So what you're saying is that Emerson college is stupid and has no idea how to do a poll, and they have no idea how to make adjustments to the data for such things. Not that I'm saying the poll is accurate (I have no idea).
I'm not saying they're stupid, but they're definitely reaching by citing a poll that size and with a glaring omission in its data. The bigger issue, to me, is that
The Hill took the poll and ran with it, making it seem bigger than it really is. Yes, that does point out problems with the media (I did say "mostly" trustworthy, not completely), but in this case it's mainly an exaggeration.
Your opinion =/= absolute truth.
It's not just my opinion; it's demonstrated by empirical evidence. Let me rattle off just some of the lies we've seen in the first few weeks:
- Inauguration crowd size (it was smaller than Bush Jr.'s, not the largest ever)
- The Bowling Green "massacre" (never existed, and Conway did not just 'misspeak')
- "It's not a ban" (even though Trump and Spicer said it was a ban before)
- Conway's "alternative facts" (i.e. lies)
- Chicago crime is mainly due to illegal immigrants (there's no evidence to support this)
- The US crime rate is at a 47-year high (FBI data shows that it's actually near a record low)
- The Yemen raid went perfectly (it was a disaster)
- There have been many terrorist attacks the press didn't cover (the list of 'examples' included some of the most heavily-covered attacks in recent history)
- Equivocating the US with Russia (when's the last time a US President had a political opponent killed with radiation poisoning?)
- All polls showing that Trump is unpopular are "fake news"
Need I go on? I'm not saying the media is flawless, but they're squeaky clean compared to this administration.