Matt1970
Lifer
- Mar 19, 2007
- 12,320
- 3
- 0
What he is saying is that statistics are hard and he does not understand how they work.
Because you would have to apply the same rules to ten times the population and hope for the same outcome.
What he is saying is that statistics are hard and he does not understand how they work.
Why the hell would anyone intelligent, educated, hard working and upwardly mobile want to move here? We've been shunning, practically banning such people from coming here for years. Just look at the so-called immigration debate. We're working feverishly to make our OFFICIAL immigration policy rewarding the least-educated, poorest, least-skilled who cut in line ahead of everyone else. It's not even a system of immigration that idiots are clamoring for here, but flat out illegal immigration being the norm.If I discuss this in the US everyone just brings up 30 year old stereotypes about socialism or spouts that the US is so great because everyone wants to move there. Everyone doesn't want to move there though. Last time I looked I think it was something like 12% of our immigration is from developed nations. More people move to Spain AND Germany than the US. So yeah lots of people from 3rd world countries are coming to the US. No surprise there. I have tried over and over and over again to get some of my European friends to move to the US and they flat out refuse.
Only for 99(.9) percent of the country.
![]()
Where's the corresponding picture of Obama and his cronies laughing about Quantitative Easing trickling down to main street?
I don't think there was ever any argument for that.
Just without quantitative easing "Great Recession" would be more catastrophic or at the very least way worse than it ended up being.
I'll admit they didn't aim very high on that one and its effects are debatable but the promises were nothing like trickle down economics.
Is there some kind of point you are trying to make? What you said means nothing.
I can't argue with any of that. Personally when people ask I just say that the US isn't right for me right now. I personally can't imagine having children in the US. I'll move back when they're older or at least old enough to be in school. Even that is doubtful though since until the University level I am incredibly unimpressed with the US education system. Maybe I can find a good private school.
The thing is that we're not just talking about Sweden. We're talking about multiple countries from Europe to Australia. Yes Spain, Italy, Portugal, and Greece are not doing so well so we should not look to them as a role model. At the same time if there is a great place in the US then we should maybe look to them for national changes. Are there any such places you might recommend?
Don't misunderstand what I'm saying as a Sweden is #1 and USA is in last place either. I love both countries but I find it embarrassing that the USA, the former most amazing place on the planet, is now trailing in almost all categories compared to the rest of the developed world. However I recognize that while Sweden is improving the USA is getting worse and is in denial. The USA can only brag about GDP for so long. It's not that impressive if most of it is going to a very small group of people while the rest of the country is sitting on stagnant wages and higher costs.
The biggest gripe I have with the US right now is that the only place I can even discuss this is places like here. If I discuss this in the US everyone just brings up 30 year old stereotypes about socialism or spouts that the US is so great because everyone wants to move there. Everyone doesn't want to move there though. Last time I looked I think it was something like 12% of our immigration is from developed nations. More people move to Spain AND Germany than the US. So yeah lots of people from 3rd world countries are coming to the US. No surprise there. I have tried over and over and over again to get some of my European friends to move to the US and they flat out refuse. Nobody wants 2 weeks vacation, expensive healthcare, expensive school, and to sit in a car for over an hour per day. Can you blame them? If I try to use statistics there people put their fingers in their ears. Americans have become apathetic. Those at the bottom are hopeless and those at the top could give two shits about the rest of the population. The middle class just shakes their head and has no clue what to do about it.
Is there some kind of point you are trying to make? What you said means nothing.
New York Times article link
Apparently the US is not the greatest nor richest anymore, we lag far behind other countries now.
Americans have become apathetic.
Those at the bottom are hopeless and those at the top could give two shits about the rest of the population.
The middle class just shakes their head and has no clue what to do about it.
That sums up the current state of the United Corporations of America.
Except one correction.
The middle class is shrinking fast becoming a giant bottom.
Once enough that were middle class fall they will band together and start a new Civil War.
There just aren't enough people angry and stupid enough to take up arms out of anger over their share of the pie.
History tells us that it doesn't take much to spark a riot or uprising. The French revolution was due to a few years of bad weather for example. I wonder what would happen if we had an oil crisis again like we did in the 1970's or another dust bowl like we did in the 1930's. What happens in a generation if nobody can afford a home because of 9% interest rates and $500,000 houses combined with huge student loans and high unemployment? I'd like to think that the solution to an armed uprising would be to fix our problems before something that extreme can happen.
The U.S. has over 320,000,000 people! What country of this colossal size has ever achieved so much or given so much to help others. If it weren't for the U.S. helping Europe after WW II with the Marshall Plan it would be like Africa right now! I agree that the rich are getting richer and the poor poorer but I can only think of one other country in this world that offers the hope and dreams that the U.S. does and that is my home country of America, Jnr. (er, I mean, Canada.)
History tells us that it doesn't take much to spark a riot or uprising. The French revolution was due to a few years of bad weather for example. I wonder what would happen if we had an oil crisis again like we did in the 1970's or another dust bowl like we did in the 1930's. What happens in a generation if nobody can afford a home because of 9% interest rates and $500,000 houses combined with huge student loans and high unemployment? I'd like to think that the solution to an armed uprising would be to fix our problems before something that extreme can happen.
You do realize that an armed uprising in a country like ours would absolutely devastate the economy. No matter which side won we would all lose. Regardless of what anyone else tells you houses will always be within our reach. Nobody raises prices beyond anyone's reach if they want to make sales.
I don't want an armed uprising but I can't imagine that's something that we wanted back in the 1770's, the French wanted at the end of the 1800's or the Russians wanted in the beginning of the 1900's. I highly doubt the Arab spring, with all the death and destruction, is what the middle east wanted. It just sparked and happened.
At some point something does need to change. Eventually Americans will catch on that their standard of living has fallen too far behind the rest of the developed world. It's pretty much either that or the rest of the developed world has to come to the same level as the US. Which is it? Are we destined to improve our standard of living or is everyone just going to keep falling? Do you think China, India, and Brazil are aiming to be like the USA or like the rest of the developed world?
So you know this isn't adjusted for price differences either. Americans still have greater purchasing power as items are still less costly here.
If it was going to happen, it would have happened with the occupy movement.
