Racists trot this out when they prefer spending gubmint welfare on whites only.
Good to know how important this is to you.
Are you going to answer the question, or not?
I suspect you're dodging it, for a reason.
Racists trot this out when they prefer spending gubmint welfare on whites only.
Good to know how important this is to you.
Are you going to answer the question, or not?
I suspect you're dodging it, for a reason.
Still dodging...
Are you going to answer the question, or not?
I suspect you're dodging it, for a reason.
I don't have any idea really what you're talking about other than you think he's someone else. For me personally, he's a newcomer that does little else than troll, while insulting and throw out the race card, while using racist remarks all the time. I don't think anyone uses race as much. So many posts in one day? Geez. All while hiding behind a name with zero context of who he (or she) is. Context adds to credibility of an argument. Picture thread readily available, but like most, declines to add anything. Hiding and insulting. One of the worst members we have now, and why I choose to ignore their posts all together. He and kazukian both spam the forums in a negative way more than anyone else.
I don't have any idea really what you're talking about other than you think he's someone else. snip
I (Caucasian kid on welfare at the time) went to a Magnet program in an inner city HS that was about 1% white. snip
The mods (or at least, a mod) says he/she/it isn't an Alt trolling, but obviously enough random people asked about it for it to be made a statement he/she/it isn't. Whether we can trust the mod and/or the mod would have the capability to know is another story...but officially, he/she/it is legit.
Personally, and this would be my personal plea to you guys - please don't advocate for banning. These forums are for our entertainment (else why would we be here), and there just aren't a lot of "newcomers" around. Who do we have that provides LULZ entertainment with consistent frequency? Moonie, but he/she can't carry all the load. Jhhnnnn, Yes, but his schtick is consistent so it gets stale. Nickie, but again, it gets stale unless you're like me and appreciate Nicking. Why had JKWhiteGuilter back in the '17 year old racist thug gets shot' days but unfortunately he's gone (a pity, he actually was brave enough to express the White Guilter derangement inside Lefty mentality, it was refreshing). So who else do we have? Like it or not, 'Yeah I like apples' fills a role here and that role is providing enough entertainment it makes this forum worth reading for at minimum some laughs. If you guys get him/her/it banned/vacationed, what are we going to do then?
The mods (or at least, a mod) says he/she/it isn't an Alt trolling, but obviously enough random people asked about it for it to be made a statement he/she/it isn't. Whether we can trust the mod and/or the mod would have the capability to know is another story...but officially, he/she/it is legit.
This is pretty good example of how the conservative mind works. If enough of them believe in something no matter how dumb and/or unsubstantiated, it must be true.
But in all fairness this is how humans thought before some of the smarter ones figured out reasoning/empiricism.
My general belief is that in terms of life success personal responsibility and other terms like it are a minor minor factor. It doesn't even come into play until so many other things have to go right.True beyond a shadow of a doubt.
The professional welfare milkers applaud you sir.
I think your categorization of this cognitive error as being attached to conservativism is misplaced. But I don't intend to create an equivalency, either. It is an approach which has infested the Republican leadership especially recently, and extends at least to vocal conservatives (I am not intending to imply directionality in origin; I haven't put much effort to pondering that).
Unfortunately, this deficit emboldens Democrats to be overconfident in their own distortions.
I think we are all just people, and the result of being attacked for our beliefs and reasoning largely pushes us to seek comfort in the arms of those who we identify with instead of opening ourselves up to the faults in our assessments.
I imagine if we interacted with each other and grouped together with a different topic than politics, we'd find commonality that betrays our party affiliations. What we see in ourselves and others need not be so inflexible. It's killing us.
Learning is a personal activity not a group activity where all members contribute to the success of the group. A person must decide the level of effort they want to exert to achieve learning and that requires personal responsibility in the effort. If you fail to learn then you did not apply yourself enough and that lies solely upon your individual shoulders. If my neighbor enrolls in a class and barely passes I am not responsible for their low achievement. If I enroll in the same class and achieve an A it was because I took personal responsibility in my learning which educators refer to as self efficacy. High self efficacy is required to learn any material and will promote the transfer of learning at a greater rate than someone who uses Cliff Notes and then can't do better than a D.My general belief is that in terms of life success personal responsibility and other terms like it are a minor minor factor. It doesn't even come into play until so many other things have to go right.
In a game of basketball I can play really really hard and can have extreme levels of drive. I can be tough as nails and can wake up every day at 430 am to train. However I won't win the game if the team I'm playing against gets a 100 point lead to begin with and also get to use jetpacks. That is our current system of education, employment, health care, and general mechanism of upward social drift. .
This is pretty good example of how the conservative mind works. If enough of them believe in something no matter how dumb and/or unsubstantiated, it must be true.
But in all fairness this is how humans thought before some of the smarter ones figured out reasoning/empiricism.
First, categorizing X as an instance of Y doesn't implies it's the only instance of Y.
Second, when a group largely speaks to white identity by their contrasting categorization of this and that minority, it's hardly unfair to take them at their intent. I'm sure some have had a reasonable upbringing rooted in moral ethnics, but you wouldn't know it from how a surprising proportion choose to behave. Now you might argue this isn't a representative vocal minority, but consider that a moral group would condemn individuals which cast a poor light on the rest, and how often we see the white country types supported instead.
Didn't you apply the same distortion to conservatives as you accuse conservatives of applying to race?
I agree that the latter distortion is more reprehensible. Don't throw false equivalency defense at me.
Learning is a personal activity not a group activity where all members contribute to the success of the group. A person must decide the level of effort they want to exert to achieve learning and that requires personal responsibility in the effort. If you fail to learn then you did not apply yourself enough and that lies solely upon your individual shoulders. If my neighbor enrolls in a class and barely passes I am not responsible for their low achievement. If I enroll in the same class and achieve an A it was because I took personal responsibility in my learning which educators refer to as self efficacy. High self efficacy is required to learn any material and will promote the transfer of learning at a greater rate than someone who uses Cliff Notes and then can't do better than a D.
If a school wishes to separate itself because they wish to preserve the integrity of their academic programs this is not racist it is academic protectionism. If my children were enrolled in a school that had a track record of superior academic performance I would not want the school to lower its standards to those of lesser performing schools which only encourages mediocrity.
Lets just get right down to it. Most companies require a specific level of self efficacy in order for them to invest in your professional development so they don't waste their time and money on poor performing employees. The norm is a 3.0 GPA or higher and if you cannot achieve this level of performance I wouldn't want to work with you either.
The perils of racism don't stem from generalization per se, however correct or not; they're instead the rationalizations for otherwise motivated behavior.
Eg. people don't discriminate against blacks because some are welfare queens, they do it since it's beneficial to be higher on the social totem; the welfare queen or whatever is simply how they justify it.
Well you can believe that if you want to.Also in terms of learning, by the time you're in 11th grade you've already had 17 years of education.
I gathered that much, just didn't know who he thought this guy was/is. snip
Also in terms of learning, by the time you're in 11th grade you've already had 17 years of education. That education compounds on itself. How many of these bad kids in high school tell you "actually I went to like the best kindergarten and elementary schools in town when I was 7 and was participating in rocket clubs, and soccer leagues, and etc and when I hit high school that's when it all fell apart and I suddenly started getting bad grades"
THAT is my son. A solid B student his entire life and now he is in high school with nothing but D's and possibly F's this year. Loves school but does not give a flying fuck about his grades. He has a wonderful future of waiting tables ahead of him...
Do you live in some almost all black area or something?
