The Joe Biden sexual assault allegation

Page 51 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.

theeedude

Lifer
Feb 5, 2006
35,787
6,198
126
You are reading too much into her Creative Writing works. There are only 2 writings she claims as the Allegation, the one originally written a year ago and the more recently Edited version of such.
She got a creative mind all right, I'll give you that.
Reade said her expulsion from Biden’s office stemmed from an early 1993 staff argument over the suggestion she serve drinks at an event. According to Reade, Biden wanted her to serve because he liked her legs. Reade didn’t hear Biden make that suggestion, instead learning of it through his staff’s argument. Reade opted against serving drinks, a move she believes sidelined her career.
Was it not serving drinks, refusing his aggressive sexual advances, pursuit of arts and writing, moving with her baby daddy to midwest, love of Russia that sidelined her career? She said all those things at different times, but we might never know the truth. Also, if she left to midwest with her abusive baby daddy, was she already pregnant when Biden supposedly abused her? That seems to be missing from the story too because she conveniently doesn't remember when and where it happened.
 

dank69

Lifer
Oct 6, 2009
37,617
33,336
136
Here is basically the situation as she describes it:

He pins her and gets touchy feely that ends in digital penetration. She says No, he stops and expresses that he thought she wanted it. She leaves. Yes, that is Sexual Assault, "Rape" in this situation is a grey area though. That usually involves Intercourse or some prolonged penetration, in my mind anyway, perhaps Legally it is.

What I am getting at here is that a Woman violated in this way and a Woman violated when full Intercourse or prolonged Penetration occurs are almost surely to have a very different response to the act. Especially if the first Woman has a certain level of Fondness or Respect to the person to begin with and that person expresses some kind of feeling that they thought it was something she would have wanted. Even if she didn't want it, she may still empathize with his situation. So I don't find her reaction to be odd in any way.
As someone who has casually used the word "irrelevant" to dismiss inconvenient points, you should be aware that what is "in your mind" is one of the most irrelevant things in this thread.
 

theeedude

Lifer
Feb 5, 2006
35,787
6,198
126
Here is basically the situation as she describes it:

He pins her and gets touchy feely that ends in digital penetration. She says No, he stops and expresses that he thought she wanted it. She leaves. Yes, that is Sexual Assault, "Rape" in this situation is a grey area though. That usually involves Intercourse or some prolonged penetration, in my mind anyway, perhaps Legally it is.

What I am getting at here is that a Woman violated in this way and a Woman violated when full Intercourse or prolonged Penetration occurs are almost surely to have a very different response to the act. Especially if the first Woman has a certain level of Fondness or Respect to the person to begin with and that person expresses some kind of feeling that they thought it was something she would have wanted. Even if she didn't want it, she may still empathize with his situation. So I don't find her reaction to be odd in any way.
If it happened, was non-consensual sexual assault, and was in the hallways of Congress as she claimed, she could have yelled and there would have been 10 cops there in 30 seconds and caught Biden wet handed. Then it would not be her word against his. Instead it was nothing for 26 years, then a bunch of changing stories with no details or evidence for a year, just as he becomes candidate for presidency against her beloved Putin's pick for the job.
 

sandorski

No Lifer
Oct 10, 1999
70,874
6,409
126
As someone who has casually used the word "irrelevant" to dismiss inconvenient points, you should be aware that what is "in your mind" is one of the most irrelevant things in this thread.

If you don't want to be part of the conversation, don't be part of it.
 

sandorski

No Lifer
Oct 10, 1999
70,874
6,409
126
If it happened, was non-consensual sexual assault, and was in the hallways of Congress as she claimed, she could have yelled and there would have been 10 cops there in 30 seconds and caught Biden wet handed. Then it would not be her word against his. Instead it was nothing for 26 years, then a bunch of changing stories with no details or evidence for a year, just as he becomes candidate for presidency against her beloved Putin's pick for the job.

So you are going with she didn't Yell objection? Every Woman that comes forward is second guessed for a myriad of reasons. She did what she did when she did it. She could have pulled out a Gat and capped his ass too, but she didn't.
 

theeedude

Lifer
Feb 5, 2006
35,787
6,198
126
So you are going with she didn't Yell objection? Every Woman that comes forward is second guessed for a myriad of reasons. She did what she did when she did it. She could have pulled out a Gat and capped his ass too, but she didn't.
She didn't do much of anything for 27 years.
 

pauldun170

Diamond Member
Sep 26, 2011
9,560
5,809
136
She got a creative mind all right, I'll give you that.

Was it not serving drinks, refusing his aggressive sexual advances, pursuit of arts and writing, moving with her baby daddy to midwest, love of Russia that sidelined her career? She said all those things at different times, but we might never know the truth. Also, if she left to midwest with her abusive baby daddy, was she already pregnant when Biden supposedly abused her? That seems to be missing from the story too because she conveniently doesn't remember when and where it happened.


Found the photo
Untitled-7-Recovered-Recovered-Recovered.jpg


Another angle
216a82c89d6eed14c49bd0bec3320e3d.jpg


another angle
bPS7rDa-1R659hhHvB6vOgspgSNJ15ObqpIy1CLKFGNkd8KqE34CgYRipDcfP99e1MIZbCKA4ZQPx7sqTcYwnvrxZi_dDYaSQdJZHaVkWNEa3n_r-C4RD-ljLA


Another angle
Biden-Event-Dallas-KDFWBCME01_3_mpg_21.07.56.24-e1583207097728.png


another angle
BITKOM5MSY6CNLPSEZW45SQXFQ.jpg


D3LxpZZVYAAY5Y2.jpg
 
Dec 10, 2005
29,685
15,265
136
If it happened, was non-consensual sexual assault, and was in the hallways of Congress as she claimed, she could have yelled and there would have been 10 cops there in 30 seconds and caught Biden wet handed.
Regardless of the veracity of the current allegation, asking why someone didn't cry out while being sexually assaulted is pretty fucked up.
 

cytg111

Lifer
Mar 17, 2008
26,843
16,110
136
Has anyone brought up the fact that the core of the allegation is that Biden .... grabbed someone by the pussy?
 

Starbuck1975

Lifer
Jan 6, 2005
14,698
1,909
126
Why is it that everyone who doesn't agree with you on every little thing is a water carrier? Is it because you can't defend the inconsistencies in your positions and thus have to resort to namecalling?
Irony. Concern squad liked your post.
 

Starbuck1975

Lifer
Jan 6, 2005
14,698
1,909
126
What did Ford and the people corroborating her story have to gain by coming forward when Kavanaugh was selected?
Nothing, which is why they were considered credible. I am holding Democrats to the standard they defined and advocated for.
 

UberNeuman

Lifer
Nov 4, 1999
16,937
3,087
126
Nothing, which is why they were considered credible. I am holding Democrats to the standard they defined and advocated for.

Nobody cares about your "standards". Guess you need something to whine about since you've bailed on your yammering about Trump's great job on corona.
lol.
 
Last edited:

dank69

Lifer
Oct 6, 2009
37,617
33,336
136
I voted for the scary socialist. This is your candidate. He is being held accountable to the standard he advocated for.
I would have voted for Bernie in the primary as well if I had the chance. Regardless, what you do in the primary doesn't address my point.
 

Jhhnn

IN MEMORIAM
Nov 11, 1999
62,365
14,686
136
Nothing, which is why they were considered credible. I am holding Democrats to the standard they defined and advocated for.

Peachy. Did Ford ever stealth edit her own words from "not about sexual misconduct" to "not only about sexual misconduct"? The whole argument wrt Reade now rests on the absurd premise that those mean the same thing when they obviously don't. She's busted.