2 things. First, this:
There is a weighting associated with age, but that does not necessarily correct the issue, especially in a sample of only 617.
Second, you can't make up data for cases that didn't respond, even with weighting. Weighting a small sample like this is a terrible idea as well.
I have a Masters degree in Political Science, specializing in Public Opinion & Polling. This poll is not complete garbage, but it is absolutely not proof of anything.
Nope. Mine is from a great University. So are my other two degrees. Didn't read the gallup data, but I'd take a look if you link it.Did you get your degree from Trump University perhaps??
Apparently you also think Gallup is full of crap then, because their polls came to fairly similar conclusions?
So even though you have 3 degrees you can't google it yourself?Nope. Mine is from a great University. So are my other two degrees. Didn't read the gallup data, but I'd take a look if you link it.
yeah, that's right. obviously i'm retarded.So even though you have 3 degrees you can't google it yourself?
So what you're saying is that Emerson college is stupid and has no idea how to do a poll, and they have no idea how to make adjustments to the data for such things. Not that I'm saying the poll is accurate (I have no idea).
I don't believe that's true. I think the media has changed fundamentally. The internet has come along and given everyone a nice little echo chamber to help polarize views. At the same time, fox news came along and showed that you can get waaaaaay better ratings by appealing directly to political perspective rather than just "reporting the news". Most of the media always had a lefty bias to some extent, but now many have just gone all out without even the pretense of being unbiased. As things get more polarized, a lot of the media has decided to choose sides rather than report the news.
Nope. Mine is from a great University. So are my other two degrees. Didn't read the gallup data, but I'd take a look if you link it.
http://www.gallup.com/poll/195542/americans-trust-mass-media-sinks-new-low.aspxConservative media has spent the better part of two decades now programming their audience to distrust any media outside the conservative bubble, so their mistrust is just a given. The credibility of the media among liberals has taken a major hit recently, at least in my own opinion, not because of a lack of truthfulness on the part of the mainstream media, but because they kept Trump in the game for far too long due to his ratings bonanza. The false equivalency they peddled between Clinton's emails and Trump was beyond the pale, and is the reason he got elected. They held Trump to his own standard, while holding Clinton to a presidential standard, and now we have Trump in the white house because of it.
Conservative media has spent the better part of two decades now programming their audience to distrust any media outside the conservative bubble, so their mistrust is just a given.
I'd be interested in seeing who the hell picks up the phone and takes part in these surveys.
Caller ID is a beautiful thing...
We're probably never going to agree about the media's biases, but the polarization of American culture, where right has moved right and left has moved left, is undeniable. It's also pretty hard to argue against the notion that the facts usually rest somewhere in between these extremes that we seem to be running toward. Accordingly, a news media which basically reports the facts will be increasingly distrusted by people because what it reports will not line up with what people want to believe, and both sides will increasingly conclude that the media has a political bias against their side.
The fact that more conservatives believe this than liberals is an expected and predictable consequences of the data (i.e. DW Nominate) which documents this polarization trend, whereby both left and right move further apart but the right is moving faster than the left. If the left ever manages to catch up, then we'll be at a point where 90% of each side thinks the media is biased, but for totally opposite, and logically inconsistent, reasons. At that point, sanity will be a thing of the past and we'll have a lot more to worry about than our disagreements about media bias.
Lastly, I will remind you that what people say about the media's credibility has nothing to do with its actual credibility. Polls measure perception, not reality.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Argumentum_ad_populum
You can spew that drivel all you like, but the media itself has driven the distrust. You can only lie so many times before people realize you're not to be trusted.
People that still own landlines, of course.
Yeah, because I'm sure they would promote slavish devotion and belief in the media no matter how biased and no matter how often they are caught lying and pushing one political perspective /s
We still have a landline and majority of our friends and acquaintances still have landlines.
General consensus has been "don't know the number...don't pick up" for quite some time.
This is true, you have ruined your reputation on the forums long ago.
![]()
I don't disagree with that, but you're still starting with the assumption that the media hasn't changed, that it's just the public that has changed. I don't buy that. The media has adapted to their new environment like any business does. Straight reporting the news simply isn't as profitable these days as driving the news and a narrative. I don't know how you'd say the public has changed but conclude that the media hasn't adapted with the public.
Remember that we're talking about trust in the media. Trust is based on perception. In this case, perception is reality, like it or not.
Donald J. TrumpVerified account@realDonaldTrump
'Trump administration seen as more truthful than news media' http://bit.ly/2k4b0imEmersonPoll …
Oh teh noes! I have a bad reputation on AT P&N, oh what will I do?![]()
