Originally posted by: Bleep
What a bunch of crap.
Maetryx, do you think that Moonbeam is unable to defend himself and you have to do it for him? This is the ultimate insult to Moonbeam, you are emplying that he/she is not capable or smart enough to defend themself.
Bleep
Originally posted by: maladroit
Speaking in first person plural and using a lot of infinitives in your writing does not necessarily make you smarter than everyone. If you equate big words with smart, then I would recommend you take an english course, my friend.
Originally posted by: klah
If we do not push our questions beyond the limits within which possible experience can present us with its object, we shall never dream of seeking to inform ourselves about the objects of our senses as they are in themselves, that is, out of all relation to the senses. But if the individual takes appearances for things in themselves, and as existing in and by themselves, then whether he be a materialist who admits into his system nothing but matter alone, or a spiritualist who admits only thinking beings (that is, beings with the form of our inner sense), or a dualist who accepts both, he will always, owing to this misunderstanding, be entangled in pseudo-rational speculations as to how that which is not a thing in itself, but only the appearance of a thing in general, can exist by itself.
- The Philosophy of Moonbeam
Originally posted by: Maetryx....... I disagree. We only have our minds. The world is as it appears. We can trust our basic sensory perceptions.
Originally posted by: luv2chill
Despite your good intentions Maetryx, I don't know if Moonbeam really needed or wanted this thread to be posted.
Originally posted by: luvly
Oh, and I should add: I'm also proud of Moonbeam because he learns to shun people who have nothing better to say than argument against the person. Moonbeam stands up proudly for himself. I therefore make no attempts to speak on behalf of him. He can handle the no-so-sophisticated without my assistance. :Q Goooooooooo Moonbeam!!!!!
Originally posted by: Kiyup
Well, all his posts say this with different wording:
"Love yourself and the world will have no problems"
If you cant take the heat, get outta the kitchen.Originally posted by: Maetryx
Seriously:
How many of us would silently accept the name-calling (and name mangling) abuse that Moonbeam undergoes constantly? The replies to his writings almost always start off with "Moonie" and typically insult and attack him personally.
If you have a logically superior response to his position, please present it. I get tired of people blowing off Moonbeam, and I honestly think it stems from an inability to formulate a reasoned response.
Don't even kid yourself. Moonbeam is SMART. If you don't think his writings makes sense, YOU are the underacheiver. Build a better argument, then spout off. Stop embarassing yourself.
In reference to this thread and many others...
Note: gender assumed (and then confirmed by luv2chill)
My guess is that you are not as good as most people at being dead, and
long burried emotional issues that most people successfully avoid ever
knowing they have, are in your case bubbling to the surface. Maybe you
have begun to see that everything is totally meaningless and that the
world is upside down. If so, it would help if you could get yourself into
a position where you can explore and face the domons that haunt our inner
world. It's an unfortunate fact that the door to paradice is at the end of
a journey through hell. One thing that may be of some use is the certain
knowledge that at core, you are God's image and only feel, incorrectly,
that you are a piece of crap. The hidden belief in the lie of our
worthlessness is our one and only real enemy. Have yourself a nice funeral
and find yourself reborn. The only thing that dies are illusions.
I find that just because people ask a question doesn't mean they want an
answer.
The answer is so simple that nobody knows it. But it's not only that they
don't know it. There's a reason they don't know it. They don't want to
know it. And they don't want to know they don't want to know. What are
your chances?
Well be careful what you ask for, you just might get it.
We hate ourselves and anybody who loves us must necessarily be a fool. So
we do two things. Come here and get away. Come here and make me feel
good. Get away, your stupid if you're for real.
So what is broken in your head is broken in everybody's head, it's just
that in minor ways we're all unique.
What we do is test people. We throw up roadblocks. We poke people in the
stomach to see if they REALLY love us. We treat people like sh!t to see if
they REALLY love us. We test in such a way as to make sure we get a
guaranteed NO.
The fix is equally simple. Naturally I'm kidding. Knowing what the fix is
is simple. Doing the actual fixing is something else again. You need to
love yourself and the way, the best way I know to do that other than to
experience Grace which is kind of hard to get on demand, is to get into
some kind of therapeutic setting where you can explore the truth of what
you feel, i.e. learn how to feel, and trace what you will discover, how
much you hate yourself, back to where you acquired those feelings. Then
you will see that they are complete lies, there isn't, and never was,
anything wrong with you. Then you can cast off the smug self protective
armor of egotism that protects you from consciousness of false feelings of
inferiority and expose yourself to the risk of loving. But with the ego
already dead, it won't be bad. You will already have nothing to lose and
everything to give.
Probably few, but who cares? If you can't take the heat, stay out of the kitchen.How many of us would silently accept the name-calling (and name mangling) abuse that Moonbeam undergoes constantly?
Originally posted by: PSYWVic
Originally posted by: Kiyup
Well, all his posts say this with different wording:
"Love yourself and the world will have no problems"
Actually no.
Moonbeam's philosophy is typical of most pseudo-ultra liberal socialists. It is "You will give to those whom we decide are needy whether you want to or not." Of course, he deliberately frames it in a lot of flowery prose, big words, and psychobabble, so most people don't get it. Funny thing is, I don't think he gets it either. He thinks that needy people should be helped (which is admirable), and that the government should be the entity doing the helping (which is not but he can't seem to envision a world in which people help others without government enforcement), and so becomes very charitable with other people's money (via taxes) without realizing it.
No disrespect intended. It's just that his utopia is my Orwellian nightmare.
