Zanovar
Diamond Member
- Jan 21, 2011
- 3,446
- 232
- 106
At the time of release, Intel will also field Skylake with PCIe 4.0.
Erm,cheers for that i guess.
At the time of release, Intel will also field Skylake with PCIe 4.0.
Does this mean that if you have a PCI-E express 3.0 slots in a motherboard NVLink will be already to work on it?NVLink is PCIe based. But its only used for GPU to GPU.
*snip*
It helps to do the homework before complaining.
You mean Intel will release skylake in 2016 ?At the time of release, Intel will also field Skylake with PCIe 4.0.
Does this mean that if you have a PCI-E express 3.0 slots in a motherboard NVLink will be already to work on it?
NVLink is not used to link your CPU to your gaming card.
With NVLink technology tightly coupling IBM POWER CPUs with NVIDIA Tesla® GPUs, the POWER data center ecosystem will be able to fully leverage GPU acceleration for a diverse set of applications, such as high performance computing, data analytics and machine learning.
That's fine, but what about the desktop X86 market. I can't imagine that they don't need to sell to that market as well. AMD will want to have an industry standard (as they always do) for unified memory and will want it to include dGPU. nVidia is not too proud to use standards like Display Port with GSync.
Just a possibility. Curious to see what happens.
It's just an example of what a mezzanine connector looks like, according to AT. It's not the NVLink connector.Hmm, the mezzanine connector shown in AT's link doesn't look too practical to me. Looks very.. very expensive.
With the way they're talking about NVLInk working, and with what the connection method will be like, this seems to be a first step towards not needing a full PCI style card anymore. Almost like a socketed GPU if I'm understanding it correctly, correct me if I'm wrong.
You guys ready to upgrade your Audi with new computer parts? lol, and he actually expected an applause from that.
Only a GK110 made with laffy taffy could be stretched further than what Nvidia's done over the last year and a half. I cringe to think what they will do if Maxwell 20nm comes out in 2015. They've already iterated the memory to 6GB, maybe we will get a 780 TI Black NOS version?
You laugh now but wait until my new Audi has dual Titan Black-Z's in it. It'll be the fastest car on the planet!!!!!
Not to bring this completly off topic, but does anyone know the roadmap for AMD 20nm? Its been quite silent at AMD.
Start a separate discussion thread for this. It is not on topic for this discussion.
-- stahlhart
20nm is the topic. Have you googled "cognitive distortions"?
I have no idea why people believe that it will be high performance 20nm GPUs. And so called "journalists" responsible for such claim should be banned from the web. Really.
They are only one 20nm process at TSMC and it's called 20SoC. This process is not adapted for power hungry GPUs. It's for... SoCs. Period.
We may see a mid range Maxwell this year but it will still be 28HP. For gen2 top range Maxwell, we have to wait for 16FinFet. sadly...
You guys ready to upgrade your Audi with new computer parts? lol, and he actually expected an applause from that.
Only a GK110 made with laffy taffy could be stretched further than what Nvidia's done over the last year and a half. I cringe to think what they will do if Maxwell 20nm comes out in 2015. They've already iterated the memory to 6GB, maybe we will get a 780 TI Black NOS version?
I miss the good old days. Best of a generation comes first. GTX 280, GTX 480, GTX 580, GTX 680 (wait WTH?) GTX 690 (Dual mid range wth?) Titan (WTH is this crap?) GTX 780 (Oh good lord, finally I think?) GTX 780 Ti (The real deal, again, huh?!) GTX 780 Ti 6gb (Real deal AGAIN! OMG!)