I heard that Dominion is suing Powell for over 1 Billion dollars. I imagine she doesn't have anything like that kind of money. Now, a lean on Trump would be nice. I'd love to hear he's convicted by the Senate and that he's filing for bankruptcy again. Permanent bans by Facebook and Youtube would also be great news. I want to see moving companies taking away the furniture from Mar-a-Lago.
He keeps boasting about how discovery is going to allow him to uncover some supposed grand conspiracy to rig the election. I strongly suspect he's going to be one very unhappy, and very poor man in the not so distant future.
www.newsweek.com
I agree he doesn't seem super smart. He's also going to be very sad when the Trump movement tosses him aside without a second thought when he's no longer useful.
Gun to my head and I have to pick one, taking my chances with the crack.
beta.documentcloud.org
www.npr.org
Oh wait, he said he "welcomed" the law suit so he could access there information. You don't suppose that was just some verbal bravado, and like a true trumpanzee all bullshit.
www.cnn.com
But.. But... It worked for Fox News and Tucker Carlson!!!!Sidney Powell filed a brief in the Dominion case, essentially making the argument that no reasonable person would take her statements as factual assertions, but rather as "opinions" or mere "claims."
Sidney Powell argues in new court filing that no reasonable people would believe her election fraud claims
Right-wing lawyer Sidney Powell is claiming in a new court filing that reasonable people wouldn't have believed as fact her assertions of fraud after the 2020 presidential election.
This was a predictable line of defense but not only will it fail because her statements were presented as factual assertions, but she's embarrassing herself and the entire "stop the steal" crowd while she's at it. If no reasonable people would take her statements as factual, then what does that say about all the people who did?
Sidney Powell filed a brief in the Dominion case, essentially making the argument that no reasonable person would take her statements as factual assertions, but rather as "opinions" or mere "claims."
Sidney Powell argues in new court filing that no reasonable people would believe her election fraud claims
Right-wing lawyer Sidney Powell is claiming in a new court filing that reasonable people wouldn't have believed as fact her assertions of fraud after the 2020 presidential election.
This was a predictable line of defense but not only will it fail because her statements were presented as factual assertions, but she's embarrassing herself and the entire "stop the steal" crowd while she's at it. If no reasonable people would take her statements as factual, then what does that say about all the people who did?
This is the classic Fox News defense, and it somehow keeps working. Probably because the courts are packed with Republican judges and judges hold individuals to too high of a standard.Sidney Powell filed a brief in the Dominion case, essentially making the argument that no reasonable person would take her statements as factual assertions, but rather as "opinions" or mere "claims."
Sidney Powell argues in new court filing that no reasonable people would believe her election fraud claims
Right-wing lawyer Sidney Powell is claiming in a new court filing that reasonable people wouldn't have believed as fact her assertions of fraud after the 2020 presidential election.
This was a predictable line of defense but not only will it fail because her statements were presented as factual assertions, but she's embarrassing herself and the entire "stop the steal" crowd while she's at it. If no reasonable people would take her statements as factual, then what does that say about all the people who did?
TC is followed by millions of people everyday, including educated, fully functional people, that defense should never work when you have that sort of platform.
Facebook
Twitter