Understanding Lesbianism

Page 4 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.

SlickSnake

Diamond Member
May 29, 2007
5,235
2
0
Like any group it's impossible to generalize lesbians. I once had a relationship with a lesbian girl, we shared a connection. . . An openness of communication on a physical level. Our eyes lit up when we talked and we were just attracted to each other. She wasn't really attracted to my body all though, and we were young so things did not work out in the long run. The impulses and stimuli that govern a persons sexuality and personal relationships are very complicated, and are impossible to generalize often in my experience. Some people are simpler than others though.

The most important thing in a relationship is communication in it's many forms. In my observation it isn't so much the hardware but the chemistry that excites at the most important levels, regardless of sexuality.

There are 2 distinct groups of lesbos I know of, since my sister is one. Group one is a hard core, man hating, chop off that wiener group, who thinks all women are perfect Gods and all men need just need to die horrible deaths already and get out of their way. These militant dykes make Amazon warriors look like Mother Teresa. They also usually despise the flip-flopping lesbos in the second group with a passion.

The second group is a much more bisexual, free love type of lesbo. She may be married for 10 or 15 years, then suddenly fall in love with a girlfriend and leave her husband and kids for a fling or 2, then go right back with her husband again, and even do this countless times, leaving the family in a perpetual state of turmoil. This group will often intermingle with the first group, since this group usually also has a lot better looking girls in it, for one thing.

That is my experience with lesbos due to my sister, but your mileage may vary.

And I need to add, I am not aware of any group of militant gay men who absolutely hate all girls, just for comparison sake.
 
Last edited:
Feb 6, 2007
16,432
1
81
There are 2 distinct groups of lesbos I know of, since my sister is one.

Any time someone simplifies a group as "there are two types of <these people>, X and Y" they just make themselves look like a fool. There are plenty of lesbians who are neither man-hating dykes nor wishy-washy bisexuals. You sound just as ignorant as the OP.
 

SlickSnake

Diamond Member
May 29, 2007
5,235
2
0
Any time someone simplifies a group as "there are two types of <these people>, X and Y" they just make themselves look like a fool. There are plenty of lesbians who are neither man-hating dykes nor wishy-washy bisexuals. You sound just as ignorant as the OP.

No, I'm not a fool, far from it, and I said your mileage may vary. And it makes you look like a fool for trivializing my observations and pigeonholing me into your ignorant X and Y stereotypes.

All I can report on with any veracity is what I have observed myself. Those other lesbos you are referring to also most likely fall into one of those 2 groups, whether you want to admit that, or whether they will admit that to you, is entirely another matter.

And as was pointed out earlier by another poster, women are far less likely to be bound to one sex, I guess it's partly due to the motherly instinct, which seems to be completely eradicated in the militant type dykes.

All women a lesbians. They all have the potential to be lesbian or have a lesbian experience even if not full on lesbian. I asked many women over the years if they would rather see two men get it on or two woman get it on and they have all answered two woman.

When I die I want to come back as a hot lesbian. :)

And I felt I had to add, that in countries with same sex marriages, women have 2 times the divorce rates than men do, and a higher incidence of domestic violence, which also isn't that surprising considering PMS and other emotional disorders in general which they also have higher rates of.

http://www.independent.co.uk/news/u...partnership-as-divorces-up-by-20-8866454.html
 
Last edited:

bradly1101

Diamond Member
May 5, 2013
4,689
294
126
www.bradlygsmith.org
So, some guys from Chicago were in town today. We had lunch and the topic veered into politics. It turns out that our goofy new mayor has a former lesbian as a wife. Now, after undergrad, I returned to NYC and lived in an apartment with a lesbian and two other girls. People can say that lesbians don't like dick but I've seen it first hand that they do. When Time Warner was came out with their phone service, we switched. I helped the cable guy run the lines and under the lesbian's bed were giant dildos with her pubic hair all over them. This, was the evidence I needed as motivation. But, tried as much as I could, I was never able to turn her. Even though I gave up, I was able to tag her "friend" that used to come over often. But hearing that a man was able turn one hurts because I couldn't. Either the mayor's wife was not a real lesbian or he has done something few men can actually lay claim to. I just don't understand how he was able to do it.

Vaginas are made to be pleasured by that shape, so it's used to pleasure another (or her) during love play.

You have about as much chance of turning a lesbian straight as a woman would trying to make me straight. She likes girls probably because she understands and connects with them more than men. I know that's a big part of why I like my guy.
 
Feb 6, 2007
16,432
1
81
No, I'm not a fool, far from it, and I said your mileage may vary. And it makes you look like a fool for trivializing my observations and pigeonholing me into your ignorant X and Y stereotypes.

All I can report on with any veracity is what I have observed myself. Those other lesbos you are referring to also most likely fall into one of those 2 groups, whether you want to admit that, or whether they will admit that to you, is entirely another matter.

I didn't say you were a fool, I said you sounded like a fool because of your ignorance. First off, you continually use the word "lesbo," which is pretty much never used in the lesbian community; it's reserved for frat boys and porn producers. Second, you boil the community down into two stereotypical compartments and ignore every lesbian who doesn't happen to fit that mold. It's fine if that's all you've been exposed to, but that's based on a position of ignorance. You might as well be claiming that all black people are rappers or ballplayers because that's what you've seen portrayed in the media.

As for my experience with the lesbian community, I'm guessing it's slightly more involved than yours, given that I was raised by lesbian mothers, have multiple lesbian family members and was raised largely within a community of lesbians which comprised the bulk of my parents' social group. I can tell you that the vast majority were neither man-hating dykes nor opportunistic bisexuals, though those certainly exist. This notion that everyone from a particular group needs to fall into your narrow-minded stereotype of how people from that group should act is the definition of ignorance. It's your right to be ignorant, but I'm going to call you on your bullshit, and in this particular instance, you have no idea what you're talking about.
 

SlitheryDee

Lifer
Feb 2, 2005
17,252
19
81
Other lesbians? So if you are male, that leaves you up a creek without a paddle then. Unless you are Bruce Jenner in transition.

I think lesbians like women just like I like women. I like lesbians and straight women (provided they meet whatever standards I have at that moment). It just happens that straight women are the ones who are receptive to my advances. They like lesbians and straight women, but it's the lesbians that respond to them. Both of us may try to cut to the chase and only go after the orientation that is likely to return our attention, but that's to save time as much as anything else.
 

Miramonti

Lifer
Aug 26, 2000
28,653
100
106
I think when someone describes a lesbian with the term "lesbianism", it's probably a given that one's level of understanding isn't going to run very deep.
 

JoLLyRoGer

Diamond Member
Aug 24, 2000
4,153
4
81
I think when someone describes a lesbian with the term "lesbianism", it's probably a given that one's level of understanding isn't going to run very deep.

Good point....

"I say for twenty-five dollars we can HEAL this child!. Can I get an AMEN!?"
 

SlickSnake

Diamond Member
May 29, 2007
5,235
2
0
I didn't say you were a fool, I said you sounded like a fool because of your ignorance. First off, you continually use the word "lesbo," which is pretty much never used in the lesbian community; it's reserved for frat boys and porn producers. Second, you boil the community down into two stereotypical compartments and ignore every lesbian who doesn't happen to fit that mold. It's fine if that's all you've been exposed to, but that's based on a position of ignorance. You might as well be claiming that all black people are rappers or ballplayers because that's what you've seen portrayed in the media.

As for my experience with the lesbian community, I'm guessing it's slightly more involved than yours, given that I was raised by lesbian mothers, have multiple lesbian family members and was raised largely within a community of lesbians which comprised the bulk of my parents' social group. I can tell you that the vast majority were neither man-hating dykes nor opportunistic bisexuals, though those certainly exist. This notion that everyone from a particular group needs to fall into your narrow-minded stereotype of how people from that group should act is the definition of ignorance. It's your right to be ignorant, but I'm going to call you on your bullshit, and in this particular instance, you have no idea what you're talking about.

I am sad to say you are certainly emasculated because you have been radically feminized, whether you understand that reality, and how it applies to you, or not.

You may also be straight as an arrow, too. Which just means you will have no problems actually getting along with most women, because you tend to relate to them on an unnatural level, for a typical male.

Suffice it to say, you only know the one side of lesbians that they want to share with you and they want you and the rest of the "straight" world to know about. And because I grew up mostly gay with a crazy *** sister and all her looney lesbo friends, I know much more about the dark sides of those superficially friendly "strictly lesbians" you harp on about.

I may go into more details, later. I already typed something else up, but decided this would suffice, for now.
 
Last edited:

jagec

Lifer
Apr 30, 2004
24,442
6
81
There are 2 distinct groups of lesbos I know of
Okay, now see this? This is a four-way road, okay? And dead in the center, is a crisp, new, hundred dollar bill. Now at the end of each of the streets, are four people, okay? You following? Up here, we got a male-affectionate, easy-to-get-along-with, no political agenda lesbian. Okay? Now down here, we have a man-hating, angry-as-fuck, agenda-of-rage, bitter ***. To this side, we got Santa Claus, right? And over to this side - the Easter Bunny. Which one's going to get to the hundred dollar bill first?
 

BudAshes

Lifer
Jul 20, 2003
13,990
3,346
146
I am sad to say you are certainly emasculated because you have been radically feminized, whether you understand that reality, and how it applies to you, or not.

You may also be straight as an arrow, too. Which just means you will have no problems actually getting along with most women, because you tend to relate to them on an unnatural level, for a typical male.

Suffice it to say, you only know the one side of lesbians that they want to share with you and they want you and the rest of the "straight" world to know about. And because I grew up mostly gay with a crazy *** sister and all her looney lesbo friends, I know much more about the dark sides of those superficially friendly "strictly lesbians" you harp on about.

I may go into more details, later. I already typed something else up, but decided this would suffice, for now.
Please do go into more details, I know I can't wait to hear more of your poignant, yet retarded, rants on lesbians and feminized men.
 

Exophase

Diamond Member
Apr 19, 2012
4,439
9
81
Suffice it to say, you only know the one side of lesbians that they want to share with you and they want you and the rest of the "straight" world to know about. And because I grew up mostly gay with a crazy *** sister and all her looney lesbo friends, I know much more about the dark sides of those superficially friendly "strictly lesbians" you harp on about.

I may go into more details, later. I already typed something else up, but decided this would suffice, for now.

Have you ever considered that your statistical sampling is biased? A group of friends is likely to have a lot of common ground. That's why they're friends. That's why you get cliques. Just because a group of lesbian friends were all a certain way doesn't mean all lesbians are going to be like that.
 

ZaneNBK

Golden Member
Sep 14, 2000
1,674
0
76
Dari, I doubt you lived with lesbians. The mayor's wife explained her "lesbianism". She was young at the time and was trying to fit in somewhere, she felt like she didn't belong anywhere. Perhaps, the gay community gave her comfort. There is also nothing wrong with experimenting with your sexuality to find out who you are.

Also...I find it perplexing that people were obsessing over an article she wrote about lesbianism back in the 80s. What year is it again?

She did really badly with those toys where you have to fit blocks into the properly shaped holes, but after some intensive training she's way better at that.
 

OverVolt

Lifer
Aug 31, 2002
14,278
89
91
Any time someone simplifies a group as "there are two types of <these people>, X and Y" they just make themselves look like a fool. There are plenty of lesbians who are neither man-hating dykes nor wishy-washy bisexuals. You sound just as ignorant as the OP.

Welllll its actually a decent baseline to start seeing where they fit. Change the model as you meet more people but its decent.
 

SlickSnake

Diamond Member
May 29, 2007
5,235
2
0
This quaint little "Lesbian Haunted House of Horrors" looks and sounds like something my loving sister and her wacky girlfriends might have built, if only our government was dumb enough to also fund it.

A bit NSFW from October 30, 2013:

http://www.torontosun.com/2013/10/30/taxpayers-funding-lesbian-haunted-house-in-toronto

A disturbing feature was a &#8220;secret tunnel for women in love&#8221; where video shows a host encouraging visitors to &#8220;crawl on your hands and knees&#8221; and warns &#8220;you will get touched.&#8221;
Is that art?

There was no sign posted indicating the attraction was restricted to adults.


&#8220;It&#8217;s kind of funny that creator Allyson Mitchell will be very discriminating in terms of who she&#8217;ll let into her adorable lesbian feminist haunted house but she sure doesn&#8217;t discriminate when it comes to scarfing down tax dollars,&#8221; commented Menzies, who broke this story.

&#8220;Imagine a man putting up a haunted house with baskets of breasts or severed vaginas? The outcry over the perceived misogyny would be off the charts. But apparently, misandry is not only tolerated but publicly funded.&#8221;

It is outrageous this province has difficultly funding life-saving cancer medication for a woman with a brain tumour but has money to throw around for this.

It is something that should be privately funded and done on a person&#8217;s own property. What should be severed is the public funding.
I'm thinking that a gay male version of this "Haunted House" would likely not go over very well, either in Canada or the USA. And it would probably get people arrested when they got raided and shut down within a few hours after opening it. Especially if they are also groping any males who might enter it, regardless of age. Double standards much?

And I think this extreme anti-male attitude also typifies what a lot of the lesbians, radical or not, often think, in spite of what others may claim who rush to circle the wagons in their defense.

This is from a liberal leaning website about it, and even the admittedly liberal female Wiccan reporter who is married to a husband seems genuinely embarrassed by it, along with her feminist supporting men on the staff there, imagine that. And I support feminism and equal rights for all the gays too, but I do not support man hating radical/militant lesbians with a clear agenda to emasculate (literally and figuratively) men and brainwash other women into their misandrous sister cult.

http://www.addictinginfo.org/2013/11/02/lesbian-haunted-house-man-hating/
 
Last edited:

SlickSnake

Diamond Member
May 29, 2007
5,235
2
0
Please do go into more details, I know I can't wait to hear more of your poignant, yet retarded, rants on lesbians and feminized men.

Yet another poor emasculated eunuch, who just can't come to terms with his loss. Or he's just not noticed he lost it yet.

It's kind of ironic that a gay would have to be the one to tell a straight man he's probably emasculated, but that's a sign of the times of the crazy world we live in now.
 

SlickSnake

Diamond Member
May 29, 2007
5,235
2
0
......and yup slicksnake does his thing.

Honestly, why hasn't this already been moved into Love and Relationships where it belongs? I mean seriously.

This website claims to have the largest user base of misandrous women, over a quarter million users. Which might not sound like many, unless you consider the fact they probably get a lot more than that just lurking around there on a regular basis.

http://www.ihatemen.org/

Obviously, it's a real thing, and I am not just making this all up.
 
Last edited:

mikeymikec

Lifer
May 19, 2011
20,986
16,232
136
Any time someone simplifies a group as "there are two types of <these people>, X and Y" they just make themselves look like a fool. There are plenty of lesbians who are neither man-hating dykes nor wishy-washy bisexuals. You sound just as ignorant as the OP.

Especially since the second group he described weren't lesbians. So to summarise his post, he thinks all lesbians hate men.

I am sad to say you are certainly emasculated because you have been radically feminized, whether you understand that reality, and how it applies to you, or not.

If you were trying to come across as not being ignorant, you failed, resorting to unsubstantiated ad hominem points about Atomic Playboy.

As for "he's only aware of part of the personalities that lesbians have shown him", which seems pretty unlikely because someone who lives with someone for (probably) double-digit years is likely to know them very well because keeping up such a façade is difficult at home for such a length of time.

I was going to then point out that you seem to be a closet homophobe as you talk about "lesbians" showing him that side of their "personality" as if they have some sort of hive mind, but then you pretty much showed that you had left the homophobia closet some time ago in your later posts.

Congratulations. You found some women who hate men. If someone cites a source that shows there are men who hate women, have they proven that all men are like that? Or just the ones who, as part of becoming aware of their non-hetero sexual orientation have taken up the mandatory pledge of allegiance to the relevant organisation that tells them what they have to think?
 
Last edited: