• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

TX AG Openly Admits Voter Suppression

Page 2 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.
If you can't get your pathetic arse to a voting station, then YES YOU SHOULD NOT COUNT. If you have such a life, where you can't do that, or out of country, then yes, you count less if at all compared to those who bothered to do it.
 
^ There is nothing at all wrong with tighening up the election process so there is less fraud. That is the right thing to do, no monkey business. How can you be against fair elections?

It has nothing to do with Trump, or either party! We should ignore his agenda alleging he shouldn't have lost the election and move on to make voting more secure in the future.
 
mindless1 said:
^ There is nothing at all wrong with tighening up the election process so there is less fraud. That is the right thing to do, no monkey business. How can you be against fair elections?

It has nothing to do with Trump. We should ignore his agenda alleging he shouldn't have lost the election and move on to make voting more secure in the future.
Click to expand...
The partisan audits are all about Trump.

The widespread voter fraud claim is all about Trump.

The stolen election claim is all about Trump.

Elections boards across the country have already stated this was the most secure election in history.

It's all about bowing to Trump and stopping those damned minorities.
 
Fenixgoon said:
and in doing so, you'd be disenfranchising a hell of a lot of people in the process. which means you need a good reason to limit people's right to vote. which means documented widespread voter fraud.

keep up.
Click to expand...
Not at all. I limit nobody. Get ur arse to a voting station and vote. If you can't bother, then yes, you shouldn't count.
 
HomerJS said:
The partisan audits are all about Trump.

The widespread voter fraud claim is all about Trump.

The stolen election claim is all about Trump.

Elections boards across the country have already stated this was the most secure election in history.

It's all about bowing to Trump and stopping those damned minorities.
Click to expand...
Let's be clear. Trump lost, what is done is done. This is not about trying to reverse an election, rather it is about the future of secure elections.
 
I can recognize that this topic will go on and on and on and on, and those with TDS will keep thinking I somehow want the election changed, when that's not at all the case, so I unsubscribe and am happy to let you discuss without my further input.
 
mindless1 said:
I can recognize that this topic will go on and on and on and on, and those with TDS will keep thinking I somehow want the election changed, when that's not at all the case, so I unsubscribe and am happy to let you discuss without my further input.
Click to expand...

Spoken like a true sufferer of TDS
 
mindless1 said:
Not at all. I limit nobody. Get ur arse to a voting station and vote. If you can't bother, then yes, you shouldn't count.
Click to expand...
Ahhh...so you:
1) Must be able bodied
AND
2) Have the means to get yourself to a voting station
AND
3) have the availability and capacity to stand in line for up to several hours
AND
4) Do it on the specific day between the specific hours
AND
5) Have a job where you are able to take the time off without financial impact
AND...

So if you are proposing expanding the voting to last several days and make it a national paid holiday and ensure that voting locations are abundant and lines are short, we can talk about additional ways to make voting even more secure despite no evidence of voter fraud ever having occurred in any appreciable amount or affecting an election.

While we are at it, let's go ahead and let the federal government dictate precisely how elections occur that affect the federal government. No more of this bullshit where states get to decide how federal elections are held. Texas elections, for instance, affect me directly at the national level yet I don't live in Texas.

If you can't agree with those types of changes, you are simply a moronic, partisan shill.
 
mindless1 said:
I can recognize that this topic will go on and on and on and on, and those with TDS will keep thinking I somehow want the election changed, when that's not at all the case, so I unsubscribe and am happy to let you discuss without my further input.
Click to expand...
I specifically address you, you ignored it.

Also: there is no widespread voter fraud. Try to keep up.
 
compcons said:
Ahhh...so you:
1) Must be able bodied
AND
2) Have the means to get yourself to a voting station
AND
3) have the availability and capacity to stand in line for up to several hours
AND
4) Do it on the specific day between the specific hours
AND
5) Have a job where you are able to take the time off without financial impact
AND...

So if you are proposing expanding the voting to last several days and make it a national paid holiday and ensure that voting locations are abundant and lines are short, we can talk about additional ways to make voting even more secure despite no evidence of voter fraud ever having occurred in any appreciable amount or affecting an election.

While we are at it, let's go ahead and let the federal government dictate precisely how elections occur that affect the federal government. No more of this bullshit where states get to decide how federal elections are held. Texas elections, for instance, affect me directly at the national level yet I don't live in Texas.

If you can't agree with those types of changes, you are simply a moronic, partisan shill.
Click to expand...
It's impossible with these people.
 
mindless1 said:
If you can't get your pathetic arse to a voting station, then YES YOU SHOULD NOT COUNT. If you have such a life, where you can't do that, or out of country, then yes, you count less if at all compared to those who bothered to do it.
Click to expand...

so someone who works two jobs, 80 hours a week who can't get to a "voting station" within the set timeframe (which has been shrunk by Republicans at every opportunity), their vote shouldn't count? how about an elderly person or disabled person, and during a pandemic none the less.

mindless indeed and back to the ignore list.
 
My state has had universal vote by mail since 1998 and zero voter fraud. This lie about vote by mail and voter fraud is just that.. a lie.
This whole agenda is about limiting voting access in certain areas that might vote unfavorably for the entrenched political establishment. To make sure that R-leaning precincts have easy access to voting, with many polling stations nearby with no lines, while D-leaning precincts have few polling stations with lines so long that you'll have to wait all day to vote. And that's something they can't accomplish if everyone could just vote by mail. And the trolls here falsely crying fraud know this all too well.
 
mindless1 said:
I think it's really simple. If you can't vote the conventional way, can't drag yer arse to a station to do it, your vote shouldn't count, if you are out of country or xyz excuse why you can't do this normal thing, then you are also, not a relevant citizen where the result impacts you as much. How about counting these alternate BS voting methods as 1/4th a normal vote.

No. Even 1/4th is too much. If you can't perform your duty as a citizen, you shouldn't have any say in the outcome. Excuses, excuses, mean it didn't matter much to you. If you can't bother, you don't count.

With that in mind, I am not suggesting Biden shouldn't have won the election. Am not in that party, just think we need to get rid of some potential ways that voting can be corrupt.
Click to expand...
So the disabled, elderly, hospitalized, people who work and can’t afford or are unable to take time off to vote etc... are not relevant citizens if they can’t go stand in a line for what in some places is 8 hours or more to vote? Those out of the country temporarily for work, school, serving humanitarian missions are not relevant citizens? Those on government assignment all over the world be it military, diplomatic or any other reason are not relevant citizens?

You do live up to your name.
 
It's funny how the Trump admin was actively looking for cases of voter fraud, alleged voter fraud in the 2020 result too, then Trump finally left office, and a few months after that, this guy is casually talking about up to 2.5 million cases of voter fraud that he's done nothing to investigate? The freaking holy grail for the Republicans?

Yet to s0me here, that's the more believable scenario than the GOP being full of shit with regard to widespread voter fraud?
 
mikeymikec said:
It's funny how the Trump admin was actively looking for cases of voter fraud, alleged voter fraud in the 2020 result too, then Trump finally left office, and a few months after that, this guy is casually talking about up to 2.5 million cases of voter fraud that he's done nothing to investigate? The freaking holy grail for the Republicans?

Yet to s0me here, that's the more believable scenario than the GOP being full of shit with regard to widespread voter fraud?
Click to expand...

It's pretty clear the GOP is full of shit on a number of topics. They just don't care to change. Regressive to the core.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

TRENDING THREADS

Back
Top