Unarmed black 17 year old shot by Neighborhood watch captain in gated community...

[xj0hnx]

Laying hands on anyone is considered assault. But it's OK in this instance, isn't it? According to you asswipes, the officer had the right to shoot Zimmerman right then and there.

Haha, you're such a weaselish douchebag. Pretending like he was involved in some violent assault against a police officer, then the reality that he just grabbed a plain clothes officers arm in a bar during a minor altercation smacks you in the face and all you have is that laying hands on someone is considered assault? HAHAHA you are the biggest joke running!!! Thanks for the laughs!!!

 

[soundforbjt]

It definitely can get you killed...

Wait what were trayvon's wounds again? He had NO bruises, no defensive wounds whatsoever.

Meanwhile we have zimmerman, back of his head bashed in, fingerprint contusions on his face, busted up nose......


I almost hope this does go to jury, just to show you guys what happens when you decide to act and look like a little thug punk, and attack an innocent man.

What defensive wounds do you think the officer that charged GZ had?

 

[EagleKeeper]

And all of that means jack shit if we have Zimmerman on a recording calling him a fucking punk, and then chasing after him and grabbing him, then losing a fight, then shooting him and killing him out of rage.

Then lying to the police and claiming he was walking back to his car when he was attacked because he had no idea somebody heard him catch up to Trayvon.

Look.. .you keep defending this guy. He's a scum bag. He's a liar. I don't get how you can't see that.

That's why they're making the case about everything but the case. Zimmerman is all they have to prove his case and he's a fucking liar, therefore they have no case. That's why the Zimmerman defense is purely about getting a mis trial or hung jury and not about proving innocence.

and then chasing after him and grabbing him, then losing a fight, then shooting him and killing him out of rage

There is no evidence/facts of such: chasing after him and grabbing him,
There is peoples' opinion only because there is no evidence that he did or did not.


There is no evidence/facts of such: killing him out of rage
There is peoples' opinion only because of words stated previous. The identified words from a witness does not indicate rage.


He does not need to prove his innocence; the state must prove his guilt beyond reasonable doubt
Large difference

 

[TerryMathews]

Who's "we?" White folks? The NRA? The Aryan Brotherhood? Cletus and Virgil back at the compound?

I don't know. You're the one trotting out pronouns. I can only assume you meant white conservatives. You know, the devil.

 

[SpatiallyAware]

Haha, you're such a weaselish douchebag. Pretending like he was involved in some violent assault against a police officer, then the reality that he just grabbed a plain clothes officers arm in a bar during a minor altercation smacks you in the face and all you have is that laying hands on someone is considered assault? HAHAHA you are the biggest joke running!!! Thanks for the laughs!!!

But wait!! Trayvon, the known thief and little thug, caught with stolen jewelry, burglary equipment, who gets congratulated for assaulting bus drivers, who is the school's street-fight referee... is a saint.

 

[EagleKeeper]

Plain clothes or not, his actions warranted his arrest and charge for the crime as the guy he assaulted was an officer.

You're clearly a fucking idiot. Back to my ignore list fuck face.

If a officer is in plain clothes; how is one to know that it is an officer that is being confronted.

Unless the officer identified himself before the confrontation; the assault an officer charge is from the officer POV;

The legal system tossed it out.

People can be arrested for anything the LEO chooses.
IF the prosecution does not follow up and/or the legal system stays your are innocent; the arrest may be on the record; but without a conviction; it is suspect. This was tossed not because of bad paperwork; but it was not justified.

 

[SpatiallyAware]

If a officer is in plain clothes; how is one to know that it is an officer that is being confronted.

Unless the officer identified himself before the confrontation; the assault an officer charge is from the officer POV;

The legal system tossed it out.

People can be arrested for anything the LEO chooses.
IF the prosecution does not follow up and/or the legal system stays your are innocent; the arrest may be on the record; but without a conviction; it is suspect. This was tossed not because of bad paperwork; but it was not justified.

OMG... the logic... it almost hurts. I can hear the little babies whining with their fingers in ears, only hearing what they want.

 

[JKing106]

Haha, you're such a weaselish douchebag. Pretending like he was involved in some violent assault against a police officer, then the reality that he just grabbed a plain clothes officers arm in a bar during a minor altercation smacks you in the face and all you have is that laying hands on someone is considered assault? HAHAHA you are the biggest joke running!!! Thanks for the laughs!!!

You keep demonstrating how utterly stupid, and hypocritical, you truly are. Laying hands on anyone in anger is assault, and usually also battery, in practically all jurisdictions. That's straight from a police officer I've known for 25 years. But here you are defending a clear pattern of a violent behavior in an individual with clear impulse control problems. Assaulting a police officer and resisting arrest with violence, two, count 'em, TWO restraining orders for domestic violence, and bullying/harassing a coworker. Oh, I almost forgot, killing a teenager who pissed him off. But hey, it's OK when Zimmerman does it! He's not a "thug." Because he's not black.

Waiting for your inevitable attempt to "turn the tables on me," making yourself look like the shit-for-brains moron everyone already knows you are. Maybe one of your smarter buddies will come to your rescue. Not that they're much brighter than you. It's not saying much.

 

[JKing106]

I don't know. You're the one trotting out pronouns. I can only assume you meant white conservatives. You know, the devil.

Sure you do, you're just too much of a coward to actually say it.

 

[JKing106]

If a officer is in plain clothes; how is one to know that it is an officer that is being confronted.

Unless the officer identified himself before the confrontation; the assault an officer charge is from the officer POV;

The legal system tossed it out.

People can be arrested for anything the LEO chooses.
IF the prosecution does not follow up and/or the legal system stays your are innocent; the arrest may be on the record; but without a conviction; it is suspect. This was tossed not because of bad paperwork; but it was not justified.

If someone is not a police officer, is it acceptable to assault them? Not where I'm from. Laying hands on anyone in anger is assault. But it's OK in this instance. Zimmerman's not a "thug."

 

[TerryMathews]

Sure you do, you're just too much of a coward to actually say it.

So who were you referring to? Intelligent freedom loving citizens?
YOU said it. You define out.

 

[xj0hnx]

You keep demonstrating how utterly stupid, and hypocritical, you truly are. Laying hands on anyone in anger is assault, and usually also battery, in practically all jurisdictions. That's straight from a police officer I've known for 25 years. But here you are defending a clear pattern of a violent behavior in an individual with clear impulse control problems. Assaulting a police officer and resisting arrest with violence, two, count 'em, TWO restraining orders for domestic violence, and bullying/harassing a coworker. Oh, I almost forgot, killing a teenager who pissed him off. But hey, it's OK when Zimmerman does it! He's not a "thug." Because he's not black.

Waiting for your inevitable attempt to "turn the tables on me," making yourself look like the shit-for-brains moron everyone already knows you are. Maybe one of your smarter buddies will come to your rescue. Not that they're much brighter than you. It's not saying much.

Doubling down on your idiocy? Awesome, keep the laughs coming!!!!

 

[SpatiallyAware]

You keep demonstrating how utterly stupid, and hypocritical, you truly are. Laying hands on anyone in anger is assault, and usually also battery, in practically all jurisdictions. That's straight from a police officer I've known for 25 years. But here you are defending a clear pattern of a violent behavior in an individual with clear impulse control problems. Assaulting a police officer and resisting arrest with violence, two, count 'em, TWO restraining orders for domestic violence, and bullying/harassing a coworker. Oh, I almost forgot, killing a teenager who pissed him off. But hey, it's OK when Zimmerman does it! He's not a "thug." Because he's not black.

Waiting for your inevitable attempt to "turn the tables on me," making yourself look like the shit-for-brains moron everyone already knows you are. Maybe one of your smarter buddies will come to your rescue. Not that they're much brighter than you. It's not saying much.

Clear pattern?? ROFL!! Dude, this stuff all happened over 7 years ago when zimmerman was a young man.

....meanwhile, continue to ignore trayvon's CURRENT and far more serious issues.

Home invasion and burglary is far worse than breaking up a bar fight or tossing a drunk girl in a pool.

 

[SpatiallyAware]

If someone is not a police officer, is it acceptable to assault them? Not where I'm from. Laying hands on anyone in anger is assault. But it's OK in this instance. Zimmerman's not a "thug."

Zimmerman WAS a thug.... over 7 years ago. That's part of why he was able to see trayvon from a mile away, with hoodie in deep cover, peering between houses, etc etc... Same reasons the gas station attendants kept a close eye on him.

 

[JKing106]

Doubling down on your idiocy? Awesome, keep the laughs coming!!!!

HUR HUR! DON'T GOT NOTHIN' TO SAY BUT "COMADY GOLD!" LLLOOLLLOLLL1!!111121~

P.S. Somebody come save me from this ass whipping...

 

[soundforbjt]

Clear pattern?? ROFL!! Dude, this stuff all happened over 7 years ago when zimmerman was a young man.

....meanwhile, continue to ignore trayvon's CURRENT and far more serious issues.

Home invasion and burglary is far worse than breaking up a bar fight or tossing a drunk girl in a pool.

Please post your proof of these claims with conviction records or arrest records. Georgie's is documented facts, yours is pure speculation, without any proof.

I thought you Z-Men claim facts are what's important and to keep emotions & bias out of it.

 

[SpatiallyAware]

Please post your proof of these claims with conviction records or arrest records.

Stop acting ignorant. You know that the crumponite smear campaign made sure the official records were pulled out of the media.

We all saw and read them. Just because it's not missible doesn't magically mean it never happened.

 

[JKing106]

So who were you referring to? Intelligent freedom loving citizens?
YOU said it. You define out.

You're the one who said "we." So, in your mind, all "intelligent freedom loving citizens" are right wing racist cowards who are pleased a Hannity watching, concealed carrying lunatic killed a "thug" for no reason except walking black in the wrong neighborhood? The kind who are too cowardly to say what they really think except when surrounded by like minded morons who shut up real quick when a "thug" walks by because they know they'd get their asses kicked if overheard? The type that's terrified to leave the house without a gun, because the "thugs" might get them?

Sounds about right. You fit right in.

 

[soundforbjt]

Stop acting ignorant. You know that the crumponite smear campaign made sure the official records were pulled out of the media.

We all saw and read them. Just because it's not missible doesn't magically mean it never happened.

Saw and read what official documents or records? What official documents or records were pulled?

 

[JKing106]

Please post your proof of these claims with conviction records or arrest records. Georgie's is documented facts, yours is pure speculation, without any proof.

I thought you Z-Men claim facts are what's important and to keep emotions & bias out of it.

I've got that moron on ignore, but it's funny how Zimmerman "Was a young man, that was 7 years ago!," but the fact that Martin was a young man with an authentic "squeaky clean" record isn't afforded the same consideration. Because he was black. Which automatically makes him a racist, murderer, drug dealer, pimp, and "thug."

 

[WHAMPOM]

Not even getting into how you're wrong in what happened, but this was 7 years ago..

Where's your concern for the homeowners trayvon robbed? The bus driver he assaulted? The families of the people was selling drugs to? ...All of these major issues were within months of his assault on zimmerman.

Police record and actual witness accounts of GZ's history against Zimmerbot fantasy of Black Gang'sta Teen just does not cut it! LOL!!!

George Zimmerman is the one with an actual history of violence and violating the rights of others.

 

[Capt Caveman]

Police record and actual witness accounts of GZ's history against Zimmerbot fantasy of Black Gang'sta Teen just does not cut it! LOL!!!

George Zimmerman is the one with an actual history of violence and violating the rights of others.

Just ignore him, the longer you get him going the more lying and exaggerating he does.

 

[TerryMathews]

You're the one who said "we." So, in your mind, all "intelligent freedom loving citizens" are right wing racist cowards who are pleased a Hannity watching, concealed carrying lunatic killed a "thug" for no reason except walking black in the wrong neighborhood? The kind who are too cowardly to say what they really think except when surrounded by like minded morons who shut up real quick when a "thug" walks by because they know they'd get their asses kicked if overheard? The type that's terrified to leave the house without a gun, because the "thugs" might get them?

Sounds about right. You fit right in.

No reason except assault. It's funny how you always leave that part out

 

[TerryMathews]

I've got that moron on ignore, but it's funny how Zimmerman "Was a young man, that was 7 years ago!," but the fact that Martin was a young man with an authentic "squeaky clean" record isn't afforded the same consideration. Because he was black. Which automatically makes him a racist, murderer, drug dealer, pimp, and "thug."

We have no proof that Martins record is squeaky clean and some reason to believe it's not. The as yet unconfirmed story is that Martin was suspended from school for dealing in marijuana. We know he was suspended for something, and his history was bad enough that mom sent him to dad to get his head on straight.

That doesn't make him a master criminal but it's certainly not squeaky clean if we're being honest with each other.

 

[WHAMPOM]

Stop acting ignorant. You know that the crumponite smear campaign made sure the official records were pulled out of the media.

We all saw and read them. Just because it's not missible doesn't magically mean it never happened.

"yo swung on a bus driver" pulled from an internet account is such a rock solid piece of evidence that T Martin assaulted a bus driver. Got any other "PROOFS" I can make another sarcastic post on?