Originally posted by: Insomniak
I didn't think much of Call of Duty either - After Battlefield 1942, other world war 2 games have no purpose existing.
Originally posted by: Acanthus
Originally posted by: Insomniak
Played the demo. Nothing special.
NEXT!
Originally posted by: PCTweaker5
Originally posted by: Insomniak
I didn't think much of Call of Duty either - After Battlefield 1942, other world war 2 games have no purpose existing.
BF 1942 sux ass! I shouldnt have bought it, I find it near impossible to fly them damn planes and the key binding is BS when you get those errors about that key being in use already. I will not buy BFVietnam or even DL the demo. Even the COD demo kicked the full version of BF1942's ass as far as fun goes.
Originally posted by: Insomniak
Played the demo. Nothing special.
NEXT!
Originally posted by: PCTweaker5
Originally posted by: Insomniak
I didn't think much of Call of Duty either - After Battlefield 1942, other world war 2 games have no purpose existing.
BF 1942 sux ass! I shouldnt have bought it, I find it near impossible to fly them damn planes and the key binding is BS when you get those errors about that key being in use already. I will not buy BFVietnam or even DL the demo. Even the COD demo kicked the full version of BF1942's ass as far as fun goes.
I agree 100%! I'm glad everyone hasn't fallen into the sheep mentality. BF1942 blows!Originally posted by: PCTweaker5
Originally posted by: Insomniak
I didn't think much of Call of Duty either - After Battlefield 1942, other world war 2 games have no purpose existing.
BF 1942 sux ass! I shouldnt have bought it, I find it near impossible to fly them damn planes and the key binding is BS when you get those errors about that key being in use already. I will not buy BFVietnam or even DL the demo. Even the COD demo kicked the full version of BF1942's ass as far as fun goes.
Originally posted by: Insomniak
Played the demo. Nothing special.
NEXT!
Originally posted by: xSauronx
Originally posted by: Insomniak
Played the demo. Nothing special.
NEXT!
i agree, pretty game, nice physics, lousy ai, nothing extraordinary.
Sorry but in my opinion you guys need some glasses. Far Cry looks awesome - maybe as good as HL2 and better than what I've seen of D3 (yawn, more dark enclosed areas).Originally posted by: Schadenfroh
Originally posted by: Insomniak
Played the demo. Nothing special.
NEXT!
Originally posted by: Robor
Sorry but in my opinion you guys need some glasses. Far Cry looks awesome - maybe as good as HL2 and better than what I've seen of D3 (yawn, more dark enclosed areas).Originally posted by: Schadenfroh
Originally posted by: Insomniak
Played the demo. Nothing special.
NEXT!
Originally posted by: VIAN
FarCry doesn't look too interesting. The graphics are ok, nothing really interesting except for extremely high res textures. Performance is terrible and the polygon popping is annoying. Nothing is really learned from the demo that would make me want to buy the game.
Originally posted by: grabadude
You played a demo. The AI and the whole code was optimised even more after the release of the demo.
Nothing extraordinary!? What did you expect?
I'll admit that UT2004 does look and play pretty awesome but to compare it to Far Cry is a bit of a stretch. I think they are totally different games. UT2004 is online multiplayer while Far Cry is going to have multiplayer and single player as well. I'm looking forward to both of them but if they came out on the same day I'd get Far Cry first.Originally posted by: Insomniak
The purpose of a DEMO is to DEMOnstrate what is so great about a given game so people will buy it. If Crytek put out a demo that makes their game look mediocre and old hat in the gameplay department, then it's their own damn fault, and they shouldn't be the least bit surprised that I think it's a distinctly "average" game and won't be buying it.
You want to see a demo done right, look at UT2004. That demo shows, plainly and clearly, why that game is going to kick unholy amounts of ass. The fact that I only played a demo means nothing - it's the company's responsibility to convince me that their product is worth my time, not mine to investigate it. If you can't gauge a game from the demo, then the demo shouldn't even be put out.
Oh look...this argument just imploded.