Yes, but you can't blame people for what they do while asleep.so, like I said?
Yes, but you can't blame people for what they do while asleep.so, like I said?
I'm sure they'll be just as peaceful and law abiding as the Jan6
Sounds like he’s already blowing the whistle...
"These are dark times for our Nation, as my beautiful home, Mar-A-Lago in Palm Beach, Florida, is currently under siege, raided, and occupied by a large group of FBI agents."
That language seems to describe the work of enemy combatants.
I’m glad I’m not the only one who thinks like that. Maybe I can stop worrying I’ll be the only one in the asylum.There is also the possibility Trump wanted to be raided.
He lets a birdie know he had some classified documents(something maybe not significant that would blow over), the FBI raids, Trump uses this opportunity to spin and launch his campaign.
I’m going to go out on a limb here and say a federal criminal indictment is probably not good for a campaign.I’m glad I’m not the only one who thinks like that. Maybe I can stop worrying I’ll be the only one in the asylum.
There is no way the FBI would raid Trump’s house unless there was a very high probability of an indictment.
yeah but this current SCOTUS already doesn't care about actual constitutional precedent so...eh, ....oh.
yeah. fucking ghouls, all the way down!
I'm still rolling heavy on the need for some serious Mitch/Lindsey/Tucker/Mercer/Koch Kompromat that will turn up in little Trump's safe, or whatever the fuck is going on.
It's really the only way at this point. No turning back if you ask me, fellow humans: Johnny Red gonna start shooting in probably 5 days if this isn't figured out, and quick.
So what is this all going to amount to? Some documentation mishandling? Are the optics worth whatever political/social/violent fallout that comes from it?
Or is the whole "raid" thing overblown and the FBI was simply retrieving over due books and that's all that will ever come of it? The whole thing seems weird.
Of course you will, because it's all just so questionable. It isn't like he was storing emails on a private server, amirite?I'll wait and see.
Too bad so many people insist on being unreasonable.I don't think any reasonable person doubts he broke the law for a second.
He still refuses to see it; in full denial mode to this day.Trump doesn’t even meet the minimum requirement of being a decent human being. You either couldn’t see it or refused to see it
I guess it depends on what someone means by very high but I think over 80%.I'm not sure if I'd say "very high," as it's good to be cautious, but it's certainly a lot higher than zero.
From the federal prosecutors and defense attorneys I am reading they say it is unlikely the FBI would have raided Trump’s house over document retention laws. It is highly likely to be related to more significant crimes.What I find most interesting in this whole saga is speculating on what records Trump kept. The #1 and #2 threads on this board right now are Trump being raided for retaining records and Trump frantically flushing records down the toilet. Trump has consistently shown to be someone who does not keep records, and operates more like a mafia don in suggesting others to do his bidding rather than creating an organized conspiracy. This leads me to believe that he would only retain (rather than destroy) certain things. Most likely, I think they would be things of ongoing value. If he merely didn't want others to see them, he would destroy them. So my mind goes to documents which could be used for leverage/blackmail against others. The other possibility, which I find less likely in observing Trump's character but still possible, would be things that are valuable in the form of trophies.
Otherwise, the sickening thing here is the number of sycophants who have jumped to further degrade our institutions in admonishing the FBI. This is a given for the likes of MTG, but not for those whose office hasn't always been tethered to Trump.
Sure small crime to violate the presidential records act. But he raised his hand and took the pledge. He violated the law and the Piper going to collect.From the federal prosecutors and defense attorneys I am reading they say it is unlikely the FBI would have raided Trump’s house over document retention laws. It is highly likely to be related to more significant crimes.
It’s not a small crime and he should pay the piper for it but what I’m saying is that there is probably more to the story.Sure small crime to violate the presidential records act. But he raised his hand and took the pledge. He violated the law and the Piper going to collect.
He is probably worried that it is a trove of blackmail material that will become public and is concerned his status as a Russian asset will be made clear(er) to the world.
On this I'm inclined to disagree. I can't see them charging even if there were documents. The documents themselves need to be secured and I can see that being justification but I can't see them charging based on it even if there were some found.There is no way the FBI would raid Trump’s house unless there was a very high probability of an indictment.
Not to go full Godwin, but Hilter and Stalin were never convicted in court either. So I guess your belief they did bad things isn't legitimate.You believe he committed treason. There is a vast difference between your belief and a conviction. Right now, it can be conclusively proven that Trump has not been convicted of any such thing. That could well change in the following months.
I wasn't aware that Hitler or Stalin were alive and well in the US.Not to go full Godwin, but Hilter and Stalin were never convicted in court either. So I guess your belief they did bad things isn't legitimate.
Meanwhile, you all have no problem with cops executing unarmed people on the streets.
You mean our Teat, right?Oh no...the USA would lose it's penis! (and we could let them keep Don the Dick as well)
I love pointing out to those idiots what Trump did is no different then a smash and grab and crime is their #1 issue.Indeed, I just think this is a level or two above the usual... Fox is pushing CW here is it not? At a time where the constraints of society is at a bursting point ... Murdoch doubles down.. and then doubles down again.
It is if your voters elect people like MTGI’m going to go out on a limb here and say a federal criminal indictment is probably not good for a campaign.
Remember the quote - he’s not playing chess, he’s eating the pieces.