Update: Triggered liberal assaults, robs white 16yr old boy with MAGA hat *NOW ARRESTED*

Page 5 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.

realibrad

Lifer
Oct 18, 2013
12,337
898
126
Noone is saying that and of course they are. Wtf?

When well-known left wing media figures start telling lies about how "This is war!" and intentionally and knowingly incite violence from their followers, like a large number of right wing media figures do every day... then you might have a point.

He is saying that the well-known Right wing media are intentionally and knowingly inciting violence from their followers more than the Left does. Keep up.
 

HomerJS

Lifer
Feb 6, 2002
39,646
33,233
136
Well you should considering you're losing young white males by the hundreds who are now switching parties and getting red pilled thanks to shit like this. The media and Maxine Waters want violence, but not the consequences of the violence. You reap what you sow - oh there are more incidents like this but this was exceptionally poignant since it happened on the 4th amid the Reuters poll that young white males are fleeing the Dem party. Here's an up close and personal video example of why.
The loss of women after that SC pick will more then make up for it. Methinks you forgot all those women not just here but around the world 1 week after Trump was sworn in.
 

HomerJS

Lifer
Feb 6, 2002
39,646
33,233
136
Maxine Waters openly incited this kind of behavior. You forget a lot it seems.
You are a liar. She did no such thing. She advocated confronting them with you are not welcome here. Trump is the only one calling for violence. From his own people and from the police.

I know facts mean nothing to you people so just setting the record straight.
 

greatnoob

Senior member
Jan 6, 2014
968
395
136
You are like a retarded puppy that follows me around.

Based on your posts I’d say you’re the retarded puppy. Not only can you not read but your entire schtick is being a “both sides do it” conservative apologist and falling back to your pedantic moron act when your any one of your awfully weak positions are even remotely challenged. Do yourself a favour read a book, learn how to debate and then with your new found critical thinking skills you may be able to post something of substance in these forums. Until then, fuck off with your concern trolling.
 
  • Like
Reactions: JSt0rm and ivwshane

trenchfoot

Lifer
Aug 5, 2000
16,004
8,597
136
You are a liar. She did no such thing. She advocated confronting them with you are not welcome here. Trump is the only one calling for violence. From his own people and from the police.

I know facts mean nothing to you people so just setting the record straight.

Trump sure did incite violence during his rallies and it was pretty short sighted....well stupid actually, for him to ignore the fact that there definitely would be blowback from his riling up his followers with such incendiary rhetoric. But what got me a bit surprised was his doubling down on this little trick of his to rally support around himself instead of responsibly ratcheting back on the calls to violence to smooth things over.

And then I sort'a chuckled when his supporters claimed themselves to be victims of the very violence they were egged into by Trump himself, of which they've managed to use in so many other ways.

Always the victims, never the bullies that Trump incited them to be.

I mean, what did Trump's knuckle dragging supporters expect with their calls to violence and their lashing out at any and all who would dare stand up to their shenanigans?

Trump is directly responsible for it all and he's still going at it, inciting violence and then claiming victimhood whenever this idiotic and dangerous ploy of his backfires in his face.
 

dphantom

Diamond Member
Jan 14, 2005
4,763
327
126
http://www.businessinsider.com/whataburger-video-shows-maga-hat-stolen-drink-thrown-2018-7
http://dailycaller.com/2018/07/04/stranger-maga-hat-tosses-drink/
https://www.dailywire.com/news/3265...own-man-wearing-maga-hat-amanda-prestigiacomo
http://www.foxnews.com/us/2018/07/0...burger-because-was-wearing-pro-trump-hat.html



We need about 10 more of these before the midterms. Oh and remember the Reuters poll on the 23pt swing of young white male voters? This is only going to further speed up them switching parties to Repubs. Given now that science has proven liberals have a fight or flight response to opposing viewpoints, this triggering makes a lot more sense now. It's in their DNA to get triggered.

Oh and btw, the guy was fired from his job already and faces criminal charges. Even the threat of these things happening isn't enough for them to control getting triggered and going into a rage by something as stupid as a MAGA hat. But it's soooo cathartic to just assault random kids who disagree with my politics! And what about my feels? Don't you care about my feels?
late to this party but sounds like some type of assault to me. perhaps a double tap could be in order if circumstances warranted?
 

greatnoob

Senior member
Jan 6, 2014
968
395
136
Trump sure did incite violence during his rallies and it was pretty short sighted....well stupid actually, for him to ignore the fact that there definitely would be blowback from his riling up his followers with such incendiary rhetoric. But what got me a bit surprised was his doubling down on this little trick of his to rally support around himself instead of responsibly ratcheting back on the calls to violence to smooth things over.

And then I sort'a chuckled when his supporters claimed themselves to be victims of the very violence they were egged into by Trump himself, of which they've managed to use in so many other ways.

Always the victims, never the bullies that Trump incited them to be.

I mean, what did Trump's knuckle dragging supporters expect with their calls to violence and their lashing out at any and all who would dare stand up to their shenanigans?

Trump is directly responsible for it all and he's still going at it, inciting violence and then claiming victimhood whenever this idiotic and dangerous ploy of his backfires in his face.

At this point Trumptards are so far gone that the only way for them to ever snap back to reality is if they die. Luckily the GOP are hellbent on cutting social services and healthcare so it won’t be too long until these morbidly stupid people die off.
 
  • Like
Reactions: trenchfoot

dphantom

Diamond Member
Jan 14, 2005
4,763
327
126
Trump sure did incite violence during his rallies and it was pretty short sighted....well stupid actually, for him to ignore the fact that there definitely would be blowback from his riling up his followers with such incendiary rhetoric. But what got me a bit surprised was his doubling down on this little trick of his to rally support around himself instead of responsibly ratcheting back on the calls to violence to smooth things over.

And then I sort'a chuckled when his supporters claimed themselves to be victims of the very violence they were egged into by Trump himself, of which they've managed to use in so many other ways.

Always the victims, never the bullies that Trump incited them to be.

I mean, what did Trump's knuckle dragging supporters expect with their calls to violence and their lashing out at any and all who would dare stand up to their shenanigans?

Trump is directly responsible for it all and he's still going at it, inciting violence and then claiming victimhood whenever this idiotic and dangerous ploy of his backfires in his face.
snowflakes so easily triggered. adulthood so missing with these sjw's.
 

MooseNSquirrel

Platinum Member
Feb 26, 2009
2,587
318
126
Strange, 16 is a kid in other circumstances. School shooting? A kid a child. Assaulted by a grown ass man while eating? An adult. So which is it? 16 a kid or adult, you can't have it both ways.

So many here ok with violence by the left. As I've said before, they left likes violence, racism, bigotry, if done to someone they think deserves it. Republicans, conservatives, gun owners, etc. More idiocy and hypocrisy, like from the above poster.

This is exactly what Waters wanted, people eating and being attacked. She's partly to blame.

Look at that beautiful straw man you've created. So tall! So big!

Heres a little somethign based in reality for you to enjoy!

“I’d like to punch him in the face”
“Maybe he should have been roughed up”
“You know, part of the problem, and part of the reason it takes so long, is nobody wants to hurt each other anymore, right”
“I don’t know if I’ll do the fighting myself or if other people will”
“The audience hit back. That’s what we need a little bit more of”
"If you do (hurt him), I’ll defend you in court, don’t worry about it”
“Knock the crap out of him, would you? I promise you, I will pay your legal fees”
 
  • Like
Reactions: greatnoob

greatnoob

Senior member
Jan 6, 2014
968
395
136
Look at that beautiful straw man you've created. So tall! So big!

Heres a little somethign based in reality for you to enjoy!

“I’d like to punch him in the face”
“Maybe he should have been roughed up”
“You know, part of the problem, and part of the reason it takes so long, is nobody wants to hurt each other anymore, right”
“I don’t know if I’ll do the fighting myself or if other people will”
“The audience hit back. That’s what we need a little bit more of”
"If you do (hurt him), I’ll defend you in court, don’t worry about it”
“Knock the crap out of him, would you? I promise you, I will pay your legal fees”

Hey, careful man. Clearly this one random man is the “left’s” representative so anything he does is a reflection of the left as a whole. But Trump? He is the president of the United States, he doesn’t represent his conservative base, don’t be silly. It’s not like as if conservatives voted him to be their representative.
 

cytg111

Lifer
Mar 17, 2008
26,591
15,910
136
late to this party but sounds like some type of assault to me. perhaps a double tap could be in order if circumstances warranted?
Double tap? Like two rounds to the chest? I know this place looks like lawless territory but there are some fine lines and we are missing a few ppl who got the boot for suggesting such things in the past.
 

Hugo Drax

Diamond Member
Nov 20, 2011
5,647
47
91
I am giving props to your guy, He stood up in the face of a formidable scrawny 16 year old and his single mom and took valiant action to stop the evils of trump by removing forcibly with swift action that dangerous hat he was wearing, and then finally he finishes off his foe with a coup de grace of softdrink to the face.

We need more men of honor like him to stand tall against the enemy and conduct himself honerably in combat actions. He deserves a combat action ribbon and a bronse star medal for this act of valor In service of the resistance.

Look we need more of this to make america great again.

Do I support Trump advocating violence. Do you?

No I dont. So now what? I guess because this Tough guy roughing up scrawny 16 year old kids and single mom is okay because he is on your side it makes this okay, since its war and all hands on deck to protect the eyes of the innocent to insure they are not damaged by the sight of one of those dangerous hats.

He should be getting his commendations for his valiant action under battle.
 

Bitek

Lifer
Aug 2, 2001
10,676
5,239
136
Well you should considering you're losing young white males by the hundreds who are now switching parties and getting red pilled thanks to shit like this. The media and Maxine Waters want violence, but not the consequences of the violence. You reap what you sow - oh there are more incidents like this but this was exceptionally poignant since it happened on the 4th amid the Reuters poll that young white males are fleeing the Dem party. Here's an up close and personal video example of why.

Great post. I like the part where you complain about Maxine Waters "spreading violence" after Cheetolini encouraged supporters to beat up protestors and he promised cover their legal bills.

Haha. Jokes on them. Trump never keeps promises nor pay his bills.
 

greatnoob

Senior member
Jan 6, 2014
968
395
136
No I dont. So now what? I guess because this Tough guy roughing up scrawny 16 year old kids and single mom is okay because he is on your side it makes this okay, since its war and all hands on deck to protect the eyes of the innocent to insure they are not damaged by the sight of one of those dangerous hats.

He should be getting his commendations for his valiant action under battle.

Why are you talking to yourself there bud?
 

JSt0rm

Lifer
Sep 5, 2000
27,399
3,948
126
No I dont. So now what? I guess because this Tough guy roughing up scrawny 16 year old kids and single mom is okay because he is on your side it makes this okay, since its war and all hands on deck to protect the eyes of the innocent to insure they are not damaged by the sight of one of those dangerous hats.

He should be getting his commendations for his valiant action under battle.

im glad of it.
 

cytg111

Lifer
Mar 17, 2008
26,591
15,910
136
I am not establishing equivalence, but “pushing back” is the same dog whistle nonsense that Trump and the alt-right use. To rationalize what Waters said or to applaud soda assault neckbeard is no less hypocritical. Equivalence is not a prerequisite for hypocrisy.

You will never convince Trump supporters that they are hypocrites.

You will however turn off the independent voters who find such behavior deplorable independent of political intent or affiliation.
Al Franken. There is your higher standard. Official policy too.
 
Mar 11, 2004
23,444
5,852
146
What you just quoted has nothing to do with fleeing. Do you know what you just quoted?

Yes, and if you'd bothered to follow what the OP said (or bothered to understand why I said what I did about the OP) you'd get why I posited it in such a manner. Since it needs to perpetually be explained to you or else you'll go on pointless pedantic diatribes: he talked about it in that manner, and I was putting his ignorance in context that he apparently understands it in.

Like I said, he has no interest in actually knowing what he's pushing forth. He doesn't understand that study was not about "fight or flight" and likewise ignores that they specifically say they'd guess conservatives would be even more likely to do what they found in the study, and other studies show they're even more averse to "threats". They also talk about how its not really unexpected (quite the opposite really) that people will do such, so its hardly a condemnation of liberals as the OP is trying to claim. Its the usual ignore everything but what they think it says because they recognize some words method of argument. This is a very consistent problem with the conservatives I've encountered and why they consistently bastardized science. They don't understand the underlying science of the topic but they think they do and are qualified to speak on it. Nevermind how its often blatantly clear they didn't even read the actual study because, just like with the OP, it explicitly disputes what they claim it shows.
 
  • Like
Reactions: cytg111

trenchfoot

Lifer
Aug 5, 2000
16,004
8,597
136
snowflakes so easily triggered. adulthood so missing with these sjw's.

Just stating the facts of the matter sir and being triggered is not in my nature as it was thoroughly beaten out of me while it was simultaneously beaten into me that remaining calm while terrorizing your foe is a win/win. ;)

And thank you for the effort you put into your reply. I appreciate it. :)
 

Starbuck1975

Lifer
Jan 6, 2005
14,698
1,909
126
Double tap? Like two rounds to the chest? I know this place looks like lawless territory but there are some fine lines and we are missing a few ppl who got the boot for suggesting such things in the past.
Double tap as in throwing Coca Cola at a bunch of teenagers, refilling it with Sprite and then hitting them again.