Unigine 'Heaven' DX11 Benchmark 3.0 released

[taltamir]

It does. And not only that, but I don't necessarily agree that most people leave it at defaults. The majority of runs I've seen use AA (which is not a default setting), and some bump the AF and Tess settings higher as well.

AF below 16x is stupid, and yet the default is 4x.
If I can't do AF of 16x I will lower quality elsewhere, I don't know why anyone would ever play a game with AF under 16x.

 

[hclarkjr]

ran it just now and got this score -

Heaven Benchmark v3.0 Basic

FPS:118.7
Scores:2990
Min FPS:40.6
Max FPS:213.3
Hardware

Binary:Windows 32bit Visual C++ 1600 Release Mar 7 2012
Operating system:Windows 7 (build 7601, Service Pack 1) 64bit
CPU model:Intel(R) Core(TM) i7-2600K CPU @ 3.40GHz
CPU flags:3409MHz MMX SSE SSE2 SSE3 SSSE3 SSE41 SSE42 HTT
GPU model:AMD Radeon HD 6900 Series 8.940.0.0 CrossFireX 2048Mb
Settings

Render:direct3d11
Mode:1920x1200 fullscreen
Shaders:high
Textures:high
Filter:trilinear
Anisotropy:4x
Occlusion:enabled
Refraction:enabled
Volumetric:enabled
Tessellation:disabled

no stuttering on my crossfired system, ran smooth all the way through the benchmark

interesting results, i just installed windows 8 pro today and ran this benchmark with the default drivers that windows 8 installed. everything is the same except of course 7 to 8

Heaven Benchmark v3.0 Basic

FPS:118.9
Scores:2994
Min FPS:45.5
Max FPS:210.9
Hardware

Binary:Windows 32bit Visual C++ 1600 Release Mar 7 2012
Operating system:Windows NT 6.2 (build 9200) 64bit
CPU model:Intel(R) Core(TM) i7-2600K CPU @ 3.40GHz
CPU flags:3409MHz MMX SSE SSE2 SSE3 SSSE3 SSE41 SSE42 HTT
GPU model:AMD Radeon HD 6900 Series (Microsoft Corporation - WDDM v1.20) 8.97.10.6 CrossFireX 2048Mb
Settings

Render:direct3d11
Mode:1920x1200 fullscreen
Shaders:high
Textures:high
Filter:trilinear
Anisotropy:4x
Occlusion:enabled
Refraction:enabled
Volumetric:enabled
Tessellation:disabled

 

[pandemonium]

The minimum FPS can easily fluctuate between tests. I wouldn't think anything of it unless this was the average of say, 5 tests back to back. It is curious though and warrants more diagnosis.

 

[hclarkjr]

interesting results, i just installed windows 8 pro today and ran this benchmark with the default drivers that windows 8 installed. everything is the same except of course 7 to 8

Heaven Benchmark v3.0 Basic

FPS:118.9
Scores:2994
Min FPS:45.5
Max FPS:210.9
Hardware

Binary:Windows 32bit Visual C++ 1600 Release Mar 7 2012
Operating system:Windows NT 6.2 (build 9200) 64bit
CPU model:Intel(R) Core(TM) i7-2600K CPU @ 3.40GHz
CPU flags:3409MHz MMX SSE SSE2 SSE3 SSSE3 SSE41 SSE42 HTT
GPU model:AMD Radeon HD 6900 Series (Microsoft Corporation - WDDM v1.20) 8.97.10.6 CrossFireX 2048Mb
Settings

Render:direct3d11
Mode:1920x1200 fullscreen
Shaders:high
Textures:high
Filter:trilinear
Anisotropy:4x
Occlusion:enabled
Refraction:enabled
Volumetric:enabled
Tessellation:disabled

just installed the new drivers and seen minimal improvement over the built in driver. oddly 3dmark11 refuses to run with either driver for me. locks computer up

Heaven Benchmark v3.0 Basic

FPS:119.4
Scores:3007
Min FPS:41.8
Max FPS:211.4
Hardware

Binary:Windows 32bit Visual C++ 1600 Release Mar 7 2012
Operating system:Windows NT 6.2 (build 9200) 64bit
CPU model:Intel(R) Core(TM) i7-2600K CPU @ 3.40GHz
CPU flags:3409MHz MMX SSE SSE2 SSE3 SSSE3 SSE41 SSE42 HTT
GPU model:AMD Radeon HD 6900 Series 8.982.0.0 CrossFireX 2048Mb
Settings

Render:direct3d11
Mode:1920x1200 fullscreen
Shaders:high
Textures:high
Filter:trilinear
Anisotropy:4x
Occlusion:enabled
Refraction:enabled
Volumetric:enabled
Tessellation:disabled