The Inq Calls the 7900 a 7800GTX 512 Repeate

Page 7 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.

Megatomic

Lifer
Nov 9, 2000
20,127
6
81
The only way I'd ever go SLI is to take advantage of physics acceleration. My monitor is LCD with a native res. of 1280x1024 so SLI for graphics acceleration would be useless.
 

BFG10K

Lifer
Aug 14, 2000
22,709
3,002
126
That the FX5800, being louder, hotter and offering vastly superior AF should have been a no brainer choice over the R9700Pro?
Yeah, except for the whole issue of ludicrously poor performance when running shaders, unlike the X1900 which generally has the edge in modern shader based games like Fear.

The X1900's major failing is the cooling solution but it has plenty of other advantages over the 7900 parts. 6xAA in particular is viable in many titles plus it's blazingly fast too. nVidia's 4xAA is inferior and the xS modes are generally far too slow to use except in old games.

Also nVidia has some attrocious bugs in some games when you use the xS modes and 16xAA seems to introduce mouse lag to many Direct3D titles even when the framerate is high.

The NV30 didn't take a huge hit from AF,
For the application mode it most certainly did, the only mode that was superior to ATi. Under that mode it wasn't much faster than a Ti4600. The other two modes were both inferior to ATi's quality AF.

4xS- filtered all transparencies.
Not only was it generally unusably slow but it was very poor on edge AA. Also IIRC the xS modes weren't even available under OpenGL.

and ran at DX10 levels of precission so many years ago.
Yes, and we all know how fast this "DX10 precision" turned out in practice.
 

Waxman

Senior member
Jun 14, 2004
241
0
0
WOW what a waste of forum space over this kitty fight. STOP already and get back to availability of these cards :)
 

Megatomic

Lifer
Nov 9, 2000
20,127
6
81
I had no problems with availability. I'd say with one in my box, one in my buddy's box, and one in lots of other guys on the forums boxes' that this was a hard launch. Demand has outstipped supply, yay for a successful product. IMHO. ;)
 

Wreckage

Banned
Jul 1, 2005
5,529
0
0
Originally posted by: 5150Joker
Originally posted by: Ronin
Ignore the fanboys looking to make this refresh look like a bad launch. They're the lazy ones that don't spend the time backing up their data.

And yeah, the reason there's so much stock of X1900's is because people aren't BUYING them.

45% of the market share? Please submit links reflecting that number, because I personally call horsesh!t.



Yeah I'd say they're selling out rapidly as well. nVidia are excellent with marketing and coupled with forum trolls/nVidiots, there's no beating them. If the roles were reversed and nVidia had the superior IQ X1900XTX and ATi the needle in your eyes AF 7900 GTX, ATi would've been lucky to sell a dozen cards.

It's not marketing. It's better cards, better support, better warranty, better fan base, etc.

You can cry all you want for your poor XTX because no one wants them now that the GTX is out. I will take NVIDIA's AF over ATI's blurry AA.

It seems only ATI people are really complaining about NVIDIA availability.

A simple price search shows several brands available.
 

Megatomic

Lifer
Nov 9, 2000
20,127
6
81
Originally posted by: PirreLi
Originally posted by: Megatomic
7900GT_IDLE.JPG

7900GT_LOAD.JPG

And it's completely inaudible with the Zalman cooler.

The highest i ahve seen mine go up to with load is around 40 and idle its at 32
I'm sure my temps. would be lower if:
1. Ambient temp. in my computer were lower. It's already warm in daytime here in Texas.
2. The arctic ceramique needs to cure or set in a bit before it works it's best.

What are you using to load up your card with? Have you tried RTHDRIBL? If not, give that a shot and see how high your GPU temps. go. :)
 

Matt2

Diamond Member
Jul 28, 2001
4,762
0
0
I.... Need.... My.... 7900GT.... SLI....

I havent moved from #108 in the step-up queue since Thursday :(
 

Griswold

Senior member
Dec 24, 2004
630
0
0
Originally posted by: Ronin
Ignore the fanboys looking to make this refresh look like a bad launch. They're the lazy ones that don't spend the time backing up their data.

And yeah, the reason there's so much stock of X1900's is because people aren't BUYING them.

45% of the market share? Please submit links reflecting that number, because I personally call horsesh!t.

This was certainly the first fanboi post in this thread. And you get a * from me for even calling others "fanboys" in the same post.

 

DAPUNISHER

Super Moderator CPU Forum Mod and Elite Member
Super Moderator
Aug 22, 2001
31,757
31,734
146
Perhaps some of the next "crop" will feature full HDCP compliance on the cards, hence the delay?
 

BenSkywalker

Diamond Member
Oct 9, 1999
9,140
67
91
Yeah, except for the whole issue of ludicrously poor performance when running shaders, unlike the X1900 which generally has the edge in modern shader based games like Fear.

Can you name me one game worth playing that came out within six months of the FX5800 that had shader performance issues? HL2 didn't quite make it IIRC. What you are trying to do is compare how the 5800 ended up fairing on games that were not close to out when it was released and then swapping that around and comparing the 1900 to a legacy title for its era.

For the application mode it most certainly did, the only mode that was superior to ATi. Under that mode it wasn't much faster than a Ti4600. The other two modes were both inferior to ATi's quality AF.

Pretty much everything you wrote in this quote is factually wrong. The 5800 took a ~35% hit when running 8x application- link while the R9700Pro took about a 43% hit when running quality mode- link. That is reality- the FX5800Ultra took less of a performance hit then the R9700Pro percentage wise and was vastly superior in terms of IQ. I'm not asking you to rely on my memory- the proof is in the numbers.

Not only was it generally unusably slow but it was very poor on edge AA.

It was about 18% slower then straight 4x- compared to ATi's 6x which was about 15% slower then 4x(ATi numbers, nVidia). In reality based on B3D's numbers nVidia's 4xS was less of a performance hit then ATi's 6x. Your memory is slipping in your old age :p ;)

Also IIRC the xS modes weren't even available under OpenGL.

That's true, but nVidia is also capable of handling HDR+AA depending on the application so I figured that was a comparable point.

Yes, and we all know how fast this "DX10 precision" turned out in practice.

I thought we were talking about IQ here? :D
 

DAPUNISHER

Super Moderator CPU Forum Mod and Elite Member
Super Moderator
Aug 22, 2001
31,757
31,734
146
Till FarCry hit, My 5800U@550/1050 and Barton@2.43ghz played everything I tried very nicely@10x7 including Halo. Some games I could turn up AA/AF pretty high, others I couldn't. And I said then what others are saying now about noisy cards, game with cans or speakers cranked up, and the fan noise isn't really an issue because in 2D mode it was dead silent i.e. passively cooled. There was whine when you boot up, but I do DC 24/7 so even that was a non-issue.</thread jack>
 

Yreka

Diamond Member
Jul 6, 2005
4,084
0
76
Originally posted by: tuteja198603/20/2006 07:04 AM
err XT is better choice but nvidia got everyone hooked on SLI which i think is pertty stupid :! spend your cash on something eles i say instead of another card.



Your post from this thread, only 1 hour later. 03/20/2006 08:15 AM


Originally posted by: tuteja1986
I will take out the x1900xt and put in the new comp and buy 2x7900GTX.

SO this upgrade will cost me alot but with my discount it shouldn't be that much.

I will test the 2 setup and see which one I like and then chose if i want SLI or crossfire and then sell Setup i don't like on ebay to some fruite cake for the same price i bought it at. Amazing how much expensive things sell on Ebay AUstralia.


:confused:
 

letdown427

Golden Member
Jan 3, 2006
1,594
1
0
Originally posted by: Yreka
Originally posted by: tuteja198603/20/2006 07:04 AM
err XT is better choice but nvidia got everyone hooked on SLI which i think is pertty stupid :! spend your cash on something eles i say instead of another card.



Your post from this thread, only 1 hour later. 03/20/2006 08:15 AM


Originally posted by: tuteja1986
I will take out the x1900xt and put in the new comp and buy 2x7900GTX.

SO this upgrade will cost me alot but with my discount it shouldn't be that much.

I will test the 2 setup and see which one I like and then chose if i want SLI or crossfire and then sell Setup i don't like on ebay to some fruite cake for the same price i bought it at. Amazing how much expensive things sell on Ebay AUstralia.


:confused:


Some people are just fickle I guess. :confused:






EDIT: Or FOS. ;)
 

Jules

Lifer
Oct 9, 1999
15,213
0
0
Originally posted by: Griswold
Originally posted by: Ronin
Ignore the fanboys looking to make this refresh look like a bad launch. They're the lazy ones that don't spend the time backing up their data.

And yeah, the reason there's so much stock of X1900's is because people aren't BUYING them.

45% of the market share? Please submit links reflecting that number, because I personally call horsesh!t.

This was certainly the first fanboi post in this thread. And you get a * from me for even calling others "fanboys" in the same post.
thumbs up for you :thumbsup:
 

diskmagnet

Junior Member
May 11, 2005
11
0
0
This thread is silly.

I cant say I had problems tracking down a 7900.

I was placed #266 on Evga step-up program
4 buisness days later, I got confirmation to send mine out.

I also decided to go sli. ( casue the step up cost me a whole $9 for shipping )
I tracked down a bunch of cards. I checked the major retailers, most had them.
I checked LOCAL retailers, and I live in a fairly small town. And they even had some. Mostly BFG, but still.

I'm buying one tonight, and I'll be shipping my 7800 out tomorrow.

Happy days
 

ColdZero

Senior member
Jul 22, 2000
211
0
0
I can't say I had that much trouble either. I ordered my evga 7900gt co yesterday from newegg and its waiting for me at my door back home right now.
 

Megatomic

Lifer
Nov 9, 2000
20,127
6
81
Originally posted by: Megatomic
7900GT_IDLE.JPG

7900GT_LOAD.JPG

And it's completely inaudible with the Zalman cooler.

DAY2_7900GT_IDLE.JPG
So, after 24 hours of usage (with the PC off for 10 hours while I slept), the idle temp. has dropped down to 39C - this is with the PC on since 11am today. I've seen the temp. hit 38C at times, too.

A few more days and the GPU might run a degree or two above case temp max. at idle. :cool:
 

Ronin

Diamond Member
Mar 3, 2001
4,563
1
0
server.counter-strike.net
Originally posted by: MyStupidMouth
Originally posted by: Griswold
Originally posted by: Ronin
Ignore the fanboys looking to make this refresh look like a bad launch. They're the lazy ones that don't spend the time backing up their data.

And yeah, the reason there's so much stock of X1900's is because people aren't BUYING them.

45% of the market share? Please submit links reflecting that number, because I personally call horsesh!t.

This was certainly the first fanboi post in this thread. And you get a * from me for even calling others "fanboys" in the same post.
thumbs up for you :thumbsup:

In fanboism is truth, color me fanboied. ;)

Ask any retailer what's being purchased (or even the etailers). I wasn't posting a slant towards either company, just plain dollars and cents facts.
 

RobertR1

Golden Member
Oct 22, 2004
1,113
1
81
Originally posted by: Ronin
Originally posted by: MyStupidMouth
Originally posted by: Griswold
Originally posted by: Ronin
Ignore the fanboys looking to make this refresh look like a bad launch. They're the lazy ones that don't spend the time backing up their data.

And yeah, the reason there's so much stock of X1900's is because people aren't BUYING them.

45% of the market share? Please submit links reflecting that number, because I personally call horsesh!t.

This was certainly the first fanboi post in this thread. And you get a * from me for even calling others "fanboys" in the same post.
thumbs up for you :thumbsup:

In fanboism is truth, color me fanboied. ;)

Ask any retailer what's being purchased (or even the etailers). I wasn't posting a slant towards either company, just plain dollars and cents facts.

Busy day or did you have a chance to make that call?
 

Ronin

Diamond Member
Mar 3, 2001
4,563
1
0
server.counter-strike.net
Some of us work for a living, Robert. Perhaps you should consider doing the same.

You might also want to note that TSMC wouldn't be able to make those determinations, but the manufacturers themselves. ;) If you read the original comment, you'll see that it was said in jest, and typical of your responses, you weren't able to comprehend that.

You, on the other hand, still maintain that 80-90C constantly sustained on a GPU is healthy and ok. Thank god you don't manufacture electronics. ;)
 

RobertR1

Golden Member
Oct 22, 2004
1,113
1
81
Originally posted by: Ronin
Some of us work for a living, Robert. Perhaps you should consider doing the same.

You might also want to note that TSMC wouldn't be able to make those determinations, but the manufacturers themselves. ;) If you read the original comment, you'll see that it was said in jest, and typical of your responses, you weren't able to comprehend that.

You, on the other hand, still maintain that 80-90C constantly sustained on a GPU is healthy and ok. Thank god you don't manufacture electronics. ;)

This is why I really like the English language....soooo many cute of ways of saying "no."