The hidden violence of the socialistic mindset

Page 5 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.

JSt0rm

Lifer
Sep 5, 2000
27,399
3,948
126
I think blue maxs biggest problem is he thinks we are all one person. #TruThink
 

Blue_Max

Diamond Member
Jul 7, 2011
4,223
153
106
You might have a point if you weren't in fact a raging misogynist.

Then the SJW approach has done it's job. Scream "misogynist" enough times, hopefully the label will stick.

I'll say this again - it IS possible to fully respect the female gender while at the same time NOT support the outright lies told by feminist doctrine.

Shocking, isn't it? They can coexist. They're NOT mutually-exclusive.

The label of "misogynist" is both a lie AND a powerful tool the socialistic mindset (topic of thread) just loves to use because of its wonderful effect.

The accuser gets to throw that grenade knowing full well it is very unlikely to be thrown back. Other people observing hear that rallying cry because they've been programmed to respond at several conscious and unconscious levels. Some from social programming, some right down to our biological instincts to protect women. The general public protective mindset will almost always rally to the defense of a true victim and against a genuine villain.

For that reason, those Power Words are used. Anyone who disagrees with a woman, under almost any circumstances, can now be called a 'misogynist'. Glance at one too long and she doesn't like it, she's been 'raped'. Use the extreme power word because of the reaction it will create, and disagreement becomes 'an evil hater of women', an unappreciated glance becomes 'a vile rapist' and the pubic (who don't know the details) will assume the word means what it's supposed to mean, and punish the accused accordingly.
...and the accuser grins with delight that the lie that was planted has borne fruit.

And this is why many clear-thinking people are turning away from the uber-liberal, the mega-feminist, the social justice warrior; all of whom seem to usually support socialism - sometimes to the extreme.
 

JSt0rm

Lifer
Sep 5, 2000
27,399
3,948
126
Clear thinking. Lol. Should that be clearthink? You need meds... Spending your life thinking you are in the middle of a culture war between old white guys and sjw. Lol. Go do something with your horrible existence.
 

WelshBloke

Lifer
Jan 12, 2005
33,256
11,396
136
Then the SJW approach has done it's job. Scream "misogynist" enough times, hopefully the label will stick.

I'll say this again - it IS possible to fully respect the female gender while at the same time NOT support the outright lies told by feminist doctrine.

Shocking, isn't it? They can coexist. They're NOT mutually-exclusive.

The label of "misogynist" is both a lie AND a powerful tool the socialistic mindset (topic of thread) just loves to use because of its wonderful effect.

The accuser gets to throw that grenade knowing full well it is very unlikely to be thrown back. Other people observing hear that rallying cry because they've been programmed to respond at several conscious and unconscious levels. Some from social programming, some right down to our biological instincts to protect women. The general public protective mindset will almost always rally to the defense of a true victim and against a genuine villain.

For that reason, those Power Words are used. Anyone who disagrees with a woman, under almost any circumstances, can now be called a 'misogynist'. Glance at one too long and she doesn't like it, she's been 'raped'. Use the extreme power word because of the reaction it will create, and disagreement becomes 'an evil hater of women', an unappreciated glance becomes 'a vile rapist' and the pubic (who don't know the details) will assume the word means what it's supposed to mean, and punish the accused accordingly.
...and the accuser grins with delight that the lie that was planted has borne fruit.

And this is why many clear-thinking people are turning away from the uber-liberal, the mega-feminist, the social justice warrior; all of whom seem to usually support socialism - sometimes to the extreme.

Or it could just be that you are a misogynist.
 

Blue_Max

Diamond Member
Jul 7, 2011
4,223
153
106
Clear thinking. Lol. Should that be clearthink? You need meds... Spending your life thinking you are in the middle of a culture war between old white guys and sjw. Lol. Go do something with your horrible existence.

Or it could just be that you are a misogynist.

Riiiiight. Well, present some evidence of your claim instead of merely hurling playground insults.

In the meantime, enjoy this fun video! :D
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zABrcdLExq4
 

Blue_Max

Diamond Member
Jul 7, 2011
4,223
153
106
Evidence: Your post history in P&N.

Translation: If you disagree with what feminists hold dear, you're a misogynist.

Since you can't back up your claim that I'm a genuine misogynist (because I'm not) you have to hurl slander and hope it sticks.

To the super-liberal;
Disagreement = hate.
Disagreement of a women's issue = misogyny

There's your liberal violence in a nutshell.
"Free speech for me - NOT for thee!"
 

JSt0rm

Lifer
Sep 5, 2000
27,399
3,948
126
you are free to say whatever you want. You are not free from consequences from your speech though.
 

brycejones

Lifer
Oct 18, 2005
30,026
30,959
136
Translation: If you disagree with what feminists hold dear, you're a misogynist.

Since you can't back up your claim that I'm a genuine misogynist (because I'm not) you have to hurl slander and hope it sticks.

To the super-liberal;
Disagreement = hate.
Disagreement of a women's issue = misogyny

There's your liberal violence in a nutshell.
"Free speech for me - NOT for thee!"

Nope you couldn't be more wrong. Btw you are free to post whatever. Doesn't mean I have to agree with it or say that I do. Welcome to free speech.
 

WelshBloke

Lifer
Jan 12, 2005
33,256
11,396
136
Translation: If you disagree with what feminists hold dear, you're a misogynist.

If you have to do your own personal "translation" of a simple, straight forward statement it's fairly obvious that you're being disingenuous

Since you can't back up your claim that I'm a genuine misogynist (because I'm not) you have to hurl slander and hope it sticks.

Your post history is all we have to go on. Now it's possible that IRL you don't display the same attitude but that's irrelevant to here.

To the super-liberal;
Disagreement = hate.
Disagreement of a women's issue = misogyny

You're the one getting het up over a fairly accurate descriptor.

There's your liberal violence in a nutshell.
"Free speech for me - NOT for thee!"

Really? People calling you a misogynist is violence?
 

nickqt

Diamond Member
Jan 15, 2015
8,203
9,226
136
If you have to do your own personal "translation" of a simple, straight forward statement it's fairly obvious that you're being disingenuous



Your post history is all we have to go on. Now it's possible that IRL you don't display the same attitude but that's irrelevant to here.



You're the one getting het up over a fairly accurate descriptor.



Really? People calling you a misogynist is violence?
Listen. White men are the biggest victims in the world. Just ask BlueMax and the other bigots who come here and assert that over and over and over and over and over...
 

Blue_Max

Diamond Member
Jul 7, 2011
4,223
153
106
you are free to say whatever you want. You are not free from consequences from your speech though.

How ironic that someone like myself is not free from consequences, but people like yourselves ARE. You can hurl accusations all you like without fear of punishment because you're merely taking the popular/general "good" thought to the extreme. Anyone who disagrees with the extreme version of feminism (like the 'rape culture' BS), gets the be called the corresponding extreme version of the "bad guy".

So you get to hurl the accusations with little-to-no evidence and face zero consequences even if you're proven wrong. Pretty sweet deal. Listen and Believe, shitlords!
 

WelshBloke

Lifer
Jan 12, 2005
33,256
11,396
136
How ironic that someone like myself is not free from consequences, but people like yourselves ARE. You can hurl accusations all you like without fear of punishment because you're merely taking the popular/general "good" thought to the extreme. Anyone who disagrees with the extreme version of feminism (like the 'rape culture' BS), gets the be called the corresponding extreme version of the "bad guy".

So you get to hurl the accusations with little-to-no evidence and face zero consequences even if you're proven wrong. Pretty sweet deal.

Soooo...

You want to be able to disagree with people but you dont want people to be able to disagree with you?
 

Blue_Max

Diamond Member
Jul 7, 2011
4,223
153
106
Soooo...

You want to be able to disagree with people but you dont want people to be able to disagree with you?

Not at all. Quite the opposite, your side usually does, hence your college "safe zones" and protesting of college speakers with a message you disagree with, or the banning of users with opinions you don't like, and on and on and on...

But if you diagree, say WHY and EXPLAIN YOUR REASONING rather than just hurl blanket insults in order to discredit the speaker.
 

WelshBloke

Lifer
Jan 12, 2005
33,256
11,396
136
Not at all. Quite the opposite, your side usually does, hence your college "safe zones" and protesting of college speakers with a message you disagree with, or the banning of users with opinions you don't like, and on and on and on...

In what way is that "my side"?

But if you diagree, say WHY and EXPLAIN YOUR REASONING rather than just hurl blanket insults in order to discredit the speaker.


My reasoning is that I've read your posts and come to the conclusion that you're a misogynist.

Also I'm not discrediting you, I'm just saying how I see things. If you don't want to be seen that way maybe you need to review your posts.
 

Moonbeam

Elite Member
Nov 24, 1999
74,799
6,775
126
Not at all. Quite the opposite, your side usually does, hence your college "safe zones" and protesting of college speakers with a message you disagree with, or the banning of users with opinions you don't like, and on and on and on...

But if you diagree, say WHY and EXPLAIN YOUR REASONING rather than just hurl blanket insults in order to discredit the speaker.

Imagine you were demented, that you had a twisted view of women, that you are misogynist, that you won't want to know you're a misogynist and feel that being called one is an attack rather than a factual description of your actual mental state, that you come off as a raving lunatic and are upside down in reality, that you live in a protective bubble of crazy. Then imagine how sad it would be if anybody else caught your terrible disease. You would have the experience of a big blob of slime mold that went through life in a rage that people seem to stare.
 

Blue_Max

Diamond Member
Jul 7, 2011
4,223
153
106
Heh... well, if you don't have any factual evidence to go on (which you don't) just keep slingin' those insults around. It's rule number one in the SJW/liberal/feminist playbook.

Rule #1, no logical debate! discredit through insults and mockery
Rule #2, use Power Words like 'rapist' and 'misogynist' to incite rebellion and anger in bystanders
Rule #3, if the target refuses to give up, silence him by any means necessary. Use powerful people to block or remove him, including employers and police. Tell any story required to get him in trouble. Pain by proxy.

That'll teach 'em to know your side is the correct one.

Facts? Who needs those? It's all about feelings, kids.
If your feeeelings are hurt, well, it MUST be wrong! It MUST be evil! REVENGE!!


Looney liberals.
 

JSt0rm

Lifer
Sep 5, 2000
27,399
3,948
126
lmao. Waaaaa I think a thing and you all dont waaaaaaa.

You are a blue collar basic bitch arent you?
 

brycejones

Lifer
Oct 18, 2005
30,026
30,959
136
Heh... well, if you don't have any factual evidence to go on (which you don't) just keep slingin' those insults around. It's rule number one in the SJW/liberal/feminist playbook.

Rule #1, no logical debate! discredit through insults and mockery
Rule #2, use Power Words like 'rapist' and 'misogynist' to incite rebellion and anger in bystanders
Rule #3, if the target refuses to give up, silence him by any means necessary. Use powerful people to block or remove him, including employers and police. Tell any story required to get him in trouble. Pain by proxy.

That'll teach 'em to know your side is the correct one.

Facts? Who needs those? It's all about feelings, kids.
If your feeeelings are hurt, well, it MUST be wrong! It MUST be evil! REVENGE!!


Looney liberals.

Rule #1, play the oppressed victim card.
Rule #2, post stupid set of rules that says anyone who opposes or just doesn't agree with your buill shit is being a big fat meany pants and a SJW.
Rule #3 repeat 1 and 2.

This is a fun game.
 

Blue_Max

Diamond Member
Jul 7, 2011
4,223
153
106
Rule #1, play the oppressed victim card.
Rule #2, post stupid set of rules that says anyone who opposes or just doesn't agree with your buill shit is being a big fat meany pants and a SJW.
Rule #3 repeat 1 and 2.

This is a fun game.

Except mine is accurate. Yours is not.

#1. Show me where I'm claiming to be a victim. You make the claim, you back it up. Of course I've yet to see even ONE of the lib/fem/SJW-side's claims backed up yet so I won't hold my breath.
One down.

#2. These 'rules' are a well-known observation of the typical attack patterns of the SJW. It very, very rarely deviates from this format. Your rebuttal is exactly that. You say my position is BS? Mine is backed up from facts and figures from government and police statistics. Your own precious pay gap theory is debunked by the very same 'report' it came from in the first place because that very report showed men working >9h more per week than women were. That difference in working hours ALONE makes up most of the difference in FINAL PAY. Oh, and it's been illegal to pay a woman less for 40 years now. So who's clinging to BS, eh?

If you want to say I'm wrong, PROVE IT. Calling people names won't replace facts in a debate.

...but then, this isn't a logical debate, is it? Discussion of ideas and problems is verboten. Only your opinions shall be tolerated, other opinions are not discussed - only shouted down. Nobody's silencing you - you're silencing them.
pTJEaej.jpg
 

Meghan54

Lifer
Oct 18, 2009
11,684
5,228
136
I swear, BM, that born a few decades earlier and you'd have been right at home standing with George Wallace at the Univ. of Alabama, attempting to deny blacks entry to that school. Or a few decades earlier than that and you'd have been at the forefront of trying to quash the right to vote women were attempting to acquire.