That's not what I said, but you might have inferred that. The second group WERE considered lesbians, BUT ALSO OCCASIONALLY BISEXUAL. But please, do go on.
Any self-proclaimed lesbian who has sexual relations with men is not a lesbian. No ifs, no buts. A person who has sex with members of both genders (no matter how occasionally) is bisexual, regardless of whether they mainly have sex with those of their own gender.
Yet, when he made unsubstantiated ad hominem points about ME, he was magically elevated beyond troll status
You attempted to make an informative statement which made you look foolish. He said it made you look foolish. You think it was unsubstantiated, I don't because the evidence was there. You however said that he was... off the top of my head... feminised, for example? What was your basis for that?
Which then somehow trumps all my personal experiences with my *** sister and her catty girlfriends.
Foolish statements tend to devalue anything else you have to say, as do the use of terms that are generally considered to be derogatory, such as '***'.
Not at all, because even straight parents may also try to keep up a false facade to their children all the time. They might leave the room to argue, or stop arguing when the kids wanders in the room. Why would you expect it to be more difficult for a lesbian couple to do the same thing? And his 2 mom's lesbian friends and relatives won't exactly be sharing their many little flings
and fights with him, either, and if they did, that would be just plain weird because it is none of his business.
Bear in mind that your point was that there were "two types of lesbian", the lesbian type of lesbian being the man hating type. I think a boy might spot that, or at least, you know, 'get a vibe'.
If you read all my posts a little closer next time, you would see just how stupid your homophobe comments really are about me, Sigmund.
"You're stupid!" "No, you're stupid!" "You!" "You!"
. You're not really making a point here. Either you've got something useful to say, couple it with an insult if you feel that it helps get your point across (hint: It very likely doesn't), or don't. An insult without any justification just makes you look a bit... foolish. If I infer from your comment regarding 'your gay friends' that you are gay, I don't know whether homophobe is still the right word, I'll stand corrected if someone points out that there is a more correct word regarding people who treat lesbians in any way as second class.
And I could also add a lot of irrationally hateful men into that defective gene pool I dislike, too, just so you don't have to feel all left out.
Unsubstantiated ad hominem again, unless you'd care to point out what shows me to be an irrational hateful man, or what might be defective about my genes...?
As in, YOUR EXPERIENCES MAY NOT MATCH MINE.
Insightful stuff. Considering that you chose to share it with others, you must think that it has some value. Why did you share it? If the only confirmed lesbians I had met had blonde hair, would that be a useful contribution to a discussion on the topic? How about if they had chronic cases of halitosis, or wonderful singing voices?
And why did you choose to write everything in bold?
Facebook
Twitter