TX Judge Breaks Up Lesbian Home

[zsdersw]

If your sexual preference is contrary to state law, then no, it is not a "personal matter."

There is no state law against a particular "sexual preference".

 

[fskimospy]

In what way is their lifestyle not immoral?

It goes both ways.

No, it sure doesn't. You are making a positive statement that their lifestyle is immoral. It is incumbent upon you to explain how.

 

[nextJin]

Yours are worth less.

Not really.

When I make a topic it's usually on varying subjects. I don't wake up with the intent to push the gay people agenda on every single post relevant or not.

 

[surfsatwerk]

Not really.

When I make a topic it's usually on varying subjects. I don't wake up with the intent to push the gay people agenda on every single post relevant or not.

Explain? Are they trying to legislate access to my sweet sweet tush?

 

[Texashiker]

There is no state law against a particular "sexual preference".

Chester the Molester, his sexual preference is preteen girls. I guess that is none of the states business because it is personal.

No, it sure doesn't. You are making a positive statement that their lifestyle is immoral. It is incumbent upon you to explain how.

Negative, I do not have to explain anything.

Those wishing to have a gay relationships need to explain why their choices should be tolerated.

The court of public opinion has said gay relationships are immoral.

 

[thraashman]

In what way is their lifestyle not immoral?

It goes both ways.




We have morals and values, and that makes us a backwards state?

No, it really doesn't go both ways. Their lifestyle is only as immoral as every straight couple's lifestyle, including married ones since in Texas these two can't get married.

 

[nehalem256]

Yes, which is why I say there's no reason to say what's more likely.

So to me like you just undermined you reason for starting this thread huh?

And especially posts like this:

Such clauses are also rarely enforced... making the enforcement of this particular one, which happens to involve a lesbian couple, highly suspicious that it isn't, as you claim, about gay people.

And of course what seems more likely:

(1) After years of his wife being in a lesbian relationship he suddenly decides to invoke the morality clause

(2) Shortly after a custody dispute begins he decides to invoke the morality clause (whether because he is a crazy psycho stalker or to gain leverage to see his children more)

 

[Texashiker]

No, it really doesn't go both ways. Their lifestyle is only as immoral as every straight couple's lifestyle, including married ones since in Texas these two can't get married.

The court of public opinion has said gay relationships are immoral.

I, as an individual, say that I should not be forced to respect someone for their decision to live an alternative and immoral lifestyle.

 

[nextJin]

Explain? Are they trying to legislate access to my sweet sweet tush?

Search for posts by the OP, everything he does revolves around gays.

Gay woman shot in the street? Post
Bi robbed at gun point? Post
Private company ban gay membership? Post

Thread on tax law? Gays are important
Thread on Biceps? Gays are important
Thread on Alien Abduction? Gays.

etc.

 

[nehalem256]

Tell me about your long thought out decision whether to be straight or gay growing up. Be sure to tell us about your sex with a man to make sure you were making the right decision...

Actually you have a bit of problem with your argument. I mean this case really would seem to demonstrate that being homosexual is a choice.

I mean the lesbian in question married and had 1+ children in a heterosexual relationship...

 

[zsdersw]

Chester the Molester, his sexual preference is preteen girls. I guess that is none of the states business because it is personal.

That's entirely different, and you know it... but are being an ass because it suits you.

Those wishing to have a gay relationships need to explain why their choices should be tolerated.

No they don't need to explain anything to the public or to government, at any level.

The court of public opinion has said gay relationships are immoral.

Wrong. This isn't 1950.

 

[surfsatwerk]

Search for posts by the OP, everything he does revolves around gays.

Gay woman shot in the street? Post
Bi robbed at gun point? Post
Private company ban gay membership? Post

Thread on tax law? Gays are important
Thread on Biceps? Gays are important
Thread on Alien Abduction? Gays.

etc.

So the OP has a desire to discuss gay issues? I don't see how any of it as a threat to my virgin tushy. When you mentioned the "gay agenda" I was concerned something much more ominous was in play.

 

[Texashiker]

Tell me about your long thought out decision whether to be straight or gay growing up. Be sure to tell us about your sex with a man to make sure you were making the right decision...

I put off answering your questions so that I could put some thought into it.

There are several reasons why I am not gay.

1, it hurts enough squeezing a turd out, much less having something rammed in there. I do not like the idea of having my butt tore open, so no thank you.

A few weeks ago my wife and I ran into a gay guy while we were grocery shopping. The guy was in a wheel chair, so we asked if he was ok. He said he had to have emergency surgery for ruptured hemorrhoids. I thought to myself "if you would stop putting stuff in there you may not have that problem."

2, I wanted a family. It only makes sense to get married (to a woma)n and have children naturally. It sure beats trying to adopt and stealing children from people who have a medical problem and can not have children naturally.

 

[zsdersw]

So to me like you just undermined you reason for starting this thread huh?

Nope. I still maintain that the judge's decision is stupid and should be overturned.

And of course what seems more likely:

(1) After years of his wife being in a lesbian relationship he suddenly decides to invoke the morality clause

(2) Shortly after a custody dispute begins he decides to invoke the morality clause (whether because he is a crazy psycho stalker or to gain leverage to see his children more)

The custody dispute may be because or fueled by her being a lesbian. We don't know if it does, but it's as likely as any other explanation.

 

[mammador]

shame, but it's texas so what ya gonna do loll..

i don't hate anybody really.

 

[zsdersw]

Search for posts by the OP, everything he does revolves around gays.

Gay woman shot in the street? Post
Bi robbed at gun point? Post
Private company ban gay membership? Post

Thread on tax law? Gays are important
Thread on Biceps? Gays are important
Thread on Alien Abduction? Gays.

etc.

If you choose to increase your post count by whining about my posts, go ahead. I'll warm up the bottle of baby formula for you.

 

[nextJin]

it hurts enough squeezing a turd out, much less having something rammed in there. I do not like the idea of having my butt tore open, so no thank you.

lmao

 

[SagaLore]

That has yet to be proven.

Show me the gene for gayness, and I will retract my statements and post an apology.

I think we just found the genes for assholeness.

 

[nextJin]

If you choose to increase your post count by whining about my posts, go ahead. I'll warm up the bottle of baby formula for you.

No need, I had sex and kids. Got plenty in the cabinets.

 

[zsdersw]

No need, I had sex and kids. Got plenty in the cabinets.

Then you should warm some up for yourself.

 

[Texashiker]

I think we just found the genes for assholeness.

I offered to retract my statement and post an apology. And somehow that is being an asshole?

 

[TerryMathews]

Yeah, sure it doesn't. We don't know if the 'morality clause' was inserted in the divorce papers by the ex-spouse because he's a stalker or if he has a problem with his former wife divorcing him so she could be in a relationship with a woman. In either case, the judge shouldn't have ruled how he did.

You're materially misrepresenting what I said. The husband is pursuing this because they're gay, without a doubt.

The court is ruling based on the divorce decree THAT SHE AGREED TO. Not because she's gay.

 

[nextJin]

Then you should warm some up for yourself.

That would be cost prohibitable, formula is for newborns and expensive. You know those things that pop out after 9 months after a man and woman have sex?

 

[zsdersw]

A few weeks ago my wife and I ran into a gay guy while we were grocery shopping. The guy was in a wheel chair, so we asked if he was ok. He said he had to have emergency surgery for ruptured hemorrhoids. I thought to myself "if you would stop putting stuff in there you may not have that problem."

If you were at all a person who thinks critically about things, you'd realize that hemorrhoids are not caused by pleasurable anal sex.

Then again, you're clearly not a critically-thinking person.. so to you anal sex between two guys is "eww!" so you close your ears and say "la la la la", perpetuating your ignorance.

 

[brycejones]

Chester the Molester, his sexual preference is preteen girls. I guess that is none of the states business because it is personal.

Why is this the first place so many "moral" people go when homosexuality is brought up? For people concerned about morals you all sure spend lots of time thinking about child molestation.