Originally posted by: Nietzscheusw
Originally posted by: Moonbeam
Not running would sort of be like admitting you were wrong and there is a difference between Bush and Gore and he personally was directly responsible for the Sepreme Coup's big chance to select a criminal team. That's kind of asking alot of the guy.
Clinton and Gore bombed Iraq for years. Clinton and Gore embargoed Iraq for years.
They may have killed more Iraqis than GWB.
If you compared the platforms of Nader, Gore and GWB, you would have clearly seen that Nader proposed many more deep changes than Gore and GWB. There were far fewer differences between Gore and Bush, than between Nader and Gore.
Same today: Kerry voted for the war, for the Patriot Act, for Nafta,...
Only if Kucinich were the democratic candidate would Nader not run, because Kucinich voted against the war, against the Patriot Act, NAFTA,...
Nader is in because he fights for real changes for the people, and Kerry clearly does not!
Kerry is just a little Bush. Different name, but few real differences: they both favour the powers that be over the people, the banks and multinationals over their clients.
Now the only way to get rid of Bush (or, more broadly, of the candidates of the billionaires: Bush and Kerry) is to vote for Nader.
Just dig it!