- Oct 9, 1999
- 46,934
- 10,817
- 147
Read this article as a companion to the piece you read. Gives a lot more information as to the rules and what rules were broken.for more information and for a better understanding of what was left out of the piece today.
Promoting Parity
Wow. Here I was in my last post opining that BB probably broke the rules, albeit to not great advantage. But what this article points out is that the NFL rules on taping are at best, vague, incomplete and, at points, entirely contradictory, and that therefore BB's assertion that he was following the rules as he best understood them had and has strong merit.
It puts Goodell's decision to punish the Pats for Spygate in an even worse light than before, and portrays what most everyone now sees as his subsequent overreaction during Deflategate as so indefensible as to constitute not just misfeasance, but malfeasance.
Without looking into it all too closely, I always thought that the NFL was less bound by near 19th century tradition than MLB, being a younger, more modern entity, and so was run far better.
I had thought that the NFL, from around the time before the AFL-NFL merger on, was a lean, modern, media savvy, money-making machine wherein the owners knew it was best to cede considerable power to a technocrat who would lead them all to greater riches.
Whereas MLB was still tradition-bound and mired in a past where a more individually powerful collection of owners positively loved having an good old boy, "don't rock the boat" mediocrity like Bud Selig running the ship.
I guess I was wrong about the NFL being so different.
