First of all SYG was never presented at the trial, it was not a part of the defense...the jurors were instructed properly and they came to the only verdict that the evidence supported, emotional bullshit and racism be damned. They were persuaded by the bullshit narrative the media put out of a little innocent angel, but none of the evidence then or since has shown that TM was an innocent little angel, in fact quite to the contrary especially considering things we know about him that they couldn't bring up at trial...so go be butthurt somewhere else and let this die so we can stop hearing about that dumb ass...and I'm referring to GZ right there
That is exactly right on part of your first sentence. And the instructions had the jurors confused on stand your ground law/rules and the manslaughter charges and they asked for clarification which they never received. In addition the one juror who was married to that attorney who was associated with the case was carrying on about the stand your ground law further confusing the jurors. The way some of the interviews went with some of the jurors showed that she was key in persuading and confusing the other jurors.
Quote: "Zimmerman Juror: Stand Your Ground A Reason Why Neither Second Degree Murder Nor Manslaughter Applied. An anonymous member of the jury appeared on Anderson Cooper 360 on July 15 to discuss how Florida's Stand Your Ground law provided a legal justification for Zimmerman's actions. According to the juror, neither charge against Zimmerman applied "because of the heat of the moment and the Stand Your Ground" Link Here
http://mediamatters.org/research/2013/07/16/media-neglect-that-stand-your-ground-is-centerp/194916
Quote from juror interview: JUROR: We just starting looking at the law, what exactly we could find and how we should vote for this case. And the law became very confusing.
ANDERSON COOPER: Yeah, tell me about that.
JUROR: It became very confusing. We had stuff thrown at us. We had the second-degree murder charge, the manslaughter charge, then we had self-defense, Stand Your Ground, and I think there was one other one.
[...]
COOPER: Did you feel like you understood the instructions from the judge, because they were very complex. I mean reading them, they were tough to follow.
JUROR: Right. And that was our problem. It was just so confusing what went with what and what we could apply to what. Because there was a couple of them in there that wanted to find him guilty of something. And after hours and hours and hours of deliberating over the law and reading it over and over and over again, we decided there is just no way -- other place to go.
COOPER: Because of the two options you had, second-degree murder or manslaughter, you felt neither applied.
JUROR:
Right. Well because of the heat of the moment and the Stand Your Ground. He had a right to defend himself. If he felt threatened that his life was going to be taken away from him or that he was going to have bodily harm, he had a right. [CNN, Anderson Cooper 360, 7/15/13]