Originally posted by: Lash444
Originally posted by: Arkitech
Originally posted by: Capt Caveman
Originally posted by: Alistar7
Originally posted by: Capt Caveman
MMA fighter easily. Seals aren't trained as extensively in hand-to-hand combat as a MMA fighter nor do they practice this craft as extensively as a MMA fighter.
:laugh:
Seal kills MMA poser in 60 seconds or less. We will never see this fight, the Seal will just leave the body to be found later......
Some of you kids need to turn off the damn TV.
Or you should realize that a Seal spends a whole lot more time training with weapons and tactics than hand-to-hand combat. I would bet that 1% of them ever use hand-to-hand combat in missions.
You should spend less time watching tv and doing a little research.
Where are you getting these stats from?
Why would the goverment spend all that time and money to train these guys just to see them get whipped in a street fight by some average joe with a couple of martial arts classes in his background.
Lets take the inverse of what he said. You think that Seals spend more time training with hand-to-hand than they do with weapons and tactics? Id also be willing to bet that less than 1% of them use hand-to-hand fighting on missions. When is a Navy Seal going to be 1vs1 with anyone? When aren't they going to have a knife on them? When are they not going to have a partner backing them up?
Are they trained in hand-to-hand combat? Of course. Is a fighter pilot trained in hand-to-hand combat? I'm sure he is. Would I want either of them going hand-to-hand against the enemy? No, not unless something went absolutely and completely wrong. Do you believe that its tactically smart to engage the enemy 1on1 with your fists? Whys it so hard to believe that less than 1% would probably do so then?
Military individuals are trained to use more than their fists. Especially special operations units. They use their mind and body to overpower anyone who poses a threat. Yes, a SEAL is trained predominantly how to overpower using stealth, but stealth can fail and I can bet quite a few have had to kill with their hands to regain the surprise element.
The only thing those with superior training in martial arts have over a SEAL is better defense against body strikes. A SEAL knows many strike points that'll bring a man down, and as soon as a SEAL has a man on the ground, it's game over. He's going to most likely play mind games if he senses a trained opponent.
But all this arguing is pathetic and pointless. We'll never know how it'll end up, there's no benchmark for deciding the true end result, so why argue? This thread will go on for many more pages of repeated points as to why a certain side is better at fights to the death than the other.
Everyone here seems to glamorize fighting, especially a fight to the death, and some seem to idolize martial artists as the be all end all of fighters. Hate to break it to you, but the reason they train in numbers is because they will fail. All fighters, of all training styles, will fail, while others of the same background may reign supreme. How long someone constantly trains is far from a benchmark as to their ability to kill a man, because the only thing that makes killing easier is to have killed before. It provides a level of desensitization. How one reacts to that desensitization is going to be important as well.
Someone who has killed before may go into a fight headstrong. Someone who has not killed before, may go into a fight with a position of strong defense. Or maybe not. Maybe a born fighter, though never having killed a man, may be overly headstrong about his abilities, and a well-trained SEAL may play headgames and fool the opponent in many ways, one way could be to change roles of offensive/defensive strike positions. Let the opponent get cocky, and go for a kill strike or a disablement strike that leads the opponent to the ground.
Martial artists know those strikes, and so does a SEAL. What strikes they know, and what ones they use, is partially determined by their mindset prior to and during a fight. Without having an example to predict or review, it's utterly worthless to state one side or the other is the victor in every match.
With that in mind, I still say the SEAL. Nerves of steel are important, as its ultimately the SEAL's environment: death. How many times he has had to kill before using his hands is not even important. He mindset is that he can and will walk away from the fight, and has no reservations about killing, at least if he is battle-proven. You could have a new recruit SEAL just out of BUD/S, but that's just not as fun in this equation, unless he was Special Forces in the US Army for 15 years prior. Then it could be even better.
+