waggy
No Lifer
- Dec 14, 2000
- 68,143
- 10
- 81
MMA spectators tend to overestimate the advantage of being 'well-rounded.' A phenomenal striker can render other parts of the fight moot.
I also don't think it is a forgone conclusion that McGregor has a weak ground game. He hasn't really been tested on the ground.
MMA fans have always been pretty divided about McGregor, with a vocal contingent calling him GOAT from his first MMA fight and another group saying that he is overrated. Well, as his opponents got tougher and tougher and he continued defeating them in devastating fashion the "overrated" brigade got quieter and quieter.
I think if you look at his resume it is one of the most impressive in the UFC. He has pretty much dominated all opponents, whether they were journeymen or top fighters like Mendes and Aldo. I think people underestimate him because his attitude verus his performance creates a disconnect - people just aren't used to somebody with so much braggadocio being so skilled.
TLDR: Anyone who isn't a McGregor fan is stupid.
except that IF you look at the UFC's top fighters most have a wrestling background. It has been shown a very good wrestler can take down a pure striker at will.
McGregor is a different beast though. he is so fast and accurate he punishes people before they can get a hold of him. Though his only 2 losses have been when it gets to the ground.
It should be a hell of afight. Not sure who is going to win that one. but RDA is a great fighter too.