can be offered, maybe he was. That will depend on the Laws in the particular jurisdiction.
The topic came up in Walker's death thread but was swiftly deleted by moderators who wanted the thread to be a positive one. But the fact that he dated 2 girls at the age of 16 when he was well into his 20s and 30s has me wondering who this guy really was. Today, R. Kelly is widely considered to be a pedophile because there's a video floating around of him having sex with a 15/16 year old. He was also put on trial. Wouldn't that put Mr. Walker into the same category? One 16 year old would raise eyebrows. Two would be confirmation that something is seriously wrong with him, IMHO.

Is Dari legally a mental retard, or a fool?
Who gives a fuck?![]()
