• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

The Joe Biden sexual assault allegation

Page 88 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.
fskimospy said:
If someone with a history of lying says something and you think they might be lying again then you’re a rape apologist.
Click to expand...

Pointing out inconsistencies of their stories also makes you a rape apologist.

Didn’t you know that the “believe women“ movement means that all women are to be believed without question. Without question Eskimospy!
 
ivwshane said:
Pointing out inconsistencies of their stories also makes you a rape apologist.

Didn’t you know that the “believe women“ movement means that all women are to be believed without question. Without question Eskimospy!
Click to expand...

You haven't been following along very well. I have never accused someone of using Rape Apologist Talking Points for pointing out Story Inconsistencies.
 
sandorski said:
Yes we have, except the Check Fraud allegation. An Employer, singular, accused her of not paying a Bill, as I recall.
Click to expand...
No, her employer accused her of deceptively billing personal animal care to the business, which is theft. She also accused her of being serially dishonest.
 
HomerJS said:
The corroborating evidence exists and is compelling that what happened?

1. Someone at Biden's office harassed her
2. Joe touched her hair and neck
3. Joe fingered her in the halls of the Senate

Because she's claimed all 3 at different times.
Click to expand...
All three of those things can be true. Only one of those things needs to be true. At least one has a high probability of being true.
 
But let’s look at the two other recent political sexual assault allegations. Mueller and Fauci. How convenient both were used to smear someone in effort to help Trumpity Dumpity?

Timing is fishy. Against, when the movement against creepy hair sniffing Biden, why didn’t she come out then? Because her current claims are FALSE!!!!!
 
eelw said:
But let’s look at the two other recent political sexual assault allegations. Mueller and Fauci. How convenient both were used to smear someone in effort to help Trumpity Dumpity?

Timing is fishy. Against, when the movement against creepy hair sniffing Biden, why didn’t she come out then? Because her current claims are FALSE!!!!!
Click to expand...
She did, but when she didn't get the desired attention she changed her story.
 
Starbuck1975 said:
All three of those things can be true. Only one of those things needs to be true. At least one has a high probability of being true.
Click to expand...
So the fact she claimed all to be true and they are all different events, doesn't effect the credibility of...let's...say...

ALL OF THEM?!?
 
Jhhnn said:
So what? Is there some part of *utterly untrustworthy" you don't understand?
Click to expand...
His shtick is to pretend that Democrats were advocating for believing everything a woman said regardless of other circumstances and then concern trolling them based on his made up description of their position.
 
sandorski said:
No, she seems surprised at the allegation and promises to pay.
Click to expand...
Wait, you’re saying she was surprised that she was not allowed to charge personal pet expenses to her employer? Are you fucking kidding me.

Also, according to her employer she never did pay so through deception she stole $1,400 from them. We should totally take her at her word though, haha.
 
fskimospy said:
Wait, you’re saying she was surprised that she was not allowed to charge personal pet expenses to her employer? Are you fucking kidding me.

Also, according to her employer she never did pay so through deception she stole $1,400 from them. We should totally take her at her word though, haha.
Click to expand...

Sure seems like it reading the e-mail.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

TRENDING THREADS

Back
Top