pcgeek11
Lifer
- Jun 12, 2005
- 22,329
- 4,971
- 136
Maybe because Faux News was running a couple of months campaign whining about not getting video of his dui stop.
So this is about his DUI Stop?
Maybe because Faux News was running a couple of months campaign whining about not getting video of his dui stop.
Nothing stolen, no crazy rambling, no drugs found.
Just a MAGAt doing MAGAt stuff.
No, about how the elite libs can hide their dui stop from the enquiring minds at Faux, who’s only interest in showing it is for historical values.So this is about his DUI Stop?
Well...he's kind of right. At this time, there's no confirmed motive...and crime is rampant in SF. It was bad 20 years ago when I worked in the Bay area...from what I read and hear, it's gotten MUCH worse.
(however, like most here, I suspect it this was a politically motivated attack, not some random thing)
No, about how the elite libs can hide their dui stop from the enquiring minds.
I’m keeping quiet like I do on all these attacks.Glad your crystal ball is working. Maybe you should call the San Francisco Police and fill them in with the details of your vast knowledge.
Define MAGAt.
The police report was done the day prior to Rubio's tweet -- the details are in the report and you can visit Rubio's tweet feed to verify the timeline. He got reamed by animals and then actual, real animals simply for being Republican. Read the report, it's all there in that link I shared.The Rubio "canvasser" story still has something to it. He is a known white supremacist and didn't tell police the beating was politically related until after the initial tweets from Rubio indicated it was. I'm guessing someone objected to his actions and that's why he caught the beat down.
Hard to compare that to what happened in the home of a super high profile politician with a hammer.
I’m keeping quiet like I do on all these attacks.
This one does appear mighty suspicious and likely a right wing media follower. However I could be wrong.
Who knows, this is my last post until more facts.I would think anyone attacking for political reasons would attack the politician instead of her husband.
They could be a right winger, but I wouldn't assume that based on the scant facts we have so far. Even if he were a conservative or Republican, that doesn't mean that is the reason behind the attack.
I guess we will find out hopefully the facts soon enough.
Lol being reported guy was screaming “WHERE IS NANCY. WHERE IS NANCY!!!” Yup just a burglary
Hmmm, just a couple of minutes ago you claimed you don’t watch Fox.This part is true. If he were anyone else they would have released it the same day.
The only reason there were any repercussions (as minor as they were) at all is because Fox News didn't allow it to be swept under the rug.
Watching TVGot a link for that. I haven't found anything that supports that.
Hmmm, just a couple of minutes ago you claimed you don’t watch Fox.
Gee, that’s similar to what trump said at his rally in Texas, did you get it there or from the Fox parrots?
I didn't watch any rally in Texas nor did I see anything about it on Fox...
Swing and a miss...
The link in the original post, second paragraph. Third sentence in the article.Got a link for that. I haven't found anything that supports that.
Why is it the assumption that this POS was politically motivated at all?
Maybe they (politicians) need to fix the crime problem, mental illness problem, drug problem and the homeless problem in San Francisco.
The link in the original post, second paragraph. Third sentence in the article.
So you’re sticking with pure coincidence...okayNo I didn't. I said I didn't see anything about Trumps Rally that you brought up.
You said this:
And in response I said this:
I quoted the conversation because I am Evil and not to be trusted.
![]()
So you’re sticking with pure coincidence...okay![]()
Yes, I do. And I still believe it wasn’t a coincidence. You are aware that trump stole MAGA from Reagan right?The facts are the facts. What can I say? I have no reason to lie about it.
Take it or leave it as you want.
So you won't acknowledge that you were wrong about saying that I stated I don't watch Fox?