mmntech
Lifer
- Sep 20, 2007
- 17,501
- 12
- 0
Well, they once thought frigid mothers and watching too much cable TV caused autism. Those have since been thoroughly debunked, same with the vaccine thing.
The truth is we don't really know what causes autism but the prevailing theory is it's a genetic defect. What we can do is eliminate causes by using facts and large "n" studies. The other problem with autism too is it has come to encompass a much broader definition over the years. Especially since Aspergers was categorized as autism spectrum in the DSM-V last year.
Assuming autism is genetic, it's going to manifest itself pretty early on. Giving a baby a MMR shot isn't going to rewrite their DNA. Real life doesn't work on the same principles of the Bioshock universe. You simply can't catch autism like you do a cold. That's not to say that other environmental factors couldn't be causing the defect. But I would think those would have to manifest themselves at conception.
The anti-vac movement though is part of a much broader problem in western society. A lot of people are scientifically illiterate. It's like some sort of voodoo to a big chunk of the population. I don't know what that's from. Maybe they're just not teaching it correctly in schools, or it's a cultural thing. Some scientists do lie and make stuff up for money or recognition. The autism/vaccine thing is a very notable example. However, it's hard to ignore what thousands of doctors and real hard facts show.
The fact that you can wake up and reasonably assume that you'll find your baby alive in their crib is a testament to the power of vaccines and other health advances made over the last century. My parents had cousins that died in childhood over diseases that can be prevented today with vaccines. That was only 50-60 years ago. They would have been alive today had that stuff been available. According to the CDC, the infant mortality rate in the US declined 93% between 1915 and 1997. Or in other words, 100 years ago you had a 1 in 10 chance of your baby dying. Now it's 6 in 1000.
The truth is we don't really know what causes autism but the prevailing theory is it's a genetic defect. What we can do is eliminate causes by using facts and large "n" studies. The other problem with autism too is it has come to encompass a much broader definition over the years. Especially since Aspergers was categorized as autism spectrum in the DSM-V last year.
Assuming autism is genetic, it's going to manifest itself pretty early on. Giving a baby a MMR shot isn't going to rewrite their DNA. Real life doesn't work on the same principles of the Bioshock universe. You simply can't catch autism like you do a cold. That's not to say that other environmental factors couldn't be causing the defect. But I would think those would have to manifest themselves at conception.
The anti-vac movement though is part of a much broader problem in western society. A lot of people are scientifically illiterate. It's like some sort of voodoo to a big chunk of the population. I don't know what that's from. Maybe they're just not teaching it correctly in schools, or it's a cultural thing. Some scientists do lie and make stuff up for money or recognition. The autism/vaccine thing is a very notable example. However, it's hard to ignore what thousands of doctors and real hard facts show.
The fact that you can wake up and reasonably assume that you'll find your baby alive in their crib is a testament to the power of vaccines and other health advances made over the last century. My parents had cousins that died in childhood over diseases that can be prevented today with vaccines. That was only 50-60 years ago. They would have been alive today had that stuff been available. According to the CDC, the infant mortality rate in the US declined 93% between 1915 and 1997. Or in other words, 100 years ago you had a 1 in 10 chance of your baby dying. Now it's 6 in 1000.
