Trump asks at briefing if he can nuke hurricanes to stop them (Not The Onion)

theeedude

Lifer
Feb 5, 2006
35,787
6,197
126
https://thehill.com/homenews/admini...urricanes-to-stop-them-from-hitting-us-report
"They start forming off the coast of Africa, as they're moving across the Atlantic, we drop a bomb inside the eye of the hurricane and it disrupts it. Why can't we do that?" the source added, paraphrasing the president's remarks.
The source told Axios that the briefer responded with something to the effect of "Sir, we'll look into that."
It's better to stay quiet and be thought of as a fool than to open your mouth and remove all doubt.
 

snoopy7548

Diamond Member
Jan 1, 2005
8,243
5,321
146
I mean, on the one hand he's an idiot, and on the other he's a fucking moron.
 

Sunburn74

Diamond Member
Oct 5, 2009
5,076
2,635
136
..... not sure what to say. There are so many obvious problems with discharging nukes to try and stop hurricanes that I don't even know where to start.
 

balloonshark

Diamond Member
Jun 5, 2008
7,058
3,541
136
It's frightening that people are actually proud to have voted for and still support this human.

kaboom.jpg
 
  • Like
Reactions: DarthKyrie

Moonbeam

Elite Member
Nov 24, 1999
74,569
6,711
126
It should be fine if the hurricane is heading into Trump land. They deserve that kind of rescue.

Just kidding.
 

Hayabusa Rider

Admin Emeritus & Elite Member
Jan 26, 2000
50,879
4,268
126
..... not sure what to say. There are so many obvious problems with discharging nukes to try and stop hurricanes that I don't even know where to start.

The greatest problem is that there aren't enough bombs to do that. It would involve changing the entire planetary weather system in one stroke.
 

trenchfoot

Lifer
Aug 5, 2000
15,667
8,210
136
If nothing else, at least we can trust Trump in solving the overpopulation problem.

He's already working on that with his ripping the guts out of the EPA. I'm really surprised he hasn't taken to undoing all the work it took to convince people that smoking cigarettes causes cancer yet. You know, to help out those poor distressed mega-wealthy corporate owned tobacco growers in the south.

I'm sure most of his supporters would start smoking their lungs into black coal sacs if he asked them to.
 

DrDoug

Diamond Member
Jan 16, 2014
3,580
1,629
136
This is believable from him. Simple mind yields simple solutions because everything is simple. Someone ought to tell him that it's the wind farms that stir up hurricanes just to see him go off again on windmills.

His solution would be to nuke the wind farms.
 

uallas5

Golden Member
Jun 3, 2005
1,624
1,872
136
This is believable from him. Simple mind yields simple solutions because everything is simple. Someone ought to tell him that it's the wind farms that stir up hurricanes just to see him go off again on windmills.

His solution would be to nuke the wind farms.

Even better, someone should tell him that wind farms help with hurricanes cause, ya know, they use up all the wind.
 

DrDoug

Diamond Member
Jan 16, 2014
3,580
1,629
136
No, no, no. Tell him we can run the wind turbines in reverse like giant fans and blow the hurricanes away.

Even better... one set of fans running backwards to suck up the hurricanes, and a second set behind the first that points up so we can send the hurricanes into space.
 
  • Like
Reactions: theeedude

BoomerD

No Lifer
Feb 26, 2006
66,037
14,444
146
I read a sci-fi novel maybe 30-40 years ago in which that actually worked for tornadoes...DON'T remember if they were nukes or not.
I can't believe King Donnie the Dotard actually read a book...
 

Paratus

Lifer
Jun 4, 2004
17,550
15,637
146
Just so folks understand the relative amounts of energy involved here.

  • Atomic Bomb (Hiroshima): 6.3x10^13 joules of energy
  • Tsar Bomba (largest bomb ever detonated): 2.4x10^17 joules
  • Average Hurricane - Rain formation: 5.2x10^19joules/day + 1.2x10^17joules/day of wind kinetic energy.
  • Increase in Ocean Heat Content 0-2000m over the last 50 years from global warming: 3.4x10^23joules.

So your average hurricane is putting out the equivalent of about 10 A-bombs a second or 1 Tsar Bomba every 6.5-7.0 minutes.

The increase in ocean heat could provide enough energy for an extra hurricane every day for 18 years. (Or the equivalent of detonating 3+ Tsar Bombas per hour or 205 A-Bombs per minute for 50 years).

(Folks like @SlowSpyder don’t believe that amount of energy will ever make any change whatsoever in the environment because Al Gore is a wizard).
 

Sunburn74

Diamond Member
Oct 5, 2009
5,076
2,635
136
Just so folks understand the relative amounts of energy involved here.

  • Atomic Bomb (Hiroshima): 6.3x10^13 joules of energy
  • Tsar Bomba (largest bomb ever detonated): 2.4x10^17 joules
  • Average Hurricane - Rain formation: 5.2x10^19joules/day + 1.2x10^17joules/day of wind kinetic energy.
  • Increase in Ocean Heat Content 0-2000m over the last 50 years from global warming: 3.4x10^23joules.

So your average hurricane is putting out the equivalent of about 10 A-bombs a second or 1 Tsar Bomba every 6.5-7.0 minutes.

The increase in ocean heat could provide enough energy for an extra hurricane every day for 18 years. (Or the equivalent of detonating 3+ Tsar Bombas per hour or 205 A-Bombs per minute for 50 years).

(Folks like @SlowSpyder don’t believe that amount of energy will ever make any change whatsoever in the environment because Al Gore is a wizard).
At minimum, discharging nukes over hurricanes repeatedly would cause severe ecological damage, spread radioactive fallout throughout the world through air and water contamination, and potentially create tsunamis and mass flooding in off target coastal areas and islands. I'm not even going to get into the geo-political crap storm it would create (we'd probably be kicked out of NATO and every trade and security agreement we are in today and would essentially release the political shackles on nuclear proliferation throughout the world, which means all it takes is one bad leader or one turncoat banana republic general or renegade terrorist group somewhere with a taste for vengeance to create armageddon).
 

IronWing

No Lifer
Jul 20, 2001
72,415
32,997
136
At minimum, discharging nukes over hurricanes repeatedly would cause severe ecological damage, spread radioactive fallout throughout the world through air and water contamination, and potentially create tsunamis and mass flooding in off target coastal areas and islands. I'm not even going to get into the geo-political crap storm it would create (we'd probably be kicked out of NATO and every trade and security agreement we are in today and would essentially release the political shackles on nuclear proliferation throughout the world, which means all it takes is one bad leader or one turncoat banana republic general or renegade terrorist group somewhere with a taste for vengeance to create armageddon).
Yeah but it would look freakin' awesome! Imagine the Castle Bravo poster inside a hurricane. :cool: