This linked story in today's New York Times has a comments section, which is not yet "closed." I read several of the "Readers Picks" and
this one is an absolute standout. 😳😵😡
Jack Bush
Asheville
3h ago
A couple of times I’ve worked in WH jobs that required a security clearance. Jobs that required me to occasionally review secret and, narrowly defined, top secret documents. Every time I had to review these types of documents, it was in a secure room. A “SKIF”, a Sensitive Compartmented Information Facility. When I was in the SCIF reviewing documents, I was being filmed and monitored. Before I entered I had to leave my cell phone and was scanned for other items. If I made notes, I had to leave them in a burn bag or submit them for review. No confidential or secret information could leave the SCIF except in my brain. I was scanned again when leaving the SCIF. I directly observed secret documents being brought to the President. They were carefully monitored and they were always returned. My point is, for Trump to take classified documents, to have them in his control over some time, to then be able to remove them from the WH, he must have had willing collaborators. Collaborators who helped him evade the very well established security procedures in the White House and the Executive Office Building. It’s impossible to just walk out with secret documents. They’re tracked meticulously. It’s known immediately if they’re missing. Trump could not have pulled this off on his own. Logs had to have been doctored and other sophisticated evasive measure taken. There also had to be a purpose that made the risks worthwhile. Monetization of our secrets is the only thing that makes sense.