I didn't say that, putting words in somebody's mouth is a pretty embarrassing way to have a discussion.
There are laws in place and people need to obey them. You must obey the laws of the state and country you live in, and I absolutely believe that. However, you're trying to convict people who are still obeying said laws. The difference between R. Kelly and Paul Walker is that one broke the law and one didn't. End of story. You're trying to make up your own laws and criticize anybody who doesn't meet your twisted view of the legal system. If what PW did was fucked up then it would have been in the law books that way, but it's not so leave it alone.
The system says innocent until proven guilty, and you're spitting in the face of that system by treating somebody as if they already broke the law when they didn't. However it's that same system that sets the age of consent, something which you take very seriously (and rightfully so, because it's the law). So why are you picking and choosing which parts of the system you want to hold people to, and which parts your choose to ignore? I for one agree with the system as it currently stands, but that system says 16 is legal in some places... period. If you're going to continue this discussion, I suggest you stop being so hypocritical as it's making you look silly.