evident
Lifer
- Apr 5, 2005
- 12,153
- 774
- 126
I'm sorry...I don't wear tin-foil hats.You clearly are living in some alternate reality. You clearly read my post and chose to ignore the majority of it. Do you just ignore the things that you find too upsetting to think about? Does it just bounce off your bubble? I'm really trying to understand how minds like yours work.
Let me try again and see if it enters your bubble.
These are the questions and his responses
Q: Did you threaten to quit over the Comey Fallout? Can you say why...
A: No, I'm not Quitting
Q: Did you threaten to Quit?
A: No
Please Explain his FIRST reply.
I'm sorry...I don't wear tin-foil hats.
I'm sorry...I don't wear tin-foil hats.
Wow. And you did it again. You just ignored the post. This is absolutely crazy. It must be nice to just ignore the stuff that could potentially intrude on the fantasy you've built.
You're speculating using blinders by trying to pour esoteric meaning into the first question and answer which is immediately and completely dispelled by the second question and answer. There is nothing to see here except an incredibly pathetic attempt to validate the MSM lie by essentially calling Rosenstein the liar instead. If anyone is living in a fantasy world here...I'm afraid it's you.Wow. And you did it again. You just ignored the post. This is absolutely crazy. It must be nice to just ignore the stuff that could potentially intrude on the fantasy you've built.
Your knowledge of alternative facts doesn't make you special.You're speculating using blinders by trying to pour esoteric meaning into the first question and answer which is immediately and completely dispelled by the second question and answer. There is nothing to see here expect an incredibly pathetic attempt validate the MSM lie by essentially calling Rosenstein the liar instead. If anyone is living in a fantasy world here...I'm afraid it's you.
So many brain dead trolls who can't even articulate a coherent argument...so little time.Your knowledge of alternative facts doesn't make you special.
So many brain dead trolls who can't even articulate a coherent argument...so little time.
You're speculating using blinders by trying to pour esoteric meaning into the first question and answer which is immediately and completely dispelled by the second question and answer. There is nothing to see here expect an incredibly pathetic attempt validate the MSM lie by essentially calling Rosenstein the liar instead. If anyone is living in a fantasy world here...I'm afraid it's you.
I'm sorry...I don't wear tin-foil hats.
You just keep on beating up those straw men, buddy.So many brain dead trolls who can't even articulate a coherent argument...so little time.
Case in point.You just keep on beating up those straw men, buddy.
Democrats aren't upset that Trump fired Comey. They're upset that Trump provided such a transparently dishonest reason for why he fired Comey.You guys are being too hard on Chiro and DSF. They are clearly biased in favor of Trump and are making some logic errors but mostly errors of appreciation of the implications of certain actions. Nonetheless, there is some validity to some of their points, e.g.:
1. Rosenstein did deny reports of threatening to quit. This denial may not be credible, but you can't fault DSF & Chiro for taking it at face value.
2. Some left-leaning media and left-leaning members of this forum did support termination of Comey while Obama was president and there was an active investigation of Clinton. There is some hypocrisy there in saying that Trump's firing of Comey was improper.
-Importantly, Obama did not fire Comey while he was investigating Clinton, so just because some Democrats wanted him to does not allow you to generalize this hypocrisy to all Democrats
-Additionally, while there would have been a similar conflict of interest in firing Comey under the Obama administration, by no means does that imply that the conflict of interest in Trump's firing of Comey now is equivalent
- Ray Kelly, the former and longest-serving New York City police commissioner
- Mike Rogers, former House Intelligence Committee chairman and former FBI agent
- Former Assistant Attorney General Alice Fisher
- Rep. Trey Gowdy, R-S.C.
- Senate Majority Whip John Cornyn, R-Texas
- Paul Abbate, executive assistant director for the Criminal, Cyber, Response and Services Branch
- Former New York prosecutor Mike Garcia
- Mayor of Colorado Springs John Suthers
- Former federal appellate court Judge Michael Luttig, now executive vice president of Boeing
- Larry Thompson, former deputy attorney general under President George W. Bush
- Acting FBI Director Andrew McCabe
See my post above. You're arguing the bullshit narrative that's been spoonfed to you. And guess what? No one is falling for it except for you and the rest of the loyal Trump army.Case in point.
Whomever takes the offer, Trump always demands a loyalty oath.http://www.foxnews.com/politics/201...ite-house-confirms-shortlist-to-head-fbi.html
How many of these are Trump testicle bearers ?
http://www.foxnews.com/politics/201...ite-house-confirms-shortlist-to-head-fbi.html
How many of these are Trump testicle bearers ?
Try again. Your post above has NOTHING to do with my point. NOTHING.See my post above. You're arguing the bullshit narrative that's been spoonfed to you. And guess what? No one is falling for it except for you and the rest of the loyal Trump army.
All of them would be wise not to accept the job if offered. Trump treats his subordinates, even those confirmed by the Senate, as disposable. To be used when useful, and to be thrown under the bus when no longer useful.http://www.foxnews.com/politics/201...ite-house-confirms-shortlist-to-head-fbi.html
How many of these are Trump testicle bearers ?
Did you even have a point besides asserting that not listening to the MSM allows you to get away with with fantastical leaps of logic?Try again. Your post above has NOTHING to do with my point. NOTHING.
