Originally posted by: goku2100
These weren't questions really, I just thought quizzing would be fun. The first few were questions though, BMW doesn't have a high market share because they are expensive. But all servers are expensive as well and they have a relatively high market share. The 600macs is no surprise, what do you expect its the movie industry, they dont know better. I never denied macs being used in the entertainment industry but I have continue to state a company like IBM's website is NOT on mac servers despite them being thier processors. The hosting company is one of few who would do that, whether or not it was a smart decision, time will only tell. What expansion capabilities do you have with a mac? When a mac gets old, the only thing you really can do is put it in storage and let it collect dust or have it do simplier tasks. If apple was such a popular platform it wouldn't matter how much is sold. Still the MS OS makes the mac os like small peanuts. I think even Dell out sells apples macintosh platform because dell has the same appeal as do mac people, except some buy dell because of software compatibility.
A standard BMW 3-series is under $30k, just like the pricing for top of the line Honda and Toyota sedans., so you can't say that they are too or more expensive. And BMWs don't suck in quality because they have low market share, the same way Apple products don't suck simply because they have low market share.
Your assertion that "all servers are expensive" is false too. You get what you pay for. For example, Dell's low-end servers are the exact same as their workstations in price and quality.
goku, you first said that Macs suck because they have no market share and are functionally worthless. After we provided numerous examples (VT G5 supercluster, hosting company, various Linux distros, etc.) you counter by saying the entertainment industry doesn't know better, or the government is wasteful in spending, or time will tell if it was a smart decision for the hosting company to switch over to Mac. So which is it?
Here's an example of expansion capabilities on a Mac. The original Mac G4 Cube was 450 MHz. There are now CPU cards to upgrade the Cube to a 1.5 GHz G4. That's an increase of over 3x in clockspeed. In the PC world, when were you ever able to just swap out your CPU for one 3x faster, without also having to upgrade the motherboard and memory? If you check prices on used Macs, you'll see that they retain their value much longer than commodity PC hardware exactly because they're more useful than their PC counterparts.
If you want to argue the technical merits of Windows versus OS X, feel free to start talking. But I personally prefer Unix and I prefer a desktop environment with consistent human interface guidelines and hardware accelerated rendering, neither of which Windows offers. You may prefer Windows for other reasons but there is no way you can fairly dismiss OS X as trash.
You can't compare Apple and Dell since they're business strategies are totally different. Dell does not innovate at all and relies on volume in order to make money. Apple has a reputation of being hip, niche, and cool. Dell is none of those. People don't buy Dell because of it's awesome quality or software compatability or because it comes with Windows---they buy Dell because it's cheap.