See, this is a forum that is open for debate on many levels. That includes commenting on the posts of others.
Your lack of a response to me indicates that you based your post on nothing more than pure conjecture and lack of substance.
It's not a lame excuse, if it's real. That's why some of us waited, and waited, and waited for a legitimate presentation of facts (not conjecture). Now that we are on the ground I hope we find something that substantiates our claims . . . and we find it/verify in a manner that doesn't permit charges of deceit.
If they don't find any the next question is what happened to the TONS of nerve agents and thousand of liters of anthrax Saddam admitted having?
conjure, believe what ever you want to believe, I don't really care, there is no since arguing with you
That's because you're shooting with blanks. I have given you several opportunities to answer two simple questions (and to respond to my thoughts on your post).
You're actually worse than Morph, little chirping bird
ok, now look who losing his cool calling people names and personally attacking, just becuase you don't like somebodies comments you attack them, oh well the truth most hurt ya, that's why you can't take it
So if we dont find the tons of chemical and bio weapons Saddam admitted having where did they go?
Uhh...yeah...right. Come on...where are the answers to those two simple questions? I know what they are and you're just afraid to say it for fear of being revealed the hypocrite that you are.
Face it or prove me wrong.
he hide them, destoyed them, sold them, gave them away, who knows maybe he never really had as much as he claimed. we may never really know
Well it's a shame he agreed to declare what he had and destroy them, of course providing the evidence. Sounds like he did everything that he was supposed to except save the one thing that would have freed him from UN oversight and saved his life, the evidence they were destroyed.
We will find out as much as we can, rest assured anything left won't find it's way into terrorists hands.
We will find out as much as we can, rest assured anything left won't find it's way into terrorists hands.
maybe your right Alistar7, but there is one problem, that is that bush wanted him gone no matter what he did. now don't go off the deep end on me for saying that
Originally posted by: HappyGamer2
maybe your right Alistar7, but there is one problem, that is that bush wanted him gone no matter what he did. now don't go off the deep end on me for saying that
Unless you can provide any evidence that suggests had Saddam complied fully we STILL would have went after him that's only an opinion. It still doesn't dismiss the fact that Saddam had plenty of time to comply, it should have taken a few years tops. He would have been left in power, no inspecitons, no restrictions or oversight, with the full purchasing power of the 2nd largest oil reserve at his personal disposal. Great judgement on his part.
Alistar7, I see your point and don't disagree with it, but I think that saddam didn't trust the western world esp bush(s). He just didn't want to give up what he had , maybe scared that he would be to weak against his enemies, home and abroad.
I can say a few things about what happened just before he invaded kuwait, but since I can't prove it I can't say it LOL, these thing would make him not trust us
I can say a few things about what happened just before he invaded kuwait, but since I can't prove it I can't say it LOL, these thing would make him not trust us
That's fine. My point is had he followed certain steps he would have clearly remained in power without restriction. The man is a moron...
He is even now refusing aid from the rest of the Arab world for Iraqi citizens because he feels they did not support him vocally enough..
He is even now refusing aid from the rest of the Arab world for Iraqi citizens because he feels they did not support him vocally enough..
he is boxed in a cornor, and doesn't trust anybody
he doesn't really understand the western world
he doesn't really understand the western world
try to catch Chris Matthew's rerun of Hardball tonight...he has some former Iraqi citizens as guests.
Him and John McCain make fun of the Info Minister also.
Him and John McCain make fun of the Info Minister also.
IIRC, the stuff he had was reportedly destroyed back after the Gulf War. The problem was there was apparently no proof of that destruction. While I don't defend Saddam, it may be the case that it was destroyed, just not properly documented. If this is the case, we may look a little foolish after this is all over.
One more thing to think about. It is possible that there is still chemical and biological weapons hidden in Iraq that will not be found for awhile, but what about those supposed mobile labs in the backs of tractor trailer trucks that he had. I would think those would be almost impossible to hide, and would be found fairly quickly. Could it be that he never had these mobile labs?
I just checked - They're re-running it on PMSNBC at 4:00 AM ET. I think I might actually have to turn off Al Jazee...I mean, Fox news....erm.....
DEATH TO THE INFIDEL!
TRENDING THREADS
-
Discussion Zen 5 Speculation (EPYC Turin and Strix Point/Granite Ridge - Ryzen 9000)- Started by DisEnchantment
- Replies: 25K
-
Discussion Intel Meteor, Arrow, Lunar & Panther Lakes + WCL Discussion Threads
- Started by Tigerick
- Replies: 22K
-
News NVIDIA and Intel to Develop AI Infrastructure and Personal Computing Products- Started by poke01
- Replies: 384
-
Discussion Intel current and future Lakes & Rapids thread- Started by TheF34RChannel
- Replies: 23K
Facebook
Twitter