sooo.. Roethlisberger > P. Manning?
:hmm:
then.. Terry Bradshaw >>>> Roethlisberger.
:hmm::hmm:
Thank god for the ignore user feature
The refs helped the Steelers out too, I accept that, what happened to the NFL being a team sport like you say later on in your post though? Don't flip-flop, he was still the starting QB and his team won with him. One could say he was a huge part in why they got there in the first place.
And stabbing or not Ben had to turn his back to Harper before tackling him, who had room to run in nearly ever direction except the one he took. Was one of the most impressive non-offense plays I've seen a QB make. If Harper seriously couldn't play then he shouldn't have been in there, him being in on a goal-line stance is enough for me to assume he was good enough to put out there in one of the most desperate moments that game had for Indy.
He was still the QB of the team Brad Johnson/Trent Dilfered his way through the game. Ward doesn't get his MVP of the SB without Ben zoning in on his clutch receiver.
An elite QB overcomes poor defenses. Warner always had crappy D's and he did all he could to overcome it, to the tune of something like 10-5 in the play-offs.
"You can't pull the plug that fast after you spend your whole offseason building around this guy," panelist Mel Kiper Jr., ESPN's draft expert, noted. "Second, Vick, based on how he plays, fits almost any scheme because he's going to freelance regardless. If you need him, he doesn't need a ton of reps to step in and make an impact."
Keep jerking it at nights to your replica #9 jersey. I'm not losing any sleep when someone who copy/pastes HAHAHA a million times, brings nothing to the table by way of opinion or fact, then gets fed up to the point he has to ignore someone because they don't agree with you. Have a good life sir, whatever kind of life someone like you must live.
Let's get this out of the way -- Indy's loss to the Steelers was completely inexcusable. Indy was a better team, had a reason to win (for Dungy), and had completely and totally embarrassed the Steelers on national TV earlier that season. The Colts did get away with one when Polamalu picked Manning off and it was ruled that he didn't catch it (he did).
Intersting article. The espn guys make the case for Kolb.
http://sports.espn.go.com/nfl/news/story?id=5602696
Wow, I didn't know I said SB victories was the only thing that mattered with a top tier QB debate. :hmm:
And considering the fact that Brees had to play with flimsy defenses until last year while roethlisberger had an top tier defense behind him his WHOLE career makes the argument for Roethlisberger a little weaker.
I'm not flip flopping. You guys are acting as if Ben somehow won the game himself and I'm pointing out that no, his TEAM won the game. Being a Manning fan, I know more than anyone about football being a team sport. Peyton may have had poor playoff performances but damn, many of those times his defense was awful.
Let's get this out of the way -- Indy's loss to the Steelers was completely inexcusable. Indy was a better team, had a reason to win (for Dungy), and had completely and totally embarrassed the Steelers on national TV earlier that season. The Colts did get away with one when Polamalu picked Manning off and it was ruled that he didn't catch it (he did).
Nevertheless, while the play Ben made WAS excellent, the part that made me laugh was the "gave up his body" part. Otherwise I agree it was a good play. Ben fell over, reached out, and snagged Harper's leg, thereby tripping him. When I read the "gave up his body" remark, all I pictured was Roethlisberger taking a dive in front of a barrelling 350 lb defensive lineman. That didn't happen.
BTW, I could still kick Harper's ass. He could've easily run around Roethlisberger and won the game.
Errrr -- Randle El was the one who threw the game clinching 43 yd TD strike to Ward that clinched him the MVP award. That was Ward's only score and while he did have 123 total yards of receiving, Randle El's pass won the MVP for Ward.
I don't know that I agree with you there. An elite QB can only do so much and at the end of the day, they don't play D. Not to sound like a homer, but Manning is the best QB I've seen at masking his own team's poor defense. Warner was good at it too. But in the end, both were bitten -- Manning in SB 44 and Warner in SB 43.
I see where he is coming from for sure, but I think Vick gives them the best chance to win now.
Besides that, Kiper is a douche.
OK, but are the Eagles really in a position to make a super bowl run this year, or even a playoff run, regardless of who's at QB? Their o-line is a mess, defense hasn't looked great in the first 2 games, running game is pretty average, etc.
If it's a year where they expect to go 8-8, how does Vick starting now help them for the future?
Kiper and John Clayton are so impressed with themselves they can't go to sleep at night just thinking how awesome they are.
Montana or MarinoI'll take Brady. 2 minutes left and the teams down 6 points. Who do you want QB'ing the team?
Montana or Marino![]()
In order to calm his teammates in the huddle just before the final game-winning drive, Montana pointed into the stadium crowd and said "Hey, isn't that John Candy?"
I'll take Brady. 2 minutes left and the teams down 6 points. Who do you want QB'ing the team?
Keep jerking it at nights to your replica #9 jersey. I'm not losing any sleep when someone who copy/pastes HAHAHA a million times, brings nothing to the table by way of opinion or fact, then gets fed up to the point he has to ignore someone because they don't agree with you doesn't want to read my posts. Have a good life sir, whatever kind of life someone like you must live.
Their o-line is a mess
[...]
...how does Vick starting now help them for the future?
