The Ultimate Wal Mart Thread; Is Wal Mart good for America

Page 3 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.

Pepsei

Lifer
Dec 14, 2001
12,895
1
0
Originally posted by: alchemize
Hey, SOMEBODY has to employ all those laid off double-master degree engineers and programmers, middle managers, phd's, etc.

And SOMEBODY has to keep china afloat by selling to our newly formed masses of barely above the poverty level underclass.

Right?

Yes, the one stop shop for Chinese products. I really hate those ricers.

But, Wal Mart is good, so I don't have to deal with trash and poor people when I got shopping next door at Sams club.
 

BDawg

Lifer
Oct 31, 2000
11,631
2
0
Originally posted by: Pepsei
Originally posted by: alchemize
Hey, SOMEBODY has to employ all those laid off double-master degree engineers and programmers, middle managers, phd's, etc.

And SOMEBODY has to keep china afloat by selling to our newly formed masses of barely above the poverty level underclass.

Right?

Yes, the one stop shop for Chinese products. I really hate those ricers.

But, Wal Mart is good, so I don't have to deal with trash and poor people when I got shopping next door at Sams club.

Costco is far nicer than Sam's Club. Sam's is Wal-Mart in bulk.
 

BDawg

Lifer
Oct 31, 2000
11,631
2
0
Originally posted by: Pepsei
Originally posted by: alchemize
Hey, SOMEBODY has to employ all those laid off double-master degree engineers and programmers, middle managers, phd's, etc.

And SOMEBODY has to keep china afloat by selling to our newly formed masses of barely above the poverty level underclass.

Right?

Yes, the one stop shop for Chinese products. I really hate those ricers.

But, Wal Mart is good, so I don't have to deal with trash and poor people when I got shopping next door at Sams club.

Costco is far nicer than Sam's Club. Sam's is Wal-Mart in bulk.
 

dmcowen674

No Lifer
Oct 13, 1999
54,889
47
91
www.alienbabeltech.com
Originally posted by: alchemize
Hey, SOMEBODY has to employ all those laid off double-master degree engineers and programmers, middle managers, phd's, etc.

And SOMEBODY has to keep china afloat by selling to our newly formed masses of barely above the poverty level underclass.

Right?

Yep, also their Wages have gone UP from working as Experts in their fields through years of schooling and experience to stocking the isles at Wal-Mart too. Woot!

 

maluckey

Platinum Member
Jan 31, 2003
2,933
0
71
Heres something that nobody has mentioned. Sure Wal-Mart gives us what we want at a good price, BUUUUUUUT.......did you ever notice that the almost always build outside of city limits, or get special tax-free xoning to develop a swamp, or an unwanted parcel of land? It's no mistake. They are famous for doing this to reduce their tax burden. It does not add to the towns tax base because of the location, or arrangement, and kills businesses that do pay taxes, and decentralizes most any small town it enters.

In Jacksonville, AR, they (Wal-Mart) closed up shop on one side of the road, and built a new store on the other side of the highway on an unwanted property. This killed most all the business on the other side that had grown alongside of Wal-Mart, and moved the center of commerce another 1/4 the opposite way from downtown. It also lowered Wal-Marts tax burden enough to pay for the new building. Great planning and execution! Kill the competition, and lower your property taxes while incresing profit.

I understand that Wal-Mart is out to make a buck. That's what businesses do. I understand that they want to drive away competition as it's the natural order of commercialism. What I don't get is why people let them do what they want, then complain about it later. Just take a look a Germany to see how it should be done. They allowed Wal-Mart to come in, and Wal-Mart planned on opening around 50 stores. The Germans evaluated the locations that the mega chain wanted, and concluded that in many cases, it wouldn't be good for the local businesses or the character of the towns themselves, and that by giving Wal-Mart tax breaks, they would be unfairly promoting one business over another. As a result, Wal-Mark withdrew most of the store locations for the stores, and is now planning on less than half of the original number of stores.
 

rudder

Lifer
Nov 9, 2000
19,441
86
91
Originally posted by: dirtboy
Walmart allows a person to buy something for less than they currently are. When that happens, a person has extra money. That extra money will get spent on other things. Those other things will create jobs. Walmart is not all that bad.

In order for walmart to offer those low prices they put hard demands on suppliers. This forces suppliers to either cut wages or to move production where it is cheaper. Now the person who can get the stuff for less at walmart has to buy it with their unemployment checks.
 

dmcowen674

No Lifer
Oct 13, 1999
54,889
47
91
www.alienbabeltech.com
Originally posted by: maluckey
Heres something that nobody has mentioned. Sure Wal-Mart gives us what we want at a good price, BUUUUUUUT.......did you ever notice that the almost always build outside of city limits, or get special tax-free xoning to develop a swamp, or an unwanted parcel of land? It's no mistake. They are famous for doing this to reduce their tax burden. It does not add to the towns tax base because of the location, or arrangement, and kills businesses that do pay taxes, and decentralizes most any small town it enters.

In Jacksonville, AR, they (Wal-Mart) closed up shop on one side of the road, and built a new store on the other side of the highway on an unwanted property. This killed most all the business on the other side that had grown alongside of Wal-Mart, and moved the center of commerce another 1/4 the opposite way from downtown. It also lowered Wal-Marts tax burden enough to pay for the new building. Great planning and execution! Kill the competition, and lower your property taxes while incresing profit.

I understand that Wal-Mart is out to make a buck. That's what businesses do. I understand that they want to drive away competition as it's the natural order of commercialism. What I don't get is why people let them do what they want, then complain about it later. Just take a look a Germany to see how it should be done. They allowed Wal-Mart to come in, and Wal-Mart planned on opening around 50 stores. The Germans evaluated the locations that the mega chain wanted, and concluded that in many cases, it wouldn't be good for the local businesses or the character of the towns themselves, and that by giving Wal-Mart tax breaks, they would be unfairly promoting one business over another. As a result, Wal-Mark withdrew most of the store locations for the stores, and is now planning on less than half of the original number of stores.

Good post about local and Germany.

You mean in Germany they (Politicians) are actually looking out for the "overall" good of the Country Economy and the people and NOT looking out for Wal-Mart? Shocking, apparently Wal-mart didn't pay the Politicians off enough.

Speaking of Political payoffs. The guy (Former Fulton County Commissioner Mitch Skandalackis) that was the Leader of the Atlanta area during the Olympic era in the 1990's pleaded guilty to accepting bribes for a Businessman that wanted to win the contract for the Telecommunications infrastructure for Atlanta.

12-16-2003 Skandalakis' Guilty Plea Expected Today
 

djNickb

Senior member
Oct 16, 2003
529
0
0
Originally posted by: charrison
Originally posted by: nutxo
Originally posted by: charrison
Originally posted by: Jhhnn
"If you will go back and read it again you will see that the question that I answered was "Does Wal-Mart pay better than the mom and pop stores that they replace?"

I stand by my answer. It's obvious that Wal-Mart employees do not make what their organized counterparts make but that wasn't the question."

Fair enough, but you've yet to offer any substantiation, merely assertion...



The unionized grocery workers in california are making several dollars more an hour than walmart workers. Unionized checkers are making like $15/hour, which is crazy for unskilled labor.


hehe, unskilled? I would bet that you could'nt do that job.

I have yet to find a job I could not do.

Which part of the job is skilled? Not putting your bread in the bottom of the bag or not forgetting to bag some of your items. Monkeys could do these jobs.

 

xochi

Senior member
Jan 18, 2000
891
6
81

i hate wal-mart because the stores are filthy.

Target is much more orderly
 

Moonbeam

Elite Member
Nov 24, 1999
74,912
6,790
126
I scored 1600 om my SATs and will be entering Harvard Business School. I love Walmat because I plan to own one someday. Walmart may not be good for workers, but it sure will be good for me. People just need to think a bit, prioritize, get educated, get out of larbor and start owning their own companies, and move overseas. The US is finished anyway because Americans only think of themselves instead of what's good for the company.
 

dirtboy

Diamond Member
Oct 9, 1999
6,745
1
81
Originally posted by: rudder
In order for walmart to offer those low prices they put hard demands on suppliers. This forces suppliers to either cut wages or to move production where it is cheaper. Now the person who can get the stuff for less at walmart has to buy it with their unemployment checks.

A supplier chooses to sell to Walmart. Sometimes that is a good decision, often it is a bad one. You can make the finest arguement for how Walmart is, but the bottom line is this: people willingly shop there enmass, people willingly work there for low wages and suppliers willingly sell their product to Walmart.

If it was so bad and people didn't want them....they wouldn't exist.
 

Moonbeam

Elite Member
Nov 24, 1999
74,912
6,790
126
Originally posted by: dirtboy
Originally posted by: rudder
In order for walmart to offer those low prices they put hard demands on suppliers. This forces suppliers to either cut wages or to move production where it is cheaper. Now the person who can get the stuff for less at walmart has to buy it with their unemployment checks.

A supplier chooses to sell to Walmart. Sometimes that is a good decision, often it is a bad one. You can make the finest arguement for how Walmart is, but the bottom line is this: people willingly shop there enmass, people willingly work there for low wages and suppliers willingly sell their product to Walmart.

If it was so bad and people didn't want them....they wouldn't exist.
An excellent argument for prostitution and drugs gambling and criminal activity of all kinds. The Devil will surely agree.

 

Lalakai

Golden Member
Nov 30, 1999
1,634
0
76
Cast my vote: No.

Wal Mart approached our city and requested to build; the issue was so hotly contested that it was actually voted on. Majority of our township said "no". So Wal mart went just across the township line, donated 50k to that township, and got permission. Because we have an agreement for water and sewage issues with that township, our existing treatment plant is at capacity (due to influx from Wal mart). So we are beginning to design expanded treatment plant, something that we hadn't planned on doing for another 5 years. We had been ranked in the top "100 small towns to live in" but i think we've lost that distinction. I will shop local as much as possible but can probably count the times i've been in walmart, on both hands (even with the normal number of fingers on each hand ;) ). I do not like walmart, I will not support walmart, and show it by shopping at the local stores.
 

rjain

Golden Member
May 1, 2003
1,475
0
0
Originally posted by: Moonbeam

An excellent argument for prostitution and drugs gambling and criminal activity of all kinds. The Devil will surely agree.
Especially homosexuality, interracial marriage, and labor collusion.
 

rjain

Golden Member
May 1, 2003
1,475
0
0
You know what's amazing? The fact that so many people claim to support the American Dream but hate its results.
 
Jan 12, 2003
3,498
0
0
Originally posted by: dmcowen674

You mean in Germany they (Politicians) are actually looking out for the "overall" good of the Country Economy and the people and NOT looking out for Wal-Mart? Shocking, apparently Wal-mart didn't pay the Politicians off enough.

They sure are...10% of Germans unemployed and probably would love to work at Wal-Mart for some Euros. Ask some of these Germans what they think about these so-called politicians "looking out for the overall."

 

tnitsuj

Diamond Member
May 22, 2003
5,446
0
76
Originally posted by: xxxxxJohnGaltxxxxx
Originally posted by: dmcowen674

You mean in Germany they (Politicians) are actually looking out for the "overall" good of the Country Economy and the people and NOT looking out for Wal-Mart? Shocking, apparently Wal-mart didn't pay the Politicians off enough.

They sure are...10% of Germans unemployed and probably would love to work at Wal-Mart for some Euros. Ask some of these Germans what they think about these so-called politicians "looking out for the overall."

10% unemployment in Germany is measured differently than 10% would in the US. They measure all eligible workers/we don't.
 

nutxo

Diamond Member
May 20, 2001
6,833
515
126
Originally posted by: djNickb
Originally posted by: charrison
Originally posted by: nutxo
Originally posted by: charrison
Originally posted by: Jhhnn
"If you will go back and read it again you will see that the question that I answered was "Does Wal-Mart pay better than the mom and pop stores that they replace?"

I stand by my answer. It's obvious that Wal-Mart employees do not make what their organized counterparts make but that wasn't the question."

Fair enough, but you've yet to offer any substantiation, merely assertion...



The unionized grocery workers in california are making several dollars more an hour than walmart workers. Unionized checkers are making like $15/hour, which is crazy for unskilled labor.


hehe, unskilled? I would bet that you could'nt do that job.

I have yet to find a job I could not do.

Which part of the job is skilled? Not putting your bread in the bottom of the bag or not forgetting to bag some of your items. Monkeys could do these jobs.


YOUR SO DAMN SMART YOU DONT KNOW THE DIFFERENCE BETWEEN A BAGGER AND A CASHIER? ack, sorry bout the caps.

To say that someone that spends so many hours on their feet each day and puts up with Aholes all day long is worth less than some lazy dumb ass IT that can barely setup a user account or whos ultimate answer to everything is reload is ridiculous.

/rant off
:D
 

Moonbeam

Elite Member
Nov 24, 1999
74,912
6,790
126
The robots will inherit the American dream because they are more efficient. Grocery store wages will drop to zero as machines that eat are phased out. The last human will gasp, "We should have worhiped competition."
 

nickPOWERZ

Member
Jun 7, 2003
54
0
0
Originally posted by: LunarRay
Originally posted by: nickPOWERZ
Originally posted by: LunarRay

So long as ALL goods and services consumed in the US are priced in relation to the Walmart price structure and ALL folks have their wages reduced accordingly and if it is contained within the borders of the US until there is a zero trade deficit.. then fine..
But, to maintain historic standard of living relationships all professions, crafts and labor must be reevaluated to the lowest common denominator. Housing prices and commodities and everything must be price reduced to accommodate this world wide capitalism.. negative inflation... or disinflation... this is what will equalize us with Chad and Ethiopia!

So are you saying that when CPU manufacturers create a CPU to be faster and less expensive that we all must suffer reduced wages?

There is hardly a correlation between the two.. I'm not sure how you can compare what I said to what you said.. but, to be clear.. Notwithstanding what ever the CPU folks do, their wage should be adjusted downward and the price of CPU's adjusted downward as well so the Walmart Ee can buy it still and if you can reduce the price via technology to maintain your market, fine.. the point is that there is a relationship between what each job use to be paid (with in reason and by local) if you folks can see fit to reduce the wage of the cashier for no other reason than you can.. then I think. fine! All wages should be reduced to be equalized with the lowest common denominator.. We can start over with 1950 wage structures... but let us all start over.. not just a few. Or if you prefer.. then let us start with the wage of the Chadian.. I don't really care so long as there is no benefit derived by the Walmartization of a class of worker.. the concept is to never reduce the value of a job.. build upon it.. create jobs that meet the essential needs of the population.. a living wage.. for 'adult' workers.

Aparently we talk about two different things. I like the Walmartization when you are talking about big gigantic super duper stores. More selection, fair prices, and all in one place. The concept has been hugely successful for a reason. It is just like Home Depot, CompUSA, Petsmart, and Costco. I don't think I have ever actually bought something at a Walmart but I go to Home Depot and such all the time.

When you talk about reducing adults wages to places below a solid living wage then I would agree with you, I have no idea what Wal Mart pays its people though. I am not sure what the best practical answer is to deal with low wages. Capitalism works extremely well in high salary areas but it fails to account for human need when you get into the low salary areas. Government intervention, aka minimum wage is a decent idea but you run into all sorts of problems when inflation is considered. Unions are another way to fight the problem. Idealy we would just all be good people and pay those people enough, but yeah right. It all boils down to having that lowest common demoninator of worker work for a decent wage, it's an interesting problem.
 

dmcowen674

No Lifer
Oct 13, 1999
54,889
47
91
www.alienbabeltech.com
Originally posted by: tnitsuj
Originally posted by: xxxxxJohnGaltxxxxx
Originally posted by: dmcowen674

You mean in Germany they (Politicians) are actually looking out for the "overall" good of the Country Economy and the people and NOT looking out for Wal-Mart? Shocking, apparently Wal-mart didn't pay the Politicians off enough.

They sure are...10% of Germans unemployed and probably would love to work at Wal-Mart for some Euros. Ask some of these Germans what they think about these so-called politicians "looking out for the overall."

10% unemployment in Germany is measured differently than 10% would in the US. They measure all eligible workers/we don't.

You tell em Tnitsuj. I bet the "REAL" U.S. number is well over 10%.
 

LunarRay

Diamond Member
Mar 2, 2003
9,993
1
76
Originally posted by: rjain
You know what's amazing? The fact that so many people claim to support the American Dream but hate its results.


The American Dream.. to me is embodied in these words: ". . . We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness. . ."

This means, at least to me, that there are other rights not explicitly stated above but, are such that they derive their reality from the foundational three. The ability to work full time at the level of our capability and from such work derive at least the basic notion of the quoted holdings upon which we sought to provide to all citizens.