To all of those who think Christopher REEVE was a hero.

Brutuskend

Lifer
Apr 2, 2001
26,558
4
0
Does anyone know if he left a large sum of money to spinal cord research in his will?

If he did, I will say he was unselfish.

If not, I still say he was only doing it for his own benefit.

To me, a Hero is someone who risks life and limb for others with no thought for personal safety or accolade's.

I'm not saying he didn't do some good, I'm only saying he was NOT heroic IMO.
 

FFactory0x

Diamond Member
Aug 8, 2001
6,991
0
0
quote:

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Originally posted by: MercenaryForHire
It's spelled REEVES damn it. And at least link to the Maddox article.

- M4H
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------




ITS ACTUALLY SPELLED REEVE DAMN IT
 

NFS4

No Lifer
Oct 9, 1999
72,636
47
91
Originally posted by: MercenaryForHire
It's spelled REEVES damn it. And at least link to the Maddox article. :D

- M4H

It's spelled Reeve you dumbass;)
 

Bumrush99

Diamond Member
Jun 14, 2004
3,334
194
106
Originally posted by: Brutuskend
Does anyone know if he left a large sum of money to spinal cord research in his will?

If he did, I will say he was unselfish.

If not, I still say he was only doing it for his own benefit.

To me, a Hero is someone who risks life and limb for others with no thought for personal safety or accolade's.

I'm not saying he didn't do some good, I'm only saying he was NOT heroic IMO.

Wrong. He raised money for spinal cord research. He went in front of Congress and lobbied for more funding. He could have rotted away, his situation was miserable and unbearable yet he continued to lobby and raise cash. Obviously his motivations were selfish, but you can not judge him by how much he left the cause in death, he needs to take care of his surviving family and has raised more for the cause than anyone in history.
 

Ilmater

Diamond Member
Jun 13, 2002
7,516
1
0
It's his family. He left his money to his family because that's what you do when you die, no matter how rich you are. He then allows his family to distribute his money as he sees fit.

The Maddox article pretty much lays out the case against him, and even with Maddox's sarcasm, he's dead on.
 

Brutuskend

Lifer
Apr 2, 2001
26,558
4
0
Originally posted by: Bumrush99
Originally posted by: Brutuskend
Does anyone know if he left a large sum of money to spinal cord research in his will?

If he did, I will say he was unselfish.

If not, I still say he was only doing it for his own benefit.

To me, a Hero is someone who risks life and limb for others with no thought for personal safety or accolade's.

I'm not saying he didn't do some good, I'm only saying he was NOT heroic IMO.

Wrong. He raised money for spinal cord research. He went in front of Congress and lobbied for more funding. He could have rotted away, his situation was miserable and unbearable yet he continued to lobby and raise cash. Obviously his motivations were selfish, but you can not judge him by how much he left the cause in death, he needs to take care of his surviving family and has raised more for the cause than anyone in history.

That may all be true. But it DOESN'T make him a hero. Just someone who wanted to walk again. Not that that's a bad thing.
 

ggnl

Diamond Member
Jul 2, 2004
5,095
1
0
Originally posted by: Pliablemoose
Having absolutely no clue about much of anything, I find the timing of his death interesting...
His death was politically motivated to help the Democratic party! Have you no shame Mr. Reeve?
 

Shelly21

Diamond Member
May 28, 2002
4,111
1
0
Originally posted by: Pliablemoose
Having absolutely no clue about much of anything, I find the timing of his death interesting...

Do you think he killed himself like that other guy who played superman?
 

Hammer

Lifer
Oct 19, 2001
13,217
1
81
he created a foundation so i assume he had to of left at least part of his money to it.