Trump dissolved a working JCPOA. How much blame should Trump get for Israel and Iraq being at war?

Toggle sidebar Toggle sidebar

How much blame should be assigned to Trump for this war?

  • Total voters
    22
HomerJS

HomerJS

Lifer
Feb 6, 2002
38,403
31,354
136
Israel claims they are trying to stop Iraq's weapons grade enrichment program so they don't get a weapon. According to the IAEA and world governing bodies we had a working Iraq nuclear deal when Obama left office that Trump killed in his first term.

How much blame should be assigned for the current conflict?
 
P

Pontius Dilate

Member
Mar 28, 2008
155
258
136
I gave Trump 40%. 20% for blowing up the JCPOA and 20% for being such an easily manipulated demented narcissist idiot that he is happy to be Bibi's little sock puppet. 60% goes to Bibi and the rest of the criminals in the Israeli government for kicking this off.
 
  • Like
Reactions: [DHT]Osiris
BonzaiDuck

BonzaiDuck

Lifer
Jun 30, 2004
16,253
1,830
126
Pontius Dilate said:
I gave Trump 40%. 20% for blowing up the JCPOA and 20% for being such an easily manipulated demented narcissist idiot that he is happy to be Bibi's little sock puppet. 60% goes to Bibi and the rest of the criminals in the Israeli government for kicking this off.
Click to expand...
I think it was fair to blame him 100%, since a working agreement with Iran was in place when Obama left office.

Once again, just thinking about these things, I want to go out in public despite today's 100F heat, find a Trump supporter and deliver a round-house smack in his/her face with 5 year's reconstructive surgery. Trump inspires political violence in thought as well as in deed.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Sonikku and hal2kilo
P

Pontius Dilate

Member
Mar 28, 2008
155
258
136
BonzaiDuck said:
I think it was fair to blame him 100%, since a working agreement with Iran was in place when Obama left office.

Once again, just thinking about these things, I want to go out in public despite today's 100F heat, find a Trump supporter and deliver a round-house smack in his/her face with 5 year's reconstructive surgery. Trump inspires political violence in thought as well as in deed.
Click to expand...
Totally respect that and can agree. I think I'm operating under the assumption that even if Trump had not managed to undo the agreement for whatever reason, Bibi would still have found a way to kick this off and bring Trump along.
 
  • Like
Reactions: hal2kilo and ivwshane
HomerJS

HomerJS

Lifer
Feb 6, 2002
38,403
31,354
136
Pontius Dilate said:
Totally respect that and can agree. I think I'm operating under the assumption that even if Trump had not managed to undo the agreement for whatever reason, Bibi would still have found a way to kick this off and bring Trump along.
Click to expand...
That why I score it 50%. Bibi gets the other half
 
ivwshane

ivwshane

Lifer
May 15, 2000
33,294
16,626
136
Pontius Dilate said:
Totally respect that and can agree. I think I'm operating under the assumption that even if Trump had not managed to undo the agreement for whatever reason, Bibi would still have found a way to kick this off and bring Trump along.
Click to expand...

It certainly looks like bibi manipulated Trump into destroying the agreement, which would give cover/pretext for Israel to attack Iran.

I put 100% of the blame on Israel unless an independent body can verify Israel’s claim.
 
  • Like
Reactions: hal2kilo and Pontius Dilate
HomerJS

HomerJS

Lifer
Feb 6, 2002
38,403
31,354
136
Think about this, we are about to enter a war where...

Trump ended a working JCPOA to spite Obama
Bibi since the 90s said Iran was "weeks' from a nuclear bomb. He has said this almost 10 times to date.
Trump said he is ignoring his own DNI where she said Iran is no where close to a bomb
Trump is about to make a decision to enter our troops into war using foreign intelligence that could be a lie.

I'm changing my blame vote to 60%
 
Last edited:
Heartbreaker

Heartbreaker

Diamond Member
Apr 3, 2006
4,992
6,565
136
While Trump is a major world problem, in this case, he doesn't really seems to be much of a factor. With Trump Israel is less likely to face any US sanctions, but IMO they would have gone ahead regardless, because this Iran campaign has been planned for years, and the precursor work has been done.

Israel was never party to party to JCPOA, and didn't consider itself bound by, so it's kind of irrelevant.

Israel has been teeing this one up for a couple of years. The main visible actions were 2022-24 (Biden years).

Israel worked on dismantling Hezbollah, and wiping out most of their leaders and capability, and now Iran can't easily resupply/rebuild them through Syria.

Assad regime falling was a windfall gift to Israel that ended them as an Iran ally, and supply line for Hezbollah, and Israel also obliterated their military capability during the chaos and aftermath, just in case.

This means with two Iran allies/Proxies in their back yard crushed, Israel can focus on Iran. In hindsight the campaigns against Syria's and Hezbollah's capability is now clear.

With all the prelude work done, and what could be a unique window of opportunity, IMO they would have gone ahead even with Kamala Harris in the Whitehouse threatening sanctions, and JCPOA supported.

IMO, this is a major campaign aimed at doing serious damage to Iran regime, and taking out their military capability, along with degrading nuclear aspirations.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Pontius Dilate
HomerJS

HomerJS

Lifer
Feb 6, 2002
38,403
31,354
136
Heartbreaker said:
While Trump is a major world problem, in this case, he doesn't really seems to be much of a factor. With Trump Israel is less likely to face any US sanctions, but IMO they would have gone ahead regardless, because this Iran campaign has been planned for years, and the precursor work has been done.

Israel was never party to party to JCPOA, and didn't consider itself bound by, so it's kind of irrelevant.

Israel has been teeing this one up for a couple of years. The main visible actions were 2022-24 (Biden years).

Israel worked on dismantling Hezbollah, and wiping out most of their leaders and capability, and now Iran can't easily resupply/rebuild them through Syria.

Assad regime falling was a windfall gift to Israel that ended them as an Iran ally, and supply line for Hezbollah, and Israel also obliterated their military capability during the chaos and aftermath, just in case.

This means with two Iran allies/Proxies in their back yard crushed, Israel can focus on Iran. In hindsight the campaigns against Syria's and Hezbollah's capability is now clear.

With all the prelude work done, and what could be a unique window of opportunity, IMO they would have gone ahead even with Kamala Harris in the Whitehouse threatening sanctions, and JCPOA supported.

IMO, this is a major campaign aimed at doing serious damage to Iran regime, and taking out their military capability, along with degrading nuclear aspirations.
Click to expand...
So you believe Bibi THIS TIME when he says Iran is weeks away from a bomb?
 
  • Love
Reactions: feralkid
B

brycejones

Lifer
Oct 18, 2005
29,278
29,577
136
Heartbreaker said:
While Trump is a major world problem, in this case, he doesn't really seems to be much of a factor. With Trump Israel is less likely to face any US sanctions, but IMO they would have gone ahead regardless, because this Iran campaign has been planned for years, and the precursor work has been done.

Israel was never party to party to JCPOA, and didn't consider itself bound by, so it's kind of irrelevant.

Israel has been teeing this one up for a couple of years. The main visible actions were 2022-24 (Biden years).

Israel worked on dismantling Hezbollah, and wiping out most of their leaders and capability, and now Iran can't easily resupply/rebuild them through Syria.

Assad regime falling was a windfall gift to Israel that ended them as an Iran ally, and supply line for Hezbollah, and Israel also obliterated their military capability during the chaos and aftermath, just in case.

This means with two Iran allies/Proxies in their back yard crushed, Israel can focus on Iran. In hindsight the campaigns against Syria's and Hezbollah's capability is now clear.

With all the prelude work done, and what could be a unique window of opportunity, IMO they would have gone ahead even with Kamala Harris in the Whitehouse threatening sanctions, and JCPOA supported.

IMO, this is a major campaign aimed at doing serious damage to Iran regime, and taking out their military capability, along with degrading nuclear aspirations.
Click to expand...
You really misspelled:

Bibi needs to distract from his criminal cases and failure to obtain the return of all the hostages from Gaza.
 
  • Haha
Reactions: hal2kilo
Jaskalas

Jaskalas

Lifer
Jun 23, 2004
35,276
9,472
136
HomerJS said:
Do you you think our military should enter the war just on the word of Israel?
Click to expand...
Even if Iran had no intent before, they sure as hell do after Israel's attack.
For anyone wanting to stop nuclear proliferation, there is only one step forward.
For anyone who does not care, there are still plenty of options.
 
  • Like
Reactions: thilanliyan
Sonikku

Sonikku

Lifer
Jun 23, 2005
15,876
4,866
136
Jaskalas said:
Even if Iran had no intent before, they sure as hell do after Israel's attack.
For anyone wanting to stop nuclear proliferation, there is only one step forward.
For anyone who does not care, there are still plenty of options.
Click to expand...
What brilliant logic. They weren't working one before, so lets attack them. So they have reason to work on one. So we can war with them...
 
cytg111

cytg111

Lifer
Mar 17, 2008
25,470
14,979
136
Heartbreaker

Heartbreaker

Diamond Member
Apr 3, 2006
4,992
6,565
136
HomerJS said:
Do you you think our military should enter the war just on the word of Israel?
Click to expand...

Again no. Why do you keep seeing things, I didn't write.

I thought this was about how much responsibility lies with Trump vs Israel. It's ALL Israel.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

TRENDING THREADS

COMPANY
RESOURCES
FOLLOW
Top Bottom