The End Is Near!

jman19

Lifer
Nov 3, 2000
11,225
664
126
Yep it looks like she will finally throw in the towel.

What will be interesting now is how Obama and other members of the party will respond to her after her campaign tactics.
 

nageov3t

Lifer
Feb 18, 2004
42,808
83
91
she and bill are major fund-raisers and she's going back into the senate having had 49% of democrats nationwide vote for her.

I think they'll respond to her just fine.
 

theeedude

Lifer
Feb 5, 2006
35,787
6,197
126
Bummer, well, she stuck it out and let the people have a choice, which is good.
Now it's time for moderates to rally behind McCain.
 

fskimospy

Elite Member
Mar 10, 2006
87,964
55,355
136
Originally posted by: jman19
Yep it looks like she will finally throw in the towel.

What will be interesting now is how Obama and other members of the party will respond to her after her campaign tactics.

What have been so bad about her campaign tactics? I mean sure she's tried to present things in the most positive light for herself, (which hasn't been easy) but what has she really done that's so wrong? It seems like people are offended that she keeps trying to be president.

The only thing I can think of that I truly believe was out of line about how Clinton has done things is when she said that McCain was more qualified to be the commander in chief then Obama is. That's a big primary no-no. You never say the guy from the other party is better then one of your own party guys.
 

jman19

Lifer
Nov 3, 2000
11,225
664
126
Originally posted by: eskimospy
Originally posted by: jman19
Yep it looks like she will finally throw in the towel.

What will be interesting now is how Obama and other members of the party will respond to her after her campaign tactics.

What have been so bad about her campaign tactics? I mean sure she's tried to present things in the most positive light for herself, (which hasn't been easy) but what has she really done that's so wrong? It seems like people are offended that she keeps trying to be president.

The only thing I can think of that I truly believe was out of line about how Clinton has done things is when she said that McCain was more qualified to be the commander in chief then Obama is. That's a big primary no-no. You never say the guy from the other party is better then one of your own party guys.

I didn't really mean to put her in a bad light. I was just curious if some would think riding this out as long as she has would hurt the Dems chances. She had ever right to campaign the way she has, there's no doubt about that.
 

jman19

Lifer
Nov 3, 2000
11,225
664
126
Originally posted by: loki8481
she and bill are major fund-raisers and she's going back into the senate having had 49% of democrats nationwide vote for her.

I think they'll respond to her just fine.

That's exactly my point, really. She is a very important member of the party. Do you think she'll be extended an olive branch from Obama, so to speak, in the form of being VP?
 

BeauJangles

Lifer
Aug 26, 2001
13,941
1
0
Originally posted by: senseamp
Bummer, well, she stuck it out and let the people have a choice, which is good.
Now it's time for moderates to rally behind McCain.

Because Hillary lost the election, her supporters are going to throw away everything and vote for McCain? Talk about crying over spilled milk, Hillary and Obama are 95% same on the issues.
 

bamacre

Lifer
Jul 1, 2004
21,029
2
81
Originally posted by: jman19
Originally posted by: loki8481
she and bill are major fund-raisers and she's going back into the senate having had 49% of democrats nationwide vote for her.

I think they'll respond to her just fine.

That's exactly my point, really. She is a very important member of the party. Do you think she'll be extended an olive branch from Obama, so to speak, in the form of being VP?

I pray not.
 

nageov3t

Lifer
Feb 18, 2004
42,808
83
91
Originally posted by: BlinderBomber
Originally posted by: senseamp
Bummer, well, she stuck it out and let the people have a choice, which is good.
Now it's time for moderates to rally behind McCain.

Because Hillary lost the election, her supporters are going to throw away everything and vote for McCain? Talk about crying over spilled milk, Hillary and Obama are 95% same on the issues.

I think it really depends on what happens in the next couple weeks after Hillary drops out.

I've said it before, but if Obama can't unite the other half of the party that shares nearly all of his views on issues, he doesn't deserve the job.
 

Lemon law

Lifer
Nov 6, 2005
20,984
3
0
Do not get me wrong, I am not a Hillary fan, but I will believe it when Hillary officially concedes and not before. After all, June 3 marks the end of the primaries, after that any hope Hillary has lies in persuading the remaining super delegates who must come to the Hillary side something on the order of 85% or better.

But then again, I am also prepared to accept tomorrow will be her concession speech, but until I know for sure, I will wait.

In terms of the jman question of---What will be interesting now is how Obama and other members of the party will respond to her after her campaign tactics?

That is fairly easy to answer, if Hillary concedes tomorrow, the democrats will all embrace and Hillary will be expected to campaign hard for Obama for the general.
If Hillary does not concede tomorrow, she will make some very strong democratic enemies if she tries to make a floor fight at the convention. But there may be a middle ground
Hillary can also receive a forgive and forget, and thats to delay her concession until Obama goes over 2118 which should occur by late this week.
 

BeauJangles

Lifer
Aug 26, 2001
13,941
1
0
Originally posted by: loki8481
Originally posted by: BlinderBomber
Originally posted by: senseamp
Bummer, well, she stuck it out and let the people have a choice, which is good.
Now it's time for moderates to rally behind McCain.

Because Hillary lost the election, her supporters are going to throw away everything and vote for McCain? Talk about crying over spilled milk, Hillary and Obama are 95% same on the issues.

I think it really depends on what happens in the next couple weeks after Hillary drops out.

I've said it before, but if Obama can't unite the other half of the party that shares nearly all of his views on issues, he doesn't deserve the job.

Well, he's only partly responsible. Hillary's supporters also have to get over themselves and recognize that Obama or Hillary for four years is far better than McCain. There are a few things that make them different (experience being the biggest one), but democrats really need to get their shit together, back whoever the democratic candidate is and retake the White House.
 

Robor

Elite Member
Oct 9, 1999
16,979
0
76
Originally posted by: senseamp
Bummer, well, she stuck it out and let the people have a choice, which is good.
Now it's time for moderates to rally behind McCain.

Yeah because McCain is the natural choice for someone who supported Clinton because their policies are so alike. :roll:
 

Rio Rebel

Administrator Emeritus<br>Elite Member
Oct 9, 1999
5,194
0
0
Finally.

Goal #1 was getting Hillary out of the race. I would have voted third party if she had won. (I would have considered McCain even now if not for his continuation of the Bush fiasco in Iraq).

Goal #2 will be to rid the White House of the republican pseudo-conservatives and the most asinine foreign policy in history.

 

theeedude

Lifer
Feb 5, 2006
35,787
6,197
126
Originally posted by: BlinderBomber
Originally posted by: senseamp
Bummer, well, she stuck it out and let the people have a choice, which is good.
Now it's time for moderates to rally behind McCain.

Because Hillary lost the election, her supporters are going to throw away everything and vote for McCain? Talk about crying over spilled milk, Hillary and Obama are 95% same on the issues.

I didn't say all her supporters, but moderates, yes. Obama is simply too liberal to have in there without checks and balances.
 

RY62

Senior member
Mar 13, 2005
891
153
106
Originally posted by: BlinderBomber
Originally posted by: senseamp
Bummer, well, she stuck it out and let the people have a choice, which is good.
Now it's time for moderates to rally behind McCain.

Because Hillary lost the election, her supporters are going to throw away everything and vote for McCain? Talk about crying over spilled milk, Hillary and Obama are 95% same on the issues.

Her supporters have every right to vote in whatever way feels right to them. You can't say for sure that Hillary and Obama are 95% the same on issues. Sure, from what he says you'd get that impression but everything about him is fake and there's no real history to look at, so what can you really believe?

I've believed he was a manufactured candidate, being pushed by the far left, from the begining. Everything about him was manufactured, all the way to when he gives his acceptance speech. Which will be on Aug 28, 2008, the 45th anniversary of the MLK, I have a Dream, speech. Just a coincidence, huh?

Clinton supporters need to follow their own feelings and send the message that feels right. If that is voting for Obama, McCain, or just sitting it out, it's their choice. The far right and the far left both need to get the message that the government is ours. Stop trying to push a partisan agenda on us.
 

mshan

Diamond Member
Nov 16, 2004
7,868
0
71
She may just officially suspend her campaign tomorrow.

I remember someone on tv saying that this way, she can continue to fundraise to pay off her debts till the Democratic convention.

Plus, if something happens to Obama, she can jump right back in.

 

Harvey

Administrator<br>Elite Member
Oct 9, 1999
35,059
73
91
Originally posted by: senseamp

Now it's time for moderates to rally behind McCain.

Anyone who supports the Bushwhackos criminal war in Iraq and disastrous economic and social polices, here, is no moderate.

mod·er·ate

1. Avoiding extremes of behavior or expression.

2. Observing reasonable limits.

3. Calm, temperate.

4. Professing or characterized by political or social beliefs that are not extreme.

5. Tending toward the mean or average amount or dimension; having average or less than average quality; mediocre.

Of those definitions, only the last fits McSame.
 

Perknose

Forum Director & Omnipotent Overlord
Forum Director
Oct 9, 1999
46,870
10,662
147
Originally posted by: jman19
Yep it looks like she will finally throw in the towel.

What will be interesting now is how Obama and other members of the party will respond to her after her campaign tactics.

Not much of a student of American politics are you? Her "tactics" were mild compared to other primary contenders in both parties in recent and in less recent history, yet is almost ALL cases, once the nomination was won, the candidates closed ranks, let bygones be byones as just being, you know, politics, and soldiered on.

Daddy Bush called would be nominee Reagan's economic plans "Voodoo Economics", yet happily supported them once Reagan, obviously bitterly upset at being so slandered, chose him as his running mate.

Obama has already started publically praising Clinton. And Hillary and Bill Clinton will work long and hard and sincerely to see that he's elected.

Don't believe me? Just watch!

 

Stoneburner

Diamond Member
May 29, 2003
3,491
0
76
Originally posted by: Perknose
Originally posted by: jman19
Yep it looks like she will finally throw in the towel.

What will be interesting now is how Obama and other members of the party will respond to her after her campaign tactics.

Not much of a student of American politics are you? Her "tactics" were mild compared to other primary contenders in both parties in recent and in less recent history, yet is almost ALL cases, once the nomination was won, the candidates closed ranks, let bygones be byones as just being, you know, politics, and soldiered on.

Daddy Bush called would be nominee Reagan's economic plans "Voodoo Economics", yet happily supported them once Reagan, obviously bitterly upset at being so slandered, chose him as his running mate.

Obama has already started publically praising Clinton. And Hillary and Bill Clinton will work long and hard and sincerely to see that he's elected.

Don't believe me? Just watch!

Possible but the question is does the utility of hillary outweigh the negatives? I think there are better choices for Obama out there. bill Richardson, Tim Kaine or Mark Warner, Ed Rendell maybe, and even Sebelius. Obama may feel the democratic party needs unifying. Of course, it really was a concerted effort on the part of clinton to make it appear there is a democratic split. To analogize, it's like kobe bryant getting MVP for "succeeding despite all the turmoil surrounding his team" even though he caused the turmoil himself.