I dunno about "A LOT". I find its styling very similar. They are just calling it a "Dart" to try and keep their retro theme going. THe only big difference I can see is the nose is longer and the headlights arent round
You're legally blind, right?
I dunno about "A LOT". I find its styling very similar. They are just calling it a "Dart" to try and keep their retro theme going. THe only big difference I can see is the nose is longer and the headlights arent round
You're legally blind, right?
well, theres no point in throwing insults around. I have my opinion, and you have yours, niether of us is going to change the others.
I think this car is bland, and therefore compares to the neon (its obvious predecessor) which was also bland.
Right. But you can't tell me that the Dart looks worst than the Neon...that's like telling me 1+1=3.
One of the Dart variants is apparently rated at 40mpg combined.
http://www.fiatspa.com/en-US/media_...st_in_Chrysler_Group_LLC_to_58,5_per_cent.pdf
Right. But you can't tell me that the Dart looks worst than the Neon...that's like telling me 1+1=3.
By that I mean the 3.6L Pentastar® V6 w/283 Horsepower which won't happen...........yet!
I think this car looks pretty decent and much better than anything Dodge has put out for years. I wish they had a hatchback version...but maybe that will come later.
As for the manual vs. automatic. I am a big proponent of the manual and have been driving manual cars for a long time. I have always hated automatics and their complete lack of control. All of that being said, since I recently sold my car and have been driving around my wife's car regularly, I am surprised at how quickly I have come to like her automatic. It is a newer ZF automatic and it does a tremendous job of being in the right gear at the right time. If you want to push it, just put the transmission into S mode or change gears manually. Works very well. Not all automatics are created equal, but this one is a real peach. Maybe I'm getting old, but this automatic is making me a lot more open to them down the road.
I find all these compacts bland. I can't understand the love affair they seem to get around here, not a damn one of them is inspiring to me. I think they are fine as entry level commute cars and "I just want to pay as little money as possible on a new car". But absolutely nothing more.
well, theres no point in throwing insults around. I have my opinion, and you have yours, niether of us is going to change the others.
I think this car is bland, and therefore compares to the neon (its obvious predecessor) which was also bland.
The Pentastar has 298 HP, actually, and that's considered an underrated number.
Hehe, no A/C, manual entry AND transmission. Now that's what I call a base model! :awe:
The Dart is soooo much better looking than the old Neons that it shouldnt even be a discussion.
I don't think it's similar at all. It looks more like a Focus. But the Neon was a nice looking car. Clean styling, and not frumpy like the competition at the time.
hhaha I dunno, I didn't really know which was which. Only real difference is the black in the front. Otherwise, the way the Dart was staged makes it look better. And better wheels. Not much of a difference tho...
it body double was the plymouth roadrunner
I have the same transmission in my 2012 Charger. It's amazing. 8 gears of awesome. I push the pedal and it just flies, always seems to be in the perfect gear for the situation. Double overdrive means good mpg. And it shaved 2 seconds off the car's 0-60 time from the previous year with no difference other than the tranny.
Anyone else vomiting in their keyboard everytime they see a new retro car being announced? Can these design teams and engineers please make futuristic cars please? You know ones that can fly, drive through all types of terrain, don't need drivers???
Watch some sci fi movies automotive industry people