xxxxxJohnGaltxxxxx
Banned
- Jan 12, 2003
- 3,498
- 0
- 0
Originally posted by: alchemize
Hey, SOMEBODY has to employ all those laid off double-master degree engineers and programmers, middle managers, phd's, etc.
And SOMEBODY has to keep china afloat by selling to our newly formed masses of barely above the poverty level underclass.
Right?
Originally posted by: Pepsei
Originally posted by: alchemize
Hey, SOMEBODY has to employ all those laid off double-master degree engineers and programmers, middle managers, phd's, etc.
And SOMEBODY has to keep china afloat by selling to our newly formed masses of barely above the poverty level underclass.
Right?
Yes, the one stop shop for Chinese products. I really hate those ricers.
But, Wal Mart is good, so I don't have to deal with trash and poor people when I got shopping next door at Sams club.
Originally posted by: Pepsei
Originally posted by: alchemize
Hey, SOMEBODY has to employ all those laid off double-master degree engineers and programmers, middle managers, phd's, etc.
And SOMEBODY has to keep china afloat by selling to our newly formed masses of barely above the poverty level underclass.
Right?
Yes, the one stop shop for Chinese products. I really hate those ricers.
But, Wal Mart is good, so I don't have to deal with trash and poor people when I got shopping next door at Sams club.
Originally posted by: alchemize
Hey, SOMEBODY has to employ all those laid off double-master degree engineers and programmers, middle managers, phd's, etc.
And SOMEBODY has to keep china afloat by selling to our newly formed masses of barely above the poverty level underclass.
Right?
Originally posted by: dirtboy
Walmart allows a person to buy something for less than they currently are. When that happens, a person has extra money. That extra money will get spent on other things. Those other things will create jobs. Walmart is not all that bad.
Originally posted by: maluckey
Heres something that nobody has mentioned. Sure Wal-Mart gives us what we want at a good price, BUUUUUUUT.......did you ever notice that the almost always build outside of city limits, or get special tax-free xoning to develop a swamp, or an unwanted parcel of land? It's no mistake. They are famous for doing this to reduce their tax burden. It does not add to the towns tax base because of the location, or arrangement, and kills businesses that do pay taxes, and decentralizes most any small town it enters.
In Jacksonville, AR, they (Wal-Mart) closed up shop on one side of the road, and built a new store on the other side of the highway on an unwanted property. This killed most all the business on the other side that had grown alongside of Wal-Mart, and moved the center of commerce another 1/4 the opposite way from downtown. It also lowered Wal-Marts tax burden enough to pay for the new building. Great planning and execution! Kill the competition, and lower your property taxes while incresing profit.
I understand that Wal-Mart is out to make a buck. That's what businesses do. I understand that they want to drive away competition as it's the natural order of commercialism. What I don't get is why people let them do what they want, then complain about it later. Just take a look a Germany to see how it should be done. They allowed Wal-Mart to come in, and Wal-Mart planned on opening around 50 stores. The Germans evaluated the locations that the mega chain wanted, and concluded that in many cases, it wouldn't be good for the local businesses or the character of the towns themselves, and that by giving Wal-Mart tax breaks, they would be unfairly promoting one business over another. As a result, Wal-Mark withdrew most of the store locations for the stores, and is now planning on less than half of the original number of stores.
Originally posted by: charrison
Originally posted by: nutxo
Originally posted by: charrison
Originally posted by: Jhhnn
"If you will go back and read it again you will see that the question that I answered was "Does Wal-Mart pay better than the mom and pop stores that they replace?"
I stand by my answer. It's obvious that Wal-Mart employees do not make what their organized counterparts make but that wasn't the question."
Fair enough, but you've yet to offer any substantiation, merely assertion...
The unionized grocery workers in california are making several dollars more an hour than walmart workers. Unionized checkers are making like $15/hour, which is crazy for unskilled labor.
hehe, unskilled? I would bet that you could'nt do that job.
I have yet to find a job I could not do.
Originally posted by: rudder
In order for walmart to offer those low prices they put hard demands on suppliers. This forces suppliers to either cut wages or to move production where it is cheaper. Now the person who can get the stuff for less at walmart has to buy it with their unemployment checks.
An excellent argument for prostitution and drugs gambling and criminal activity of all kinds. The Devil will surely agree.Originally posted by: dirtboy
Originally posted by: rudder
In order for walmart to offer those low prices they put hard demands on suppliers. This forces suppliers to either cut wages or to move production where it is cheaper. Now the person who can get the stuff for less at walmart has to buy it with their unemployment checks.
A supplier chooses to sell to Walmart. Sometimes that is a good decision, often it is a bad one. You can make the finest arguement for how Walmart is, but the bottom line is this: people willingly shop there enmass, people willingly work there for low wages and suppliers willingly sell their product to Walmart.
If it was so bad and people didn't want them....they wouldn't exist.
Especially homosexuality, interracial marriage, and labor collusion.Originally posted by: Moonbeam
An excellent argument for prostitution and drugs gambling and criminal activity of all kinds. The Devil will surely agree.
Originally posted by: dmcowen674
You mean in Germany they (Politicians) are actually looking out for the "overall" good of the Country Economy and the people and NOT looking out for Wal-Mart? Shocking, apparently Wal-mart didn't pay the Politicians off enough.
Originally posted by: xxxxxJohnGaltxxxxx
Originally posted by: dmcowen674
You mean in Germany they (Politicians) are actually looking out for the "overall" good of the Country Economy and the people and NOT looking out for Wal-Mart? Shocking, apparently Wal-mart didn't pay the Politicians off enough.
They sure are...10% of Germans unemployed and probably would love to work at Wal-Mart for some Euros. Ask some of these Germans what they think about these so-called politicians "looking out for the overall."
Originally posted by: djNickb
Originally posted by: charrison
Originally posted by: nutxo
Originally posted by: charrison
Originally posted by: Jhhnn
"If you will go back and read it again you will see that the question that I answered was "Does Wal-Mart pay better than the mom and pop stores that they replace?"
I stand by my answer. It's obvious that Wal-Mart employees do not make what their organized counterparts make but that wasn't the question."
Fair enough, but you've yet to offer any substantiation, merely assertion...
The unionized grocery workers in california are making several dollars more an hour than walmart workers. Unionized checkers are making like $15/hour, which is crazy for unskilled labor.
hehe, unskilled? I would bet that you could'nt do that job.
I have yet to find a job I could not do.
Which part of the job is skilled? Not putting your bread in the bottom of the bag or not forgetting to bag some of your items. Monkeys could do these jobs.
Originally posted by: LunarRay
Originally posted by: nickPOWERZ
Originally posted by: LunarRay
So long as ALL goods and services consumed in the US are priced in relation to the Walmart price structure and ALL folks have their wages reduced accordingly and if it is contained within the borders of the US until there is a zero trade deficit.. then fine..
But, to maintain historic standard of living relationships all professions, crafts and labor must be reevaluated to the lowest common denominator. Housing prices and commodities and everything must be price reduced to accommodate this world wide capitalism.. negative inflation... or disinflation... this is what will equalize us with Chad and Ethiopia!
So are you saying that when CPU manufacturers create a CPU to be faster and less expensive that we all must suffer reduced wages?
There is hardly a correlation between the two.. I'm not sure how you can compare what I said to what you said.. but, to be clear.. Notwithstanding what ever the CPU folks do, their wage should be adjusted downward and the price of CPU's adjusted downward as well so the Walmart Ee can buy it still and if you can reduce the price via technology to maintain your market, fine.. the point is that there is a relationship between what each job use to be paid (with in reason and by local) if you folks can see fit to reduce the wage of the cashier for no other reason than you can.. then I think. fine! All wages should be reduced to be equalized with the lowest common denominator.. We can start over with 1950 wage structures... but let us all start over.. not just a few. Or if you prefer.. then let us start with the wage of the Chadian.. I don't really care so long as there is no benefit derived by the Walmartization of a class of worker.. the concept is to never reduce the value of a job.. build upon it.. create jobs that meet the essential needs of the population.. a living wage.. for 'adult' workers.
Originally posted by: tnitsuj
Originally posted by: xxxxxJohnGaltxxxxx
Originally posted by: dmcowen674
You mean in Germany they (Politicians) are actually looking out for the "overall" good of the Country Economy and the people and NOT looking out for Wal-Mart? Shocking, apparently Wal-mart didn't pay the Politicians off enough.
They sure are...10% of Germans unemployed and probably would love to work at Wal-Mart for some Euros. Ask some of these Germans what they think about these so-called politicians "looking out for the overall."
10% unemployment in Germany is measured differently than 10% would in the US. They measure all eligible workers/we don't.
Originally posted by: rjain
You know what's amazing? The fact that so many people claim to support the American Dream but hate its results.
