smackababy
Lifer
- Oct 30, 2008
- 27,024
- 79
- 86
Ah, the old "you're a virgin" argument. Man, I remember that one. It was real effective, and then I turned 12.
ESPN pays him to write for them but tell us how much you disagree. The desperation in this forum by fanboys like the one above is rich. Writing whatever rigmarole you wrote in all caps only conveys that... you've never actually touched a woman. In fact, next time you write a woman on website Plenty of Desperation, be sure to type in all caps to her about the Pats. She'll be so impressed by your devotion to TB12 (whom you've never met but swear you will someday) that she'll promptly reply with her address to fuck.
ESPN pays him to write for them but tell us how much you disagree. The desperation in this forum by fanboys like the one above is rich. Writing whatever rigmarole you wrote in all caps only conveys that... you've never actually touched a woman. In fact, next time you write a woman on website Plenty of Desperation, be sure to type in all caps to her about the Pats. She'll be so impressed by your devotion to TB12 (whom you've never met but swear you will someday) that she'll promptly reply with her address to fuck.
Honestly. You should probably take some time, read through the ruling, come to your own conclusions, then make up your own mind. It seems you come to some emotion based ill thought out conclusion and try to find something to confirm it. That's why you generally post garbage from people like Munson and then get pummeled on this forum.
Evidence is not destroyed if you can subpoena it and get it directly from the phone company, which they can. However, they cannot get non-material info, like they can if he handed over the phone. Lawyers would do e-discovery and if they are found to not turn over everything they can be held in contempt and disbarred. A much higher burden of proof.Took a page from Goodell's book from past Patriot scandals, destroy the evidence.
Took a page from Goodell's book from past Patriot scandals, destroy the evidence.
Took a page from Goodell's book from past Patriot scandals, destroy the evidence.
You guys are silly, this case is far from over. In fact, there is still a good chance the NFL will win the appeal according to ESPN's legal analyst.
I'm more interested how this will affect fantasy prospects. Only person I'm drafting will be Blount, especially with Lafell all fucked up and Edelman one concussion away from becoming the next Wes Welker.
Tom ain't winning any court case in the foreseeable future.
All you Brady lovers need to accept reality, he cheated and he's fucked.
hahahahahaha
This is a slam dunk court case for the NFL, Brady needs to drop it so his franchise can move on.
Brady will not win in a NY court where the NFL just filed...
At this point it's like Pats fans are running around chasing their tails looking for some way tom can wriggle out of his suspension. Let's face it, get on the bad side of the NFL and you're toast. It doesn't matter what you think, if their kangaroo court says you are suspended, you will be suspended. A federal judge isn't going to save you
Checking back in, looks like things are going as planned. Goodell/NFL always win.
:biggrin:You guys are silly, this case is far from over. In fact, there is still a good chance the NFL will win the appeal according to ESPN's legal analyst.
:biggrin:
Sp33d is approaching "eits talking about RG3" levels now.
A good article - The arrogance of Roger Goodell
LMAO, Judge Berman put a poison pill in his ruling by not ruling on several other issues, if the NFL's appeal is 'successful', it will go back to Berman and he can rule against the NFL on those issues as well:
http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.co...ans-ruling-may-contain-a-warning-for-the-nfl/
I like that one
its also pretty sad that's people dislike of the pats/brady (for whatever reason) is overshadowing the blatant abuse of power/rules/bullshit the NFL is trying to pull
Appearing at the top of the last full page of the 40-page ruling is the list of claims from Brady and the NFL Players Association that Judge Berman saw no need to address, including:
(1) whether Commissioner Roger Goodell was “evidently partial” in presiding over the appeal of Brady’s suspension;
(2) whether Goodell’s conclusions regarding Brady’s knowledge of and involvement in the alleged deflation scheme exceeded the findings of the Ted Wells report; and
(3) whether Goodell undermined his competency to serve as arbitrator by publicly praising the work of Ted Wells.
a) Brady argues that Commissioner Goodell was "evidently partial" within the meaning of 9
U.S.C. § I O(a)(2), contending, among other things, that "a central ground of [his] appeal
was the issue of Goodell improperly delegating to Vincent his exclusive authority to
discipline players for conduct detrimental to the NFL." Def.'s Countercl. '1[165.
b) Brady argues that "Goodell purports to sustain the suspension on factual conclusions that
Brady participated in ball tampering- but those factual conclusions [that "Mr. Brady
knew about, approved of, consented to, and provided inducements and rewards in support
of a scheme by which, with Mr. Jastremski's support, Mr. McNally tampered with the
game balls"] appear nowhere in the Wells Report and were not the basis for the discipline
imposed by Vincent." Def.'s Countercl. '1[126. Brady contends that "Judge Doty's
ruling in Peterson makes clear than an Article 46 arbitrator lacks CBA authority to justifY
discipline on a basis not found in the discipline being appealed." !d. (citing Adrian
Peterson, 2015 WL 795253, at *6).
c) Brady also argues that "prior to serving as hearing officer, the Commissioner publicly
lauded the reliability of the Wells Report [which was conducted by NFL retained
counsel]- the issue at the very heart of Brady's appeal." This "locked him into
supporting the Wells Report and rendered him incapable of reaching a contrary
conclusion in Brady's appeal, as doing so would undermine his own competency as
Commissioner."
Rely on it how? Are they going to stop wearing helmets while playing? Purposely run into walls? Lol.
At the very worst they're going to shell out a few bucks for some water that they likely would have spent on Gatorade or soda anyway. This attempt to impugn someone else to distract from your own guys' actions are honestly a little sad.
