• We should now be fully online following an overnight outage. Apologies for any inconvenience, we do not expect there to be any further issues.

UNLV considures arming faculty.

Page 6 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.

Amused

Elite Member
Apr 14, 2001
57,387
19,687
146
Originally posted by: Mill
Originally posted by: Amused
Originally posted by: Mill

Umm...? I targeted your statement. You are the one that started personally attacking me. I'm through with this, though. Apparently you are on the rag today.

Your intentions and total stretch of logic was so obvious other people even pointed it out to you.

Just quit, dude. The longer you go on with this the more pathetic you look.

Now you are just plain delusional. One of your "fans" said that. What "other people" other than him even replied to what we were saying to each other?

:roll:

Get over yourself. You are not holy and omnipotent.

I never claimed I was. That's YOUR delusion. So much so that you feel the need to single me out and pull these silly bullsh!t logical fallacies on me in a vain attempt to "pwn" me.

Just stop making a fool of yourself and annoying the other posters, OK?

 

olds

Elite Member
Mar 3, 2000
50,124
779
126
Originally posted by: PrinceofWands
Originally posted by: illusion88
Originally posted by: BigJ
Originally posted by: illusion88
OMG ARE YOU PEOPLE INSANE??

I can't believe you. Even if someone else had a gun at VTech, do you really think they would have shot the killer? Is it there responsibility, their duty? Here in Utah, we had a shooting at a mall not too long ago. In this mall there were 6 people with CCW on them. Yet they hid and or ran, like they should have. It's not their job to take the law into their own hands. It's not any citizens job! It's not what you do!! Do you all want to be heroes is that it? Shoot the bad guy after he pops one or two people to prevent more loss of life. I hope one of you do, and I am going to laugh when they throw your ass in jail for murder.

What happened in UT and VA was a crime, but it is up to no one except the officers of the law to do anything about it. You people are crazy.

And yet an off-duty cop was credited with helping to distract the assailant and may have even fired the kill shot that ended the rampage in Utah. He was doing what at the time? Concealed carry.

But the major difference between him and every other CCW in the mall at the time is the fact that he is an off duty police officer. He is still a cop, regardless if he is on duty or not.

There is NOTHING special about a cop. They are not inherently better trained, more moral, more intelligent, more wise, stronger, faster, or anything else. They just happen to have a job that gives them a uniform. Furthermore there is NO requirement for a cop to risk himself to save anyones sorry butt. They make the EXACT same decisions as anyone else when they choose to respond.

I nominate this for one of the stupidest things I have ever read here.
M4H, you up for this?
 

Mill

Lifer
Oct 10, 1999
28,558
3
81
Originally posted by: Amused
Originally posted by: Mill
Originally posted by: Amused
Originally posted by: Mill

Umm...? I targeted your statement. You are the one that started personally attacking me. I'm through with this, though. Apparently you are on the rag today.

Your intentions and total stretch of logic was so obvious other people even pointed it out to you.

Just quit, dude. The longer you go on with this the more pathetic you look.

Now you are just plain delusional. One of your "fans" said that. What "other people" other than him even replied to what we were saying to each other?

:roll:

Get over yourself. You are not holy and omnipotent.

I never claimed I was. That's YOUR delusion. So much so that you feel the need to single me out and pull these silly bullsh!t logical fallacies on me in a vain attempt to "pwn" me.

Just stop making a fool of yourself and annoying the other posters, OK?

WTF are you talking about? Did you and Dave switch accounts or did you start injecting your Sustanon directly into your brain?
 

Amused

Elite Member
Apr 14, 2001
57,387
19,687
146
Originally posted by: Mill

WTF are you talking about? Did you and Dave switch accounts or did you start injecting your Sustanon directly into your brain?

Nice. Now you accuse me of taking steroids. :roll: Your pathetic jealousy is now so readily apparent, even the short bus riders could figure it out.

Go away little boy... adults are talking.
 
May 16, 2000
13,522
0
0
Originally posted by: oldsmoboat
Originally posted by: PrinceofWands
Originally posted by: illusion88
Originally posted by: BigJ
Originally posted by: illusion88
OMG ARE YOU PEOPLE INSANE??

I can't believe you. Even if someone else had a gun at VTech, do you really think they would have shot the killer? Is it there responsibility, their duty? Here in Utah, we had a shooting at a mall not too long ago. In this mall there were 6 people with CCW on them. Yet they hid and or ran, like they should have. It's not their job to take the law into their own hands. It's not any citizens job! It's not what you do!! Do you all want to be heroes is that it? Shoot the bad guy after he pops one or two people to prevent more loss of life. I hope one of you do, and I am going to laugh when they throw your ass in jail for murder.

What happened in UT and VA was a crime, but it is up to no one except the officers of the law to do anything about it. You people are crazy.

And yet an off-duty cop was credited with helping to distract the assailant and may have even fired the kill shot that ended the rampage in Utah. He was doing what at the time? Concealed carry.

But the major difference between him and every other CCW in the mall at the time is the fact that he is an off duty police officer. He is still a cop, regardless if he is on duty or not.

There is NOTHING special about a cop. They are not inherently better trained, more moral, more intelligent, more wise, stronger, faster, or anything else. They just happen to have a job that gives them a uniform. Furthermore there is NO requirement for a cop to risk himself to save anyones sorry butt. They make the EXACT same decisions as anyone else when they choose to respond.

I nominate this for one of the stupidest things I have ever read here.
M4H, you up for this?

It's completely true. Don't get me wrong, I respect someone who does the job, but they have no special abilities over anyone else. I've been through enough leo training to know that it's no better than private equivalents, and often it's not even that good. People who think police have some special abilities or something are truly deluded.

As for the requirement to risk that's already been addressed by the courts and they support what I said.
 

AgentJean

Banned
Jun 7, 2006
1,280
0
0
Originally posted by: illusion88
OMG ARE YOU PEOPLE INSANE??

I can't believe you. Even if someone else had a gun at VTech, do you really think they would have shot the killer? Is it there responsibility, their duty? Here in Utah, we had a shooting at a mall not too long ago. In this mall there were 6 people with CCW on them. Yet they hid and or ran, like they should have. It's not their job to take the law into their own hands. It's not any citizens job! It's not what you do!! Do you all want to be heroes is that it? Shoot the bad guy after he pops one or two people to prevent more loss of life. I hope one of you do, and I am going to laugh when they throw your ass in jail for murder.

What happened in UT and VA was a crime, but it is up to no one except the officers of the law to do anything about it. You people are crazy.


Yeah, a lot of people have misconceptions of what it means to have a Concealed Weapons Permit. It does not give you a license to be a "hero"(Hero's get other people killed).

If I'm at the local Mall and some nut wants to shoot up Penny's while I'm at Dick's Sporting goods I'm not getting involved. I will make a tactical withdraw to my car and leave.

On the other hand if some thugs start shooting up Dairy Queen and interrupt my ice cream enjoyment....it will be drawn down and double tap time.

The difference in the situations are; at DQ I'm in the line of fire; my life is in danger. I shoot back or die.

At Dicks on the other hand, I'm not in danger and there is no need to put myself in danger. The sheeple getting slaughtered at Penny's better hope someone in that field of fire is in conceal carry mode.

I'm only out to protect me and mine. Not mindless sheep(like YOU illusion88) who see me as a threat or some gun nut borderline shooting up some office building just because I happen to take the time and money to get licensed by the state to carry a concealed handgun and to become proficient with my carry weapon in order to take personal responsibility for my safety(and the safety those with me)

Also, you're statement about getting thown in jail for killing a $h!tbag after he "pops" two people is WRONG. Unless you live in communist places like California, DC, New York City, or Chicago. You will not be charged. You most likley will be taken in for questioning and a statement and your firearm taken into evidence(for the investigation). However you will be opened up to civil lawsuits by Mrs $h!tbag. Hope you're lucky enough to live in Flordia or any other state who has castle doctrine law and civil suit protection in cases of justified self defense.

Best of luck to you illusion88. You most certainly will be a lamb to the slaughter when SHTF.
 
Jun 27, 2005
19,216
1
61
Originally posted by: PrinceofWands
Originally posted by: illusion88
Originally posted by: BigJ
Originally posted by: illusion88
OMG ARE YOU PEOPLE INSANE??

I can't believe you. Even if someone else had a gun at VTech, do you really think they would have shot the killer? Is it there responsibility, their duty? Here in Utah, we had a shooting at a mall not too long ago. In this mall there were 6 people with CCW on them. Yet they hid and or ran, like they should have. It's not their job to take the law into their own hands. It's not any citizens job! It's not what you do!! Do you all want to be heroes is that it? Shoot the bad guy after he pops one or two people to prevent more loss of life. I hope one of you do, and I am going to laugh when they throw your ass in jail for murder.

What happened in UT and VA was a crime, but it is up to no one except the officers of the law to do anything about it. You people are crazy.

And yet an off-duty cop was credited with helping to distract the assailant and may have even fired the kill shot that ended the rampage in Utah. He was doing what at the time? Concealed carry.

But the major difference between him and every other CCW in the mall at the time is the fact that he is an off duty police officer. He is still a cop, regardless if he is on duty or not.

There is NOTHING special about a cop. They are not inherently better trained, more moral, more intelligent, more wise, stronger, faster, or anything else. They just happen to have a job that gives them a uniform. Furthermore there is NO requirement for a cop to risk himself to save anyones sorry butt. They make the EXACT same decisions as anyone else when they choose to respond.

I think you mean TSA Agent... not Cop.

IIRC... and I could be wrong here... But I'm pretty sure that there are these places called POLICE ACADEMIES and prospective cops have to go there for MONTHS and learn all sorts of COP stuff.
 

crt1530

Diamond Member
Apr 15, 2001
3,194
0
0
Originally posted by: MercenaryForHire
Originally posted by: AnandTech Moderator
That's enough you two.

ALERT: LOCK IMMINENT :Q

Please don't delete it, it's been tagged for OOTY2007 :D

- M4H
I am unfamiliar with this acronym. Please explain.
 
May 16, 2000
13,522
0
0
Originally posted by: Whoozyerdaddy
Originally posted by: PrinceofWands
Originally posted by: illusion88
Originally posted by: BigJ
Originally posted by: illusion88
OMG ARE YOU PEOPLE INSANE??

I can't believe you. Even if someone else had a gun at VTech, do you really think they would have shot the killer? Is it there responsibility, their duty? Here in Utah, we had a shooting at a mall not too long ago. In this mall there were 6 people with CCW on them. Yet they hid and or ran, like they should have. It's not their job to take the law into their own hands. It's not any citizens job! It's not what you do!! Do you all want to be heroes is that it? Shoot the bad guy after he pops one or two people to prevent more loss of life. I hope one of you do, and I am going to laugh when they throw your ass in jail for murder.

What happened in UT and VA was a crime, but it is up to no one except the officers of the law to do anything about it. You people are crazy.

And yet an off-duty cop was credited with helping to distract the assailant and may have even fired the kill shot that ended the rampage in Utah. He was doing what at the time? Concealed carry.

But the major difference between him and every other CCW in the mall at the time is the fact that he is an off duty police officer. He is still a cop, regardless if he is on duty or not.

There is NOTHING special about a cop. They are not inherently better trained, more moral, more intelligent, more wise, stronger, faster, or anything else. They just happen to have a job that gives them a uniform. Furthermore there is NO requirement for a cop to risk himself to save anyones sorry butt. They make the EXACT same decisions as anyone else when they choose to respond.

I think you mean TSA Agent... not Cop.

IIRC... and I could be wrong here... But I'm pretty sure that there are these places called POLICE ACADEMIES and prospective cops have to go there for MONTHS and learn all sorts of COP stuff.

Yes, but it's like training for any job in that it covers a WIDE variety of skills/topics, as well as a bunch of garbage. What I mean is if you take any specific skill of a police officer (marksmanship, understanding of law, self-defense, etc) there is an equal or better civilian equivalent. Just because you're a cop doesn't mean you're a good shot for instance...in fact it's quite common for them to be fairly dismal and have trouble passing their requalifications. That's the case with pretty much everything. Then there's issues like intelligence, wisdom, morality, etc. Obviously that's the same as for anyone else so there's no increased likelihood of an officer having any of those either. Therefore to claim superiority of someone just because they're a cop is silly. They're nothing more than adequately trained for their job. Any civilian 'could' have exactly the same knowledge, skills, etc. Or they could have more or less of course. Point is, being a cop doesn't make you inherently better at anything, including responding to emergencies.
 
Jun 27, 2005
19,216
1
61
Originally posted by: PrinceofWands
Originally posted by: Whoozyerdaddy
Originally posted by: PrinceofWands
Originally posted by: illusion88
Originally posted by: BigJ
Originally posted by: illusion88
OMG ARE YOU PEOPLE INSANE??

I can't believe you. Even if someone else had a gun at VTech, do you really think they would have shot the killer? Is it there responsibility, their duty? Here in Utah, we had a shooting at a mall not too long ago. In this mall there were 6 people with CCW on them. Yet they hid and or ran, like they should have. It's not their job to take the law into their own hands. It's not any citizens job! It's not what you do!! Do you all want to be heroes is that it? Shoot the bad guy after he pops one or two people to prevent more loss of life. I hope one of you do, and I am going to laugh when they throw your ass in jail for murder.

What happened in UT and VA was a crime, but it is up to no one except the officers of the law to do anything about it. You people are crazy.

And yet an off-duty cop was credited with helping to distract the assailant and may have even fired the kill shot that ended the rampage in Utah. He was doing what at the time? Concealed carry.

But the major difference between him and every other CCW in the mall at the time is the fact that he is an off duty police officer. He is still a cop, regardless if he is on duty or not.

There is NOTHING special about a cop. They are not inherently better trained, more moral, more intelligent, more wise, stronger, faster, or anything else. They just happen to have a job that gives them a uniform. Furthermore there is NO requirement for a cop to risk himself to save anyones sorry butt. They make the EXACT same decisions as anyone else when they choose to respond.

I think you mean TSA Agent... not Cop.

IIRC... and I could be wrong here... But I'm pretty sure that there are these places called POLICE ACADEMIES and prospective cops have to go there for MONTHS and learn all sorts of COP stuff.

Yes, but it's like training for any job in that it covers a WIDE variety of skills/topics, as well as a bunch of garbage. What I mean is if you take any specific skill of a police officer (marksmanship, understanding of law, self-defense, etc) there is an equal or better civilian equivalent. Just because you're a cop doesn't mean you're a good shot for instance...in fact it's quite common for them to be fairly dismal and have trouble passing their requalifications. That's the case with pretty much everything. Then there's issues like intelligence, wisdom, morality, etc. Obviously that's the same as for anyone else so there's no increased likelihood of an officer having any of those either. Therefore to claim superiority of someone just because they're a cop is silly. They're nothing more than adequately trained for their job. Any civilian 'could' have exactly the same knowledge, skills, etc. Or they could have more or less of course. Point is, being a cop doesn't make you inherently better at anything, including responding to emergencies.

So in your mind Judy the perfume counter girl is just as qualified to handle a crisis as a cop?

I mean really... Sure there are lots of civillian classes that one can take for self defense, marksmanship, law, etc... but how many civilians have taken them? 100% of cops have. While there may be citizens out there who are more qualified than a cop to handle some situations I'm not willing to rely on the percentages.

An average cop > an average citizen in most crisis situations
 

BigJ

Lifer
Nov 18, 2001
21,330
1
81
Originally posted by: Whoozyerdaddy

So in your mind Judy the perfume counter girl is just as qualified to handle a crisis as a cop?

I mean really... Sure there are lots of civillian classes that one can take for self defense, marksmanship, law, etc... but how many civilians have taken them? 100% of cops have. While there may be citizens out there who are more qualified than a cop to handle some situations I'm not willing to rely on the percentages.

An average cop > an average citizen in most crisis situations

I'd assume he's talking about civilians that carry vs. police officers, not Judy the perfume counter girl vs. Judge Dredd.
 
May 16, 2000
13,522
0
0
Originally posted by: Whoozyerdaddy
Originally posted by: PrinceofWands
Originally posted by: Whoozyerdaddy
Originally posted by: PrinceofWands
Originally posted by: illusion88
Originally posted by: BigJ
Originally posted by: illusion88
OMG ARE YOU PEOPLE INSANE??

I can't believe you. Even if someone else had a gun at VTech, do you really think they would have shot the killer? Is it there responsibility, their duty? Here in Utah, we had a shooting at a mall not too long ago. In this mall there were 6 people with CCW on them. Yet they hid and or ran, like they should have. It's not their job to take the law into their own hands. It's not any citizens job! It's not what you do!! Do you all want to be heroes is that it? Shoot the bad guy after he pops one or two people to prevent more loss of life. I hope one of you do, and I am going to laugh when they throw your ass in jail for murder.

What happened in UT and VA was a crime, but it is up to no one except the officers of the law to do anything about it. You people are crazy.

And yet an off-duty cop was credited with helping to distract the assailant and may have even fired the kill shot that ended the rampage in Utah. He was doing what at the time? Concealed carry.

But the major difference between him and every other CCW in the mall at the time is the fact that he is an off duty police officer. He is still a cop, regardless if he is on duty or not.

There is NOTHING special about a cop. They are not inherently better trained, more moral, more intelligent, more wise, stronger, faster, or anything else. They just happen to have a job that gives them a uniform. Furthermore there is NO requirement for a cop to risk himself to save anyones sorry butt. They make the EXACT same decisions as anyone else when they choose to respond.

I think you mean TSA Agent... not Cop.

IIRC... and I could be wrong here... But I'm pretty sure that there are these places called POLICE ACADEMIES and prospective cops have to go there for MONTHS and learn all sorts of COP stuff.

Yes, but it's like training for any job in that it covers a WIDE variety of skills/topics, as well as a bunch of garbage. What I mean is if you take any specific skill of a police officer (marksmanship, understanding of law, self-defense, etc) there is an equal or better civilian equivalent. Just because you're a cop doesn't mean you're a good shot for instance...in fact it's quite common for them to be fairly dismal and have trouble passing their requalifications. That's the case with pretty much everything. Then there's issues like intelligence, wisdom, morality, etc. Obviously that's the same as for anyone else so there's no increased likelihood of an officer having any of those either. Therefore to claim superiority of someone just because they're a cop is silly. They're nothing more than adequately trained for their job. Any civilian 'could' have exactly the same knowledge, skills, etc. Or they could have more or less of course. Point is, being a cop doesn't make you inherently better at anything, including responding to emergencies.

So in your mind Judy the perfume counter girl is just as qualified to handle a crisis as a cop?

I mean really... Sure there are lots of civillian classes that one can take for self defense, marksmanship, law, etc... but how many civilians have taken them? 100% of cops have. While there may be citizens out there who are more qualified than a cop to handle some situations I'm not willing to rely on the percentages.

An average cop > an average citizen in most crisis situations

I'd agree to a point, but that's not where the original comments were coming from. Originally there was the inference that only cops were in any way able or allowed to handle an emergency, and that's just ridiculous. Both because it inflates the ability of cops and because it ignores the abilities of citizens.
 

AgentJean

Banned
Jun 7, 2006
1,280
0
0
Originally posted by: BigJ
Originally posted by: Whoozyerdaddy

So in your mind Judy the perfume counter girl is just as qualified to handle a crisis as a cop?

I mean really... Sure there are lots of civillian classes that one can take for self defense, marksmanship, law, etc... but how many civilians have taken them? 100% of cops have. While there may be citizens out there who are more qualified than a cop to handle some situations I'm not willing to rely on the percentages.

An average cop > an average citizen in most crisis situations

I'd assume he's talking about civilians that carry vs. police officers, not Judy the perfume counter girl vs. Judge Dredd.

What he doesn't know is that Judy the perfume girl's daddy (never having a son) taught Judy everything he knew about firearms and how to shoot. She spent many weekends at the range with the oldman when she was younger.

Judy now being an adult and taking responsibilty for her safty has a consealed carry permit and still practices regularly. Her accuracy is better than the average city cop. She could even give Judge Dredd a run for his money. :D

Assumtions are deadly. More so for Whoozyerdaddy thinking Judy would be a easy victum.


 

BoberFett

Lifer
Oct 9, 1999
37,562
9
81
Originally posted by: oldsmoboat
There is NOTHING special about a cop. They are not inherently better trained, more moral, more intelligent, more wise, stronger, faster, or anything else. They just happen to have a job that gives them a uniform. Furthermore there is NO requirement for a cop to risk himself to save anyones sorry butt. They make the EXACT same decisions as anyone else when they choose to respond.

I nominate this for one of the stupidest things I have ever read here.
M4H, you up for this?[/quote]

Why? He's correct. The Supreme Court ruled that the police have no duty to protect any individual.
 

RichardE

Banned
Dec 31, 2005
10,246
2
0
Originally posted by: PrinceofWands
Originally posted by: Whoozyerdaddy
Originally posted by: PrinceofWands
Originally posted by: illusion88
Originally posted by: BigJ
Originally posted by: illusion88
OMG ARE YOU PEOPLE INSANE??

I can't believe you. Even if someone else had a gun at VTech, do you really think they would have shot the killer? Is it there responsibility, their duty? Here in Utah, we had a shooting at a mall not too long ago. In this mall there were 6 people with CCW on them. Yet they hid and or ran, like they should have. It's not their job to take the law into their own hands. It's not any citizens job! It's not what you do!! Do you all want to be heroes is that it? Shoot the bad guy after he pops one or two people to prevent more loss of life. I hope one of you do, and I am going to laugh when they throw your ass in jail for murder.

What happened in UT and VA was a crime, but it is up to no one except the officers of the law to do anything about it. You people are crazy.

And yet an off-duty cop was credited with helping to distract the assailant and may have even fired the kill shot that ended the rampage in Utah. He was doing what at the time? Concealed carry.

But the major difference between him and every other CCW in the mall at the time is the fact that he is an off duty police officer. He is still a cop, regardless if he is on duty or not.

There is NOTHING special about a cop. They are not inherently better trained, more moral, more intelligent, more wise, stronger, faster, or anything else. They just happen to have a job that gives them a uniform. Furthermore there is NO requirement for a cop to risk himself to save anyones sorry butt. They make the EXACT same decisions as anyone else when they choose to respond.

I think you mean TSA Agent... not Cop.

IIRC... and I could be wrong here... But I'm pretty sure that there are these places called POLICE ACADEMIES and prospective cops have to go there for MONTHS and learn all sorts of COP stuff.

Yes, but it's like training for any job in that it covers a WIDE variety of skills/topics, as well as a bunch of garbage. What I mean is if you take any specific skill of a police officer (marksmanship, understanding of law, self-defense, etc) there is an equal or better civilian equivalent. Just because you're a cop doesn't mean you're a good shot for instance...in fact it's quite common for them to be fairly dismal and have trouble passing their requalifications. That's the case with pretty much everything. Then there's issues like intelligence, wisdom, morality, etc. Obviously that's the same as for anyone else so there's no increased likelihood of an officer having any of those either. Therefore to claim superiority of someone just because they're a cop is silly. They're nothing more than adequately trained for their job. Any civilian 'could' have exactly the same knowledge, skills, etc. Or they could have more or less of course. Point is, being a cop doesn't make you inherently better at anything, including responding to emergencies.

I am pretty sure 500 pound Bubba, who has trouble breathing and lil old 24 year blond college girl who never shot a gun in her life save to get the safety training for her CCW will have less of a chance of living versus a police officer whose job is to be prepared for these situations. As it stands, if I lined up 100 Citizens chosen at random from a mall how many could you say could take down a mall shooter? It would be a shot in the dark

If I lined up 100 police officers, you could reasonably say that because of the standard of training they go through, every one of them would have a good shot at taking down the mall shooter.

So sorry, your "cops are no better than anyone else" opinion is seriously flawed.
 

Vic

Elite Member
Jun 12, 2001
50,422
14,337
136
NEWSFLASH!! This just in! Cops are people too!

:Q

:roll:


I really don't understand the need that some people have to deify authority. Arguably, police are experts in their given profession (at least we would hope so), but that's where it ends. Given them the right to possess weapons while revoking the right from the rest of us is about as un-democratic an idea I've ever heard of.
 
May 16, 2000
13,522
0
0
Originally posted by: RichardE
Originally posted by: PrinceofWands
Originally posted by: Whoozyerdaddy
Originally posted by: PrinceofWands
Originally posted by: illusion88
Originally posted by: BigJ
Originally posted by: illusion88
OMG ARE YOU PEOPLE INSANE??

I can't believe you. Even if someone else had a gun at VTech, do you really think they would have shot the killer? Is it there responsibility, their duty? Here in Utah, we had a shooting at a mall not too long ago. In this mall there were 6 people with CCW on them. Yet they hid and or ran, like they should have. It's not their job to take the law into their own hands. It's not any citizens job! It's not what you do!! Do you all want to be heroes is that it? Shoot the bad guy after he pops one or two people to prevent more loss of life. I hope one of you do, and I am going to laugh when they throw your ass in jail for murder.

What happened in UT and VA was a crime, but it is up to no one except the officers of the law to do anything about it. You people are crazy.

And yet an off-duty cop was credited with helping to distract the assailant and may have even fired the kill shot that ended the rampage in Utah. He was doing what at the time? Concealed carry.

But the major difference between him and every other CCW in the mall at the time is the fact that he is an off duty police officer. He is still a cop, regardless if he is on duty or not.

There is NOTHING special about a cop. They are not inherently better trained, more moral, more intelligent, more wise, stronger, faster, or anything else. They just happen to have a job that gives them a uniform. Furthermore there is NO requirement for a cop to risk himself to save anyones sorry butt. They make the EXACT same decisions as anyone else when they choose to respond.

I think you mean TSA Agent... not Cop.

IIRC... and I could be wrong here... But I'm pretty sure that there are these places called POLICE ACADEMIES and prospective cops have to go there for MONTHS and learn all sorts of COP stuff.

Yes, but it's like training for any job in that it covers a WIDE variety of skills/topics, as well as a bunch of garbage. What I mean is if you take any specific skill of a police officer (marksmanship, understanding of law, self-defense, etc) there is an equal or better civilian equivalent. Just because you're a cop doesn't mean you're a good shot for instance...in fact it's quite common for them to be fairly dismal and have trouble passing their requalifications. That's the case with pretty much everything. Then there's issues like intelligence, wisdom, morality, etc. Obviously that's the same as for anyone else so there's no increased likelihood of an officer having any of those either. Therefore to claim superiority of someone just because they're a cop is silly. They're nothing more than adequately trained for their job. Any civilian 'could' have exactly the same knowledge, skills, etc. Or they could have more or less of course. Point is, being a cop doesn't make you inherently better at anything, including responding to emergencies.

I am pretty sure 500 pound Bubba, who has trouble breathing and lil old 24 year blond college girl who never shot a gun in her life save to get the safety training for her CCW will have less of a chance of living versus a police officer whose job is to be prepared for these situations. As it stands, if I lined up 100 Citizens chosen at random from a mall how many could you say could take down a mall shooter? It would be a shot in the dark

If I lined up 100 police officers, you could reasonably say that because of the standard of training they go through, every one of them would have a good shot at taking down the mall shooter.

So sorry, your "cops are no better than anyone else" opinion is seriously flawed.

I disagree completely. Rather or not individuals choose to train themselves in matters of combat is beyond the scope of the conversation. The point is that police are not more intelligent, not more moral, not more capable, etc. The point was that anyone could be equally or superiorly capable without being a police officer. I never said everyone is more ready for combat, I said anyone could be and police weren't somehow endowed with special abilities by nature of their career choice. That stands as simple fact.

As to who can drop a mall shooter, the answer is absolutely anyone, trained or not. Humans are naturally endowed with an impressive set of abilities...adrenaline raises strength, stress heightens focus, etc. Anyone who has fired a gun once a year for a couple years is equally trained in marksmanship as most law enforcement is, and most people I know who carry concealed practice a heck of a lot more than that. Let's not forget that the mall shooter is on equal footing with everyone else regarding opportunities for training and ability, so anyone has as much chance against him as he has against them. Furthermore the ONLY person who has a chance against a mall shooter is the person who's there when the shooting starts. I don't give a damn if Ad Topperwein is on the local police force...if he isn't in the mall when it starts then my grandmother has more chance to drop the shooter than he does.

I'd sure as hell rather see people at least trying to save themselves and those around them instead of praying the cavalry shows up in time. Anyone who claims that people don't even have that right to try is, quite frankly, more dangerous than the shooters themselves.

Edit: I just thought I'd go a bit further to counter the 'average joe' comments that always seem to creep up in these discussions. I live in a county of 30,000 people. I thought I'd give a brief synopsis of the people most often around me in order to establish who you are likely to run into in the local mall. I note hunting experience not only for shooting experience but also for the ideas related to stalking prey, which does apply even when the prey is human. Anyone listed as a ccw holder has not only taken numerous classes (from me or others on the list), but also goes shooting at least 4-6 times a year to keep in practice. I note fireman/nurse/emt or other emergency services to suggest experience responding to emergencies (obviously military personnel are also in this category). Numbers are roughly rounded as I don't always remember exactly (but I tend to remember if they were in the military long enough to retire, etc).

Me: 2 years military, 12 years security, expert marksman, ccw holder, firearm instructor, self-defense instructor
Father: 3 years military, expert marksman, lifetime hunter
Brother: ccw holder, 10 years martial arts training
Sister-in-law: ccw holder, 2 years martial arts training
Nephew: 6 years martial arts training, amateur mma fighter, ccw holder
Nephew's best friend: lifetime hunter, ccw holder
Sister: 4 years military, expert marksman, ccw holder
Sister's boyfriend: retired police officer, ccw holder
Ex-brother-in-law: 4 years military, expert marksman, ccw holder, lifetime hunter, volunteer police officer, volunteer fireman/emt
Sister's best friend: 16 years military, expert marksman, trauma nurse, ccw holder
Sister's best friend's boyfriend: 20+ years military, expert marksman, fireman, ccw holder
Friend #1: prior reserve police officer, firearm instructor, 15-20 years security, ccw holder
Friend #2: 10 years martial arts training, ccw holder
Friend #2 wife: ccw holder
Optometrist: firearm instructor, 18 years military, expert marksman, ccw holder
History teacher #1: 6 years military, expert marksman, firearm instructor, ccw holder
History teacher #2: firearm instructor, expert marksman, nationally ranked marksman, ccw holder
Pharmacist: firearm instructor, expert marksman, ccw holder
Supervisor: former reserve police officer, expert marksman, ccw holder, lifetime hunter
Manager: ccw holder, firearm instructor, lifetime hunter
Co-worker #1: 8 years military, expert marksman, retired police officer, ccw holder
Co-worker #2: 4 years military, ccw holder
Friend from gym: 2 years military, ccw holder
Ex-co-worker from gym: ex reserve police officer, 12 years martial arts, professional mma fighter
Librarian: self-defense instructor, firearm instructor, lifetime of martial arts, ccw holder


So there's 25 semi-random people living in a small town who I would rate as equal to any on-duty officer in matters of combat and/or emergency response. If you wanted 75 more I could probably come up with them by thinking about it for a while. Granted that's only 100 out of 30,000...but those are also just the ones that I personally know and interact with frequently. You have to imagine that there are plenty more out there. Generally speaking the 'average joe's' you see on the street are fairly likely to have some combat or emergency response experience. Maybe not on par with a 20 year police veteran, but more than adequate to match a random shooter.
 

AgentJean

Banned
Jun 7, 2006
1,280
0
0
Originally posted by: PrinceofWands

I'd sure as hell rather see people at least trying to save themselves and those around them instead of praying the cavalry shows up in time. Anyone who claims that people don't even have that right to try is, quite frankly, more dangerous than the shooters themselves.

That reminds me of this deeply religous missionary guy who spent quite a bit of time spreading the word of god in Africa. He belived in the end God would save him.







He was also extremely proficient in a varity of small arms(including full auto weapons). He said his arsenal was to hold of the bad guys until God showed up.
 

IEC

Elite Member
Super Moderator
Jun 10, 2004
14,600
6,084
136
There is NOTHING special about a cop. They are not inherently better trained, more moral, more intelligent, more wise, stronger, faster, or anything else. They just happen to have a job that gives them a uniform. Furthermore there is NO requirement for a cop to risk himself to save anyones sorry butt. They make the EXACT same decisions as anyone else when they choose to respond.

BWAHAHHAAA... *gasp*

1. Inherently better trained - what are police academies for? Duh.
2. More moral? Perhaps not, but it's their job to enforce the law and that's what they do...
3. More intelligent? You don't need to be the sharpest knife, just quick where it counts
4. More wise? Who the hell cares... they're not the ones making the laws
5. Stronger, faster, etc? Hell, most officers I know are ex-Marines, ex-Army, etc. While the traffic-cop donut patrols may be getting fat there are plenty of tough cops out there.
6. Police officers are more willing to put themselves in harm's way than the average citizen. This is due to police academy training as well as previous military background for many officers.
7. Sure there are corrupt/bad cops. But most of the ones I've known are good guys who do their job right.