Trump and House Republicans trying to kill deal underway on the border.

Page 6 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.

fskimospy

Elite Member
Mar 10, 2006
87,934
55,285
136
So pardon my shallow understanding of this issue when I ask out loud, now that it is known without doubt that the Republicans want to give Trump and themselves the immigration issue as a hot topic to run against the Democrats and will never agree to any deal concerning immigration from the south, why is it that Biden and the Democrats haven't now offered up aid to Ukraine as a stand alone issue because of how critical it is for Ukraine to win their war against Putin?
Here you go -

 
  • Like
Reactions: trenchfoot

K1052

Elite Member
Aug 21, 2003
52,594
46,239
136
So pardon my shallow understanding of this issue when I ask out loud, now that it is known without doubt that the Republicans want to give Trump and themselves the immigration issue as a hot topic to run against the Democrats and will never agree to any deal concerning immigration from the south, why is it that Biden and the Democrats haven't now offered up aid to Ukraine as a stand alone issue because of how critical it is for Ukraine to win their war against Putin?

Republicans insisted for months that the supplemental be paired with immigration legislation to satisfy GOP conservatives. Lankford succeeded in securing the most conservative immigration legislative compromise in my lifetime however in the interim Trump decided he wanted to run on immigration. Thus the house GOP was instructed to oppose any legislation while vacillating between "we don't need any legislation" and "this legislation does not go far enough". There is increasing chatter that we're going to see a stand alone supplemental now that the GOP opposes the deal they demanded. I assume they will find excuses to oppose the stand alone as well.

Biden is going to be soon down to unilateral options and he has quite a few but probably doesn't want to deploy them until he's out of options with congress.
 

cytg111

Lifer
Mar 17, 2008
26,115
15,558
136
Cause standalone Johnson wants a detailed plan for what the money will be used for and what actual gains on the front it will achieve. Otherwise its just money out the window.
 

K1052

Elite Member
Aug 21, 2003
52,594
46,239
136
Cause standalone Johnson wants a detailed plan for what the money will be used for and what actual gains on the front it will achieve. Otherwise its just money out the window.

This is just an excuse. He's willing to give Israel non offset aid now with no such conditions or questions.

As for what it's used for mostly to pay Americans at American companies to make American products.
 

Franz316

Golden Member
Sep 12, 2000
1,024
543
136
Is there a way to bring this to vote without Johnson's decision to do so with some moderate Republican support?
 

K1052

Elite Member
Aug 21, 2003
52,594
46,239
136
Is there a way to bring this to vote without Johnson's decision to do so with some moderate Republican support?

Maybe a discharge petition for the foreign aid component but I think thats increasingly unlikely as mod Rs are less likely to buck Trump now.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Franz316

trenchfoot

Lifer
Aug 5, 2000
15,772
8,348
136
@fskimospy, @K1052, thanks for the informative replies. So then it's the Republicans that are tying Ukraine aid to any form of immigration reforms that they will then never agree to because Trump wants to exploit the immigration issue to his advantage. Party over country, fuck 'Merica! WhiteUSA! WhiteUSA! WhiteUSA!

All the more reason for the Democrats to attempt their best at forming up a unified gov't to get past this GOP centric blockade while expanding the SCOTUS with justices that aren't beholden to corruptive corporate interests and religious fanatics.
 

eelw

Lifer
Dec 4, 1999
10,334
5,487
136
Best thing is, let’s say Haley becomes POTUS. This exact bill will be one of the first items with new congress
 

fskimospy

Elite Member
Mar 10, 2006
87,934
55,285
136
Nah tax cuts then nothing else.
Yeah, no way this bill passes with a Republican POTUS. Democrats really want to help Ukraine right now and immunize Biden on the immigration issue so they are willing to give Republicans a much better deal than they would otherwise get. After the 2024 election this will be off the table.

You are right though. Like they might TRY to pass an immigration bill but they will fail and then just go cut taxes for rich people and call it a day.
 

K1052

Elite Member
Aug 21, 2003
52,594
46,239
136
Yeah, no way this bill passes with a Republican POTUS. Democrats really want to help Ukraine right now and immunize Biden on the immigration issue so they are willing to give Republicans a much better deal than they would otherwise get. After the 2024 election this will be off the table.

You are right though. Like they might TRY to pass an immigration bill but they will fail and then just go cut taxes for rich people and call it a day.

I mean we literally saw this show in the first Trump term. They did a big tax cut and then sorta tired to do immigration and nothing could get 60 votes in the Senate. Trump also sabotaged his wall deal by demanding massive cuts to legal immigration after he had already agreed. There is no reason whatsoever to think that congressional Rs or Trump can do any better the next time around.
 

hal2kilo

Lifer
Feb 24, 2009
26,023
12,262
136
I mean we literally saw this show in the first Trump term. They did a big tax cut and then sorta tired to do immigration and nothing could get 60 votes in the Senate. Trump also sabotaged his wall deal by demanding massive cuts to legal immigration after he had already agreed. There is no reason whatsoever to think that congressional Rs or Trump can do any better the next time around.
And months of Infrastructure weeks, resulting in nada.
 

K1052

Elite Member
Aug 21, 2003
52,594
46,239
136
It would be something if Rs do actually turn to an unbundled supplemental and pass it. The Senate seems inclined even if House leadership is not enthused.

You better believe defense contractors are lobbying the hell out of the hill and it's an election year ($).
 

gothuevos

Diamond Member
Jul 28, 2010
3,439
2,397
136
I mean we literally saw this show in the first Trump term. They did a big tax cut and then sorta tired to do immigration and nothing could get 60 votes in the Senate. Trump also sabotaged his wall deal by demanding massive cuts to legal immigration after he had already agreed. There is no reason whatsoever to think that congressional Rs or Trump can do any better the next time around.

Lots and lots of executive action is what you will see from Trump.

And when/if SCOTUS tries to shoot some of it down, he will "dare the courts to enforce it," as JD Vance put it.
 
  • Like
Reactions: hal2kilo

K1052

Elite Member
Aug 21, 2003
52,594
46,239
136
Lots and lots of executive action is what you will see from Trump.

And when/if SCOTUS tries to shoot some of it down, he will "dare the courts to enforce it," as JD Vance put it.

This is actually a good argument why SCOTUS should decide in the negative for the absurd idea of presidential immunity. Conservatives spent decades gaming the system to obtain power to do policy in the courts that they could never do in the legislature. Trump coming to power threatens to negate all their hard work if the country falls apart.
 

K1052

Elite Member
Aug 21, 2003
52,594
46,239
136
CBP union has backed the compromise border bill. There is a non zero chance of a meaningful political tab to turn a 180 from demanding border legislation to refusing what's on the table now because Trump told Rs to.
 

Pens1566

Lifer
Oct 11, 2005
13,721
11,333
136
CBP union has backed the compromise border bill. There is a non zero chance of a meaningful political tab to turn a 180 from demanding border legislation to refusing what's on the table now because Trump told Rs to.

Yeah, gonna be some political gymnastics to go against that news when they've been trotting them out for photo ops for years now.

Not saying they won't try it, but ...
 

K1052

Elite Member
Aug 21, 2003
52,594
46,239
136
Yeah, gonna be some political gymnastics to go against that news when they've been trotting them out for photo ops for years now.

Not saying they won't try it, but ...

CBP would see a massive increase in funding due to this bill. Everybody should start asking why Trump wants to defund them.
 

brycejones

Lifer
Oct 18, 2005
29,844
30,611
136
CBP would see a massive increase in funding due to this bill. Everybody should start asking why Trump wants to defund them.
Why does the House GQP Majority want to defund them? That would make for some great political ads.
 
Dec 10, 2005
28,604
13,691
136
Once again, House Republicans are seeking to repeat history and kill what is effectively a fabulous immigration deal/win (for the right).
 
  • Like
Reactions: hal2kilo

K1052

Elite Member
Aug 21, 2003
52,594
46,239
136
Once again, House Republicans are seeking to repeat history and kill what is effectively a fabulous immigration deal/win (for the right).

This thing is head and shoulders above anything the Rs had ever gotten or likely will ever get.
 

trenchfoot

Lifer
Aug 5, 2000
15,772
8,348
136
Once again, House Republicans are seeking to repeat history and kill what is effectively a fabulous immigration deal/win (for the right).


Without this hyped up into the stratosphere immigration ape shit to throw at Biden and the Democrats, for all practical purposes Trump and the GOP spinmeisters don't have much else to arm themselves with. Their attempt at linking Hunter Biden to his dad is fizzling, the economy is on the uptick, jobs are available for the taking and Biden's BBBA program is making favorable results.

What the Republicans cannot do is brag about the major accomplishments that directly benefit all of the nation's citizens they've made in the Era of Trump because they haven't any. And they as the party of do nothings except scream bloody murder about their victimhood are furiously diverting the nation's peoples away from that 'lil tidbit of legislative factual history.
 

JTsyo

Lifer
Nov 18, 2007
12,031
1,131
126
Maybe a discharge petition for the foreign aid component but I think thats increasingly unlikely as mod Rs are less likely to buck Trump now.
Both houses of Congress needs a way to bypass the one person in leadership and bring important things up for a vote.
 

Pens1566

Lifer
Oct 11, 2005
13,721
11,333
136
This is definitely amusing to watch.

House GQP needs something to run on in November just as much (if not more so) as Trump does. They've done NOTHING for the entire congress. So they need "OMG the boarder!!!!!" issue to instill fear and scream about during their klan, er, I mean campaign rallies. Otherwise, they're going to get smoked even more than is already in the cards.
 
  • Like
Reactions: trenchfoot