Trump White House/Cabinet appointments

Page 6 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.

K1052

Elite Member
Aug 21, 2003
53,728
48,385
136
Need it be said again that his almost sole requirement for his first choice picks has been, above all else, loyalty. Not competence, intelligence, experience, or qualification. Rewards for the bootlickers who ate their conscience...if they actually had them to begin with. If you were willing to totally debase yourself intellectually and morally on live TV to defend the indefensible you're pretty much in.
 
Jul 9, 2009
10,759
2,086
136
Need it be said again that his almost sole requirement for his first choice picks has been, above all else, loyalty. Not competence, intelligence, experience, or qualification. Rewards for the bootlickers who ate their conscience...if they actually had them to begin with. If you were willing to totally debase yourself intellectually and morally on live TV to defend the indefensible you're pretty much in.
Sorry, but some of President-elect Trump's picks were critical of him during the election and weren't numbered among his supporters.
 

K1052

Elite Member
Aug 21, 2003
53,728
48,385
136
Sorry, but some of President-elect Trump's picks were critical of him during the election and weren't numbered among his supporters.

If appointing Nikki Haley to a post he would just as soon get rid of qualifies as reaching out color me unimpressed.
 

Jhhnn

IN MEMORIAM
Nov 11, 1999
62,365
14,686
136
Need it be said again that his almost sole requirement for his first choice picks has been, above all else, loyalty. Not competence, intelligence, experience, or qualification. Rewards for the bootlickers who ate their conscience...if they actually had them to begin with. If you were willing to totally debase yourself intellectually and morally on live TV to defend the indefensible you're pretty much in.

Christie is an interesting counterpoint to that. When it came down to friends vs family, family won. Kushner hates Christie because Christie put his father briefly in prison rather than letting him off entirely. Christie would have discredited himself bigly at the time had he done anything less.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Charles_Kushner

Here's another interesting influence on the family-

http://www.nytimes.com/2016/06/21/us/politics/donald-trump-roy-cohn.html?_r=0

It's remarkable how a clan of crooks, liars & charlatans have been chosen to "clean up Washington".
 

Sunburn74

Diamond Member
Oct 5, 2009
5,076
2,635
136
Need it be said again that his almost sole requirement for his first choice picks has been, above all else, loyalty. Not competence, intelligence, experience, or qualification. Rewards for the bootlickers who ate their conscience...if they actually had them to begin with. If you were willing to totally debase yourself intellectually and morally on live TV to defend the indefensible you're pretty much in.

This seems to be the case for sure. High level cronyism.

Wouldn't be surprised if he made Dana White head of the VA Healthcare system as part of a campaign to give vets kick ass health care.

Can you say Scott Baio for IRS director or something and the Duck Hunt guy as Ambassador to italy? Wouldnt be surprised at all.
 

boomerang

Lifer
Jun 19, 2000
18,883
641
126
Who would the losing team like to see as cabinet appointments for a Republican president? We'd all love to hear them.
 

K1052

Elite Member
Aug 21, 2003
53,728
48,385
136
Christie is an interesting counterpoint to that. When it came down to friends vs family, family won. Kushner hates Christie because Christie put his father briefly in prison rather than letting him off entirely. Christie would have discredited himself bigly at the time had he done anything less.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Charles_Kushner

Here's another interesting influence on the family-

http://www.nytimes.com/2016/06/21/us/politics/donald-trump-roy-cohn.html?_r=0

It's remarkable how a clan of crooks, liars & charlatans have been chosen to "clean up Washington".

By all accounts the family never liked or trusted Christie, even if Trump did enjoy the near total subservience of him playing the Salacious Crumb role. He flipped way too fast and his own increasing political liabilities were likely to weigh down Trump. I'm sure Kushner took no small pleasure throwing him under the bus for the VP slot and later off the transition planning.
 
Jul 9, 2009
10,759
2,086
136
If appointing Nikki Haley to a post he would just as soon get rid of qualifies as reaching out color me unimpressed.
Also his pick for Education, but color me unsurprised you are wrong and don't give a rats ass.
"
DID NOT SUPPORT TRUMP

DeVos did not support Trump’s candidacy, telling the Washington Examiner in March that he “does not represent the Republican Party.” Her family foundation has donated between $10,000-$25,000 to the Clinton Foundation, according to an analysis by The Washington Post."
 

K1052

Elite Member
Aug 21, 2003
53,728
48,385
136
Also his pick for Education, but color me unsurprised you are wrong and don't give a rats ass.
"
DID NOT SUPPORT TRUMP

DeVos did not support Trump’s candidacy, telling the Washington Examiner in March that he “does not represent the Republican Party.” Her family foundation has donated between $10,000-$25,000 to the Clinton Foundation, according to an analysis by The Washington Post."

Your apparent reading comprehension problem is most concerning. I said "first choice picks" which in the case of Sec of Ed was Jerry Falwell Jr.
 

Thump553

Lifer
Jun 2, 2000
12,839
2,625
136

Just when I thought there couldn't be a worse choice than DeVos (never taught, no educational degrees, never attended one day of public school in her life and nor did her children) Trump proves me wrong.

I thought his claim to fame was he was going to pick Class A leaders who were heads and shoulders above the usual Washingtonians.
 

trenchfoot

Lifer
Aug 5, 2000
16,100
8,689
136
Just when I thought there couldn't be a worse choice than DeVos (never taught, no educational degrees, never attended one day of public school in her life and nor did her children) Trump proves me wrong.

I thought his claim to fame was he was going to pick Class A leaders who were heads and shoulders above the usual Washingtonians.

Looks like he's going to pick one or maybe even a few people with legit pedigrees in order to cast their aura of prestige and qualifications over those posers who Trump simply wants to reward for their loyalty. Remember Bush 43 appointee Mike "Heck of a Job" Brown? Well, it seems Trump is on a mission to outdo Bush in a really bigly kind of way. ;)
 

nageov3t

Lifer
Feb 18, 2004
42,808
83
91
the drama over Romney is interesting... seems like the Trump insiders are pushing for Rudy, but honestly I don't see how he survives a confirmation hearing even with a Republican-controlled Senate given the fact that he's taken money personally (ie: not just through a charity) from foreign governments like Qatar, Venezuela, and Iranian dissidents (MEK, considered to be a terrorist organization right up until 2012).

Trump 'furious' over Conway comments about Romney: report

 

Balt

Lifer
Mar 12, 2000
12,673
482
126
I guess Petraeus is the latest favorite for Sec of State, according to the media anyway.

Petraeus is smart, though having an affair and sharing classified information with that reporter was pretty freaking stupid. I guess after screaming about Hillary's email server for the past year, Republicans are probably just going to give a pass to Petraeus.

Let's face it, though, it could be worse. At least Petraeus has foreign affairs experience.
 

K1052

Elite Member
Aug 21, 2003
53,728
48,385
136
I almost want him to blow a crapload of political capital in the nearly futile effort of trying to make Rudy SecState.
 
Jul 9, 2009
10,759
2,086
136
I guess Petraeus is the latest favorite for Sec of State, according to the media anyway.

Petraeus is smart, though having an affair and sharing classified information with that reporter was pretty freaking stupid. I guess after screaming about Hillary's email server for the past year, Republicans are probably just going to give a pass to Petraeus.

Let's face it, though, it could be worse. At least Petraeus has foreign affairs experience.
How about Cheney for Sec. of State?
 

fskimospy

Elite Member
Mar 10, 2006
88,238
55,791
136
I guess Petraeus is the latest favorite for Sec of State, according to the media anyway.

Petraeus is smart, though having an affair and sharing classified information with that reporter was pretty freaking stupid. I guess after screaming about Hillary's email server for the past year, Republicans are probably just going to give a pass to Petraeus.

Let's face it, though, it could be worse. At least Petraeus has foreign affairs experience.

Petraeus would be a fine choice for two reasons:

1. He appears to be competent and sane, both of which are in short supply in the Trump administration so far.
2. Would expose the comical hypocrisy of Republicans complaining about Clinton's email server.
 

Balt

Lifer
Mar 12, 2000
12,673
482
126
Petraeus would be a fine choice for two reasons:

1. He appears to be competent and sane, both of which are in short supply in the Trump administration so far.
2. Would expose the comical hypocrisy of Republicans complaining about Clinton's email server.

Be careful. If word gets out that Trump is considering someone sane and competent for one of the most important positions in the country, his supporters are going to throw a fucking fit.
 

Jhhnn

IN MEMORIAM
Nov 11, 1999
62,365
14,686
136
Petraeus would be a fine choice for two reasons:

1. He appears to be competent and sane, both of which are in short supply in the Trump administration so far.
2. Would expose the comical hypocrisy of Republicans complaining about Clinton's email server.

2. Trump voters are so enthralled that they won't even notice.

It's amazing to think how far we've come that Libs would probably be relieved if Trump nominated Petraeus for SoS.
 

Thump553

Lifer
Jun 2, 2000
12,839
2,625
136
Petraeus would be an interesting choice. Not only has he plead guilty to improperly sharing classified information with his mistress (something far worse than Hillary was ever even accused of and a lesser crime he plead to avoid felony jail time) but he is also CURRENTLY on probation. A cabinet member serving while on probation-I certainly hope that's a first.

Hopefully Trump will schedule the cabinet meetings around when Petraeus has to report to his probation officer.

Sadly even with such considerable baggage he is heads and shoulders above nearly all of the rest of Trump's cabinet nominations.
 

ivwshane

Lifer
May 15, 2000
33,731
17,379
136
Its funny how trump said Hillary wasn't qualified because of how she handled classified information only to possibly appoint someone who has been charged with mishandling of classified info.

The guy is as self aware as his supporters, that is, not at all.
 
Last edited: