WelshBloke
Lifer
- Jan 12, 2005
- 33,578
- 11,717
- 136
Nobody does any more man… nobody…. F you Poe!excellent. I actually kidn of thought that because your opener was verbatim what he said, and that was the first time in my life I had heard such a thing.
Guessing you don't really have the reputation around here to go with a post without the /s
Ok then I rescind my previous comment and applaud the lurking hustle. My sarcasm radar no longer functions after the last... Many years of batshit insanity.Does no one remember pcgeek saying with all sincerity that women ruined sub culture? I was doing a sarcastic riff off of that. I thought the insanity of it would make the sarcasm obvious, my apologies.
Some of us are a bit touchy after years of insanity. Nice play, though.Does no one remember pcgeek saying with all sincerity that women ruined sub culture? I was doing a sarcastic riff off of that. I thought the insanity of it would make the sarcasm obvious, my apologies.
If it makes you feel better, I got what you were doing.Does no one remember pcgeek saying with all sincerity that women ruined sub culture? I was doing a sarcastic riff off of that. I thought the insanity of it would make the sarcasm obvious, my apologies.
Nobody does any more man… nobody…. F you Poe!
View attachment 87752
Don's had quite the day, the help will be cleaning ketchup of the walls for hours
Does no one remember pcgeek saying with all sincerity that women ruined sub culture? I was doing a sarcastic riff off of that. I thought the insanity of it would make the sarcasm obvious, my apologies.
She also made a highly questionable ruling in Trump's favor today, also as expected. Smith is sure to appeal - I wonder if he will try to get her removed now.And Judge Cannon appears to be delaying the case even further. As expected.
Doubt this is enough to force her to be removed.
Oh it has nothing to do with setting trial dates, it has to do with her apparently misapplying statutes about discovery related to classified materials.Correct, it's not. Judges are given wide discretion on setting trial dates. In this case, her rationale is that the DC insurrection case is currently set for March 6, which is a conflict. They're not going to remove her for moving the trial for pretty much any reason, let alone when she has that reason for doing it.
The flip side, of course, is that the judge in the DC case is less inclined to help Trump, and now the time conflict has been removed because the Florida case will be moved. So Trump- may go to trial on the insurrection case in March.
Oh it has nothing to do with setting trial dates, it has to do with her apparently misapplying statutes about discovery related to classified materials.
Link to today’s ruling here.What specific ruling is that tweet discussing? Can't find anything in the news, except that last month Cannon ruled that any classified docs provided can only be reviewed and discussed at a secure facility. Trump attorney's had asked that they and their client be allowed to review and discuss them at Mara-Lago.
![]()
Judge in documents case lays out rules for Trump's access to classified information in lead-up to trial
The 16-page protective order laid out procedures Trump and his lawyers must follow when handling classified information disclosed to them in connection with the case.www.cbsnews.com
Link to today’s ruling here.
Of course I’m no lawyer so I’m relying on this guy’s interpretation of it but if what he is saying is accurate that’s bonkers.
She starts every ruling with the presumption the federal prosecutors who actually have experience with these cases are lying and wrong about everything, and team Trump (which has never seen a confidential information case before nor a fact it wouldn't lie about) is the one and only source of gospel truth. If you accept those as starting assumptions, the logic of her rulings is impeccable and completely predictable.She's out of her league and apparently not willing to ask other more experienced judges for their opinions/advice.
Maybe check that guy that doesn't have a bank account but is somehow the third in line for the presidency...I'd be curious to know if anyone is looking into any potential money trail.
Yes he’s an idiot but really don’t think he’s that stupid to bribe a judge with a cheque signed in sharpie
She already has her payment as a lifetime appointment days after Trump lost the election.I'd be curious to know if anyone is looking into any potential money trail.
Oh, the irony.Hehe potential witness may be a Mar A Lago plumber
