I hate it when people accuse me of being a republican.LOL, then I bet you're a horrible person. And a hypocrite, too.
I hate it when people accuse me of being a republican.LOL, then I bet you're a horrible person. And a hypocrite, too.
LOL, nice dodge. So do you really believe in "equality for all?" I doubt it.I hate it when people accuse me of being a republican.
So you won't give reasons for calling a woman a genetic defect, a moron, and a racist, and you won't give a reason for calling me against equality and a horrible person. And all Republicans are hypocrites.I hate it when people accuse me of being a republican.
No, that's not the argument at all. The argument is that if government has a role in recognizing and incentivizing the ideal conditions for society heterosexual marriage represents it should also incentivize the ideal conditions that homosexual marriage also represents. For heterosexuals it's about making the best environment for raising children. For homosexuals it's partly that as well, but mostly about reducing the spread of STDs.Many people who have nothing against gays are opposed to gay marriage. The argument for gay marriage is that people who love each other should be able to get married if they want.
This is often touted by opponents of gay marriage; the "slippery slope" argument. The wheels come off of it, though, when it's considered against the "recognizing and incentivizing ideal conditions" premise I outlined above. Polygamy is not really an "ideal condition" for anything. It shouldn't be banned or restricted in any way, but it's not a condition that has a net-positive impact on society.Question: should Mormon and Muslim Americans be allowed legal polygamy? What about hippie families who want group marriage?
I hope you're not a bigoted polyphobe.
I call.I'll see your
and raise you a
![]()
I raise you one.
![]()
These photos are of empowered americans expressing their patriotism, not a bunch of teabagging right wing nutjobs.![]()
Do they sells these in stores or something and you just paste whatever face you want?![]()
How about there are nutjobs on both sides
Bingo. And a shitload of hypocrisy to boot.![]()
How about there are nutjobs on both sides
Seems like itDo they sells these in stores or something and you just paste whatever face you want?
The Tea Partiers (I don't use a derogatory sexual term like you did to refer to them)I'm trying to figure out which Obama taxes the Tea Baggers are referencing.
If MSNBC had "reported" on this guy instead of the Tea Party people the loony left would have a hard on for months foaming at the mouth about how racism, and Nazi the Tea Party is.Nice try by CsG to claim that some nazi at a teaparty is a liberal though...
when I am taxed to pay for another American's wants, e.g. to own a house he can't afford, to receive health insurance without having to pay for it, etc, then that is indeed slavery.some were bad. taxes=slavery? yeah thats a reach.
some are kinda cleaver.
...and finally finding their voices after a black man was elected and more importantly NOT finding their voices when a rich white man was running the country into the ground which set into motion this 10 years down the line invisible clock you mentioned. Yep, nothing to see out of place here.The Tea Partiers (I don't use a derogatory sexual term like you did to refer to them)
Are not upset with what the tax rate is at this very moment. Unlike many, they're actually looking at the long term prospects for our country and are protesting against that.
Errr... nooo...when I am taxed to pay for another American's wants, e.g. to own a house he can't afford, to receive health insurance without having to pay for it, etc, then that is indeed slavery.
When voting doesn't stop a tyrannical government the 2nd amendment means your "vote" is your weapon used to stop tyranny.As an outsider I don't really get this - is he saying he want to kill Obama, all black people, or just everyone who votes for the other party?
So just Obama then? Gotcha. But isn't it illegal to threaten to kill the President?When voting doesn't stop a tyrannical government the 2nd amendment means your "vote" is your weapon used to stop tyranny.
That picture doesn't have anything whatsoever to do with Obama, and was around LONG before Obama being president was a thought in his head.So just Obama then? Gotcha. But isn't it illegal to threaten to kill the President?
So it _is_ just Democrats in general? I'm just trying to get my head around it. There's not many places in the world where saying 'if you vote for the other party we will kill you all' is considered a normal campaigning strategy. Zimbabwe possibly.That picture doesn't have anything whatsoever to do with Obama, and was around LONG before Obama being president was a thought in his head.
I already explained it to you and it has nothing to do with a party or person.So it _is_ just Democrats in general? I'm just trying to get my head around it. There's not many places in the world where saying 'if you vote for the other party we will kill you all' is considered a normal campaigning strategy. Zimbabwe possibly.
So the vote is not for a party, nor the weapon for a person? Both are kinda pointless then eh?I already explained it to you and it has nothing to do with a party or person.
You're kind of stupid aren't you?So it _is_ just Democrats in general? I'm just trying to get my head around it. There's not many places in the world where saying 'if you vote for the other party we will kill you all' is considered a normal campaigning strategy. Zimbabwe possibly.