How is it absurd if they sell by the shit-load anyway? And when there is great demand for it? Do I speak on their behalf any more than you speak for AMD's PR dept? 🙄
If AMD could do that, they would and SHOULD. But I doubt they think they can. Again, if they could, they WOULD. And if I was an AMD shareholder I would smack their CEOs face with a dead fish if they could but didnt.
I would never have bought a Titan because I always thought it was poor value for money - no let me clarify that, VERY poor value for money. But if you think that all products should be subject to the same value for money scale, regardless of price, and regardless of those who can afford them, then in your world there would be no Ferraris, Rolexes, Riva speedboats, B&W speakers, etc. I would probably have to put on my Mao hat for you. 😛
So you speak from the shareholders point of view, are you one or do you have other ties to NV?
I have nothing to do with AMD - no ties whatsoever, I just speak from the consumer point of view. Nothing you say lines up with the buyers point of view, it's all from the point of view of someone who benefits from higher prices (not the consumer).
If the high end card has been $550ish for the past few generations, how is it beneficial to anyone
except the company/employees/shareholders etc. to raise the prices to $650, $700, $1000?
If you are an NV shareholder/ties I don't care, it just explains your rationale when trying to pretend higher prices is good. Strawman if AMD this, they would do that... doesn't matter nor justify it either.
It's actually absurd some posters pretend to be "enthusiasts", yet they claim raising prices is somehow justified and good. There is no way that is true unless you have ties to the company.
Not sure if serious?...The Hawaii chip is awesome, but the design and build quality aren't even close...Why are you even comparing it to the Titan?
Appears amenx is right on the money!.
Not sure if you're serious.
The 290x gives the titan a run for it's money and ties/slightly beats it at 1600p.
Going higher resolution gives it a substantial win. Why would they not be looked at with equal standards? Sure the reference cooler sucks, and we'll see the effect of aftermarket cards soon. Why the double standard (rhetorical question which I know will be avoided), supposedly the fastest commands ever higher premiums? Perhaps the cooler can knock $50 off the value? It's still equal to or beating the titan. I know it's hard to look at both companies objectively, however if you are claiming price premiums are good, keep it objective and not only "good" if they are team green.
There is no way it's beneficial to the consumer so I'm not going to argue and watch the deflections. Unless you have something worthy of discussing I'm going to try avoid pointless back and forth since you clearly don't have the consumer in mind (which I am). Feel free to objectively discuss it and correct me if I'm indeed wrong.