Originally posted by: Noobtastic
Originally posted by: jpeyton
Originally posted by: Noobtastic
Uhhh...it's called war.
Amazing we have people on this forum excuse the murder of an unarmed family...in their beds, in their home...mother, father, brother, sister...under the excuse of "it's war".
Uh, no. I'm not saying those who violate the rules of war shouldn't be punished because it's "war", rather, it should be EXPECTED.
When you have 300,000+ soldiers being sandbagged with 5 tours of duty, contrary to their 2-3 tour contract, the likelihood of incidents increase.
it's just math. There will always be problem soldiers in a war of this scale.
Even in war, we are bound by rules of engagement. Look them up junior.
I'm not denying that, but what is the purpose of this thread? I appreciate the rules of engagement but what does that have to do with anything???
You are plastering an isolated incident as an object to argue with. You are denying the war based on a typical soldier angst parade.
This happened WWI, WWII, Korea, Vietnam, Desert Storm, etc..etc..etc..'
It's happened in ALL wars. The fact that you are shocked could be considered testimonial to your blatant naivety.
Let's turn this around: How about I copy and paste the thousands and thousands of info documenting the atrocities by the Iraqi government and other Islamic/ME nations?
Do you think that is a valid entry in discrediting a conflict?
Your fallacies and propaganda might fool some, but not me.